Sentences with phrase «after writing their thoughts»

After writing their thoughts down, they walk together to the river and quietly place their notes into a small, cardboard «Viking boat,» which they then push into the current.

Not exact matches

After thinking about it for a minute, I turned the task into a note on my to - do list: «Write gratitude post.»

I'm talking about writing down the first few thoughts you have after you've arrived at work but before you've started on the day's tasks.

«After an analysis of the GE long term care exposure, we had thought an outsized charge was likely, but have to admit the $ 15B of additional capital ultimately being required was far in excess of our adverse case expectations, and is a negative read across for other insurers with sizeable long term care blocks in our view,» Evercore ISI analyst Thomas Gallagher wrote Tuesday.

We asked Bishop Swing his thoughts about this column after we wrote it.

«I DO N'T WANT ANYMORE,» wrote one customer to an online service agent, after being billed more than $ 140 for what he thought was a one - time trial for teeth whitener.

After a year of empty fulmination, Rosen writes, Trump's China threats have grown «real teeth... Many in China think this is a rough patch and will blow over.

The family's bank of choice has long been Deutsche Bank, which was the only bank willing to loan to Trump after he lost others money in a series of bankruptcies — something he figured «was the bank's problem, not mine,» he wrote in his 2007 book, «Think Big: Make it Happen in Business and Life.»

While the content can seem a bit dense and academic at times — the essays are, after all, written by some of the nation's leading thinkers on business issues — the website is a potentially valuable resource for policy makers and anyone thinking about starting a new business.

Indeed, when I wrote my 2003 book, Value Leadership, after the Enron and WorldCom scandals, I was thinking about how important it is for a business to act based on values that make employees, customers, and communities better off — which ultimately benefits a company's investors.

But after he wrote it, he was fearful of what people would think.

Really thought I was going to need this after the 5th round,» Brady wrote on Facebook.

After I sent him the information I had about the meetings, Peter C. Newman wrote to me: «I tried phoning people I trusted and I thought trusted me, and no one would tell me anything.

However, as I write in my new weekly commentary, «As Markets Plunge, Some Value Surfaces,» and in my new paper, «After the Rout,» I don't think the selloff is a prelude to another 2008 - style cataclysm.

Note: The title of this piece (see: here) was just too good to pass up on — after we wrote the piece, we found a couple others who thought so as well.

If we totaled all of the articles written in 2011 in the B2B world, it would make you think that there is nothing happening after this so called 70 % window where buyers don't want sales interaction.

I thought it might be useful if I were to reproduce on my blog the two responses that I wrote, although only after eliminating any reference to participants in the discussion (this is a private listserv), editing, and extending for clarity.

However, on Oct. 15, perhaps after a job interview, the woman writes to Biderman, «I think it went well, however I don't think it's the right kind of environment for me.

He also studies the history of political thought and is now writing a monograph on English libertarian Thomas Hodgskin after having written mainly on Herbert Spencer and Antonio Rosmini.

As I wrote in my Personal Capital review after sitting down with CEO Bill Harris for 1.5 hours, I think the business model of leveraging technology to gather and manage assets is a no brainer.

Shortly after Mr. Paulson's Monday speech a Dutch economics professor, Dirk Bezemer, wrote me that: «In my thinking I liken it to a Ponzi game where in the final stages the only way to keep things going a bit longer is to pump in more liquidity.

John wrote: «after careful thought, 98 % of the population decided they disagree with you.»

The changing «ways» in the Bible (written by man) also can't seem to explain why incest is bad (not that I condone it), yet, how do you think Adam and Eve procreated after them?

We think, in contrast to Saverin and Loyola, of Christopher Hitchens» moving essay «For Patriot Dreams,» written after 9/11, when he announces his desire to become a citizen of this country, not because he seeks any gain» he was already successful as an expatriate Brit» but because the murder of so many Americans had made him realize that he already felt the citizen's love for this nation.

