To read about this inspiring movement see Climate Hope: On the Front Lines of the Fight
Against Coal by Ted Nace.
Not exact matches
After all, the Federal Liberals had already stepped on the scale to try to support Clark, when, in mid-campaign, they sent out a public letter suggesting they would consider her suggestion of retaliating
against the U.S.
by slapping counter tariff on American thermal
coal.
For instance regulations that are going to cripple the
coal industry were voted
against by Democrats from
coal mining areas, despite their party's significant support for the measure.
This first document from 1977 was written
by Nicholas Ridley and explains how they would denationalise the state, subvert the Unions, use the security services of the state
against organised Labour, and build up stocks of
coal to take on the miners.
Indian
coal plants under the CDM received financial backing from the World Bank, sparking an outcry
against that organization
by groups that argue that the bank's support for the
coal industry is inconsistent with its other efforts to tackle climate change.
A study
by the World Resources Institute last October showed 51 percent of planned
coal - power plants in China were in regions with severe water shortages, potentially pitting energy production
against agriculture and basic needs for clean water.
Among priorities in 2011, the government intends to make headway
against two diseases that hit China hard: hepatitis B and skeletal fluorosis, which is caused
by inhalation of fluorine given off
by home
coal stoves.
Holmstead was dismissed
by a federal judge as an expert witness in a lawsuit brought
by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
against Ameren Missouri, a
coal burning utility.
For this reason many Modernists of the postwar generation felt that they were the most important bulwark
against totalitarianism, the «canary in the
coal mine», whose repression
by a government or other group with supposed authority represented a warning that individual liberties were being threatened.
For those who have lived in China recently, choking on the world's most notorious
coal - produced pollution, the gauze invokes the frail barrier offered
by masks
against the toxins.
A clear focus is the research center run
by the agency's star climatologist, James E. Hansen, who has variously been hailed and attacked for becoming a prominent campaigner
against coal and oil use.
by Mark Krebs, Spire Energy, and E&E Legal's Tom Tanton As Appearing in MasterResource «What Secretary Perry has yet to recognize is that the same hostile forces behind the «war
against coal» are now focused on eliminating the direct use of natural gas....
As a longtime fighter
against the oil and
coal interests that bankroll climate skeptics, I am delighted
by Desmogblog's posting of the Heartland disinformation documents.
As these alternative ways are competing
against a set of products — in essence, two: petrochemical fuels and
coal — that are subsidized
by being allowed to use up the scarce resource of the carbon cycle's ability to cope with waste CO2E, the Market is not fair, and does not run according to Capitalist precepts, without such a carbon price.
[1] They are up
against a formidable array of political, corporate, and cultural forces that is reminiscent of what the miners were up
against 90 years ago — with the added threats of global climatic disruption from
coal - burning and the devastating assault on the mountains and environment of Appalachia
by destructive modern technology.
On June 8, supporters of the March on Blair Mountain
against mountaintop removal
coal mining rallied outside the Environmental Protection Agency headquarters in Washington, DC, praising EPA for recent actions while skewering,
by name, high - level pro-industry elected officials from Appalachia.
[2] The proposed
coal terminal is being opposed
by environmental groups, which have filed legal challenges
against the county permit approving the project.
«I'd let them stand on their own and compete
against coal and natural gas and other sources, and let utilities make real - time market decisions on those types of things as opposed to being propped up
by tax incentives and other types of credits that occur, both in the federal level and state level.»
The National Mining Association has argued
against limiting mercury emissions
by stating (34) «Regulations designed to further reduce mercury emissions must not jeopardize the nation's ability to utilize this domestic strategic energy resource and must not disadvantage any specific
coal rank in the marketplace.»
Bonner had been hired
by a PR firm, the Hawthorn Group, to lobby
against the bill
by the American Coalition for Clean
Coal Electricity.
So CAGW + greenhouse gasses is an invention funded
by the oil / nuclear interests who were plotting
against coal is it?
Your Keitho tactic is no different than that used
by coal companies
against the nuclear industry in the 70's and 80's — except rather than being a
coal lobbyist, you are a political ideologue.
The Bureau of Land Management has leased to the
coal industry 400 million tons of
coal on federal land in the Powder River Basin in Wyoming, and the administration has defended the decision
against a court challenge
by environmental groups.
A coalition of groups, including some that were impersonated
by coal lobbyists fighting
against U.S. climate change legislation, have banded together in search of further evidence of wrongdoing in the ballooning fraudulent letter scandal.
They knew it would be decades until they could harvest olives again, but their field is now covered
by the same type of tree that sustained generations — and now marks the power of people
against coal.
In some underground mines,
by design a portion of the
coal is left intact as pillars to protect
against surface collapse.
On March 2, 2010 the EPA announced that it had granted a Clean Water Act permit for the Hobet 45 mine in Lincoln County, West Virginia after Hobet Mining LLC, a company owned
by Patriot
Coal, had agreed to additional «significant protections»
against environmental impacts.
Despite Michael Bloomberg's best efforts, and the market economics working
against it,
coal could still make a small come back, though, especially if Trump rigs the rules of the game in favour of
coal by re-writing US domestic power rules and slashing solar tariffs.
With a scrubber in place, a plant using high - sulfur
coal can reduce its need to buy and surrender SO2 emissions permits
by 90 % or more compared to a plant using the same fuel without a scrubber, making Illinois Basin
coal much more competitive, especially
against Central Appalachia which previously could rely on its low sulfur content as a competitive advantage.
The lawsuit, filed with with ATP's sister organization, the American Tradition Institute (ATI), argues that the RPS unconstitutionally discriminates
against coal power
by regulating commerce outside state borders — which makes it tough for utilities to import electricity from out - of - state
coal plants.
Lots of Washington voters, primed
by years of activist campaigns
against oil trains and
coal terminals in the Pacific Northwest, were ready for climate action.
Earthjustice is litigating in Ohio
against proposals
by two major utilities to force customers to prop up eight outdated power plants — seven
coal and one nuclear — for the next 15 to 35 years.
Critics will say that some of the market forces acting in favor of gas
against coal for EPG are market distortions brought to you
by an overeager EPA — that the new air quality standards are unnecessary and if removed will level the playing field back toward
coal.
As can be seen, the 58 % - efficient CCGT is already running ahead of a 43 % - efficient lignite plant from a carbon price of $ 40 / t, while
by contrast the 45 % - efficient CCGT is still uncompetitive
against both 43 % - lignite and 46 %
coal even at a price of $ 60 / t.
And it leaves no backstop to protect
against moves
by a Republican president to prop up the
coal industry.
A protest
against a
coal plant project two years ago in Sompeta in the eastern coastal state of Andhra Pradesh turned violent, with two farmers killed
by police and several others wounded.
Holmstead was dismissed
by a federal judge as an expert witness in a lawsuit brought
by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
against Ameren Missouri, a
coal burning utility.
Given all that I've dug up on the origins of the «industry - corrupted skeptic climate scientists» accusation, I'd call it a can't - lose