After reading, reviewing, and writing on Hannah Arendt, I have come to think of her, fairly or otherwise, as a special voice, one of many» they range from Thomas Mann to Karl Jaspers to Marlene Dietrich» who came through the fires of hell called Nazi Germany with their consciences intact.

As late as 1790, after years of otherwise progressive thought and effort in such areas as poverty, unemployment, prisons and slavery, John Wesley could write:

He died before I was born, but I thought as long as I was plagiarizing the book of Matthew (also written after His death), I'd just add this whole 3:16 part in because those silly jews don't think Jesus was actually the messiah (who cares if he didn't really fulfill all the required prophecies.

Now that we think of it, the flyer was written not too long after Anthony Hopkins played the serial killer Hannibal Lecter in The Silence of the Lambs, but we don't know if that means anything.

You know, I promised myself not to come back here, but yesterday I read the responses after writing and there has been so much judgement towards my husband's comments & mine that I felt I needed to write a few more thoughts before I Never come back again!

After all that has been written about the 2014 Grammys, I find myself thinking about God's presence at the event.

Well, its funny because after I got married, people kept quoting my book [The Irresistible Revolution] to me, and I thought, well, maybe I need to go back and read what I wrote!

Probably they were both written between fifty and sixty years after the events that they record, and I am inclined to think that the order is Luke - Matthew.

If you think it was written 300 years after his death, that may be true without meaning he wasn't a real person.

The absence of this metaphor corresponds with the broader movement of ecumenical social thought which, after a mid-century period of neo-orthodoxy, has headed, Paul Bock writes, «back in the direction of humanism» and taken a more hopeful view of the secular prospect.

Joseph Bottum writes: After six years of President Bush» thought by nearly every observer to be the most socially conservative president of recent decades» where does social conservatism stand?

Actually, I think the most accurate would be to state that the anonymous author who wrote the gospel of John attributed those words to Jesus that he or she received second hand (or more) and didn't bother to put into writing until at least many decades after the words were said.

the writers gained NO money and power from writing it... sorry... your argument is weak and baseless... and the 4 Gospels were written from about 15 to 30 years after Jesus... pretty ignorant to think it was 40 to 80..

In «Thoughts after Lambeth» Eliot wrote, «The World is trying the experiment of attempting to form a civilized but non-Christian mentality.

One might think that an actual resurrection would have been captured immediately in a contemporaneous written record corroborated by many, many independent Jewish and Roman sources rather than a few vested 2nd hand accounts decades after the alleged event.

After reading the publisher's description, I had written something critical about the book on our weblog First Thoughts, citing the publisher's description.

To say that the claims that are based off of a book were created after the book was first written is just stupid (maybe your argument isn't what you typed and you made an error in trying to convey your thoughts).

Yes, I think I wrote this post after I read that chapter from «Exiles.»

After what I wrote yesterday, I think I'll take your post today as confirmation that thinking for myself minus the fear has me on the right track.

You can't tell what Jesus thinks and feels by reading second and third - hand accounts written decades after his death.

We thought about that when stumbling across an article by Mary Gordon in the Nation, written shortly after Bill Clinton's election.

I was asked to write this paper chiefly, I think, because, after participating in the Workgroup's 1982 Christian Theology, I called it a swan song.

MOST events in history are written after they happen, so how do you think it should have been?

After a few months of use, I passed on my Lamy Safari pen to someone I thought might enjoy using it, and bought a nicer pen with a finer nib, more suited to my writing style.

Bonhoeffer's diary records two different episodes during this brief period: «I do not understand why I am here... The short prayer in which we thought of our German brothers almost overwhelmed me... If things become more uncertain, I shall not stay in America...» Later, after his decision to return home, he wrote, «Since I came on board ship, my mental turmoil about the future has gone.

Note: After doing a lot of reading, research, and thinking on the topics in this post, I wrote a follow - up post about the pagan roots of Christianity here and some of my concluding thoughts about Zeitgeist the movie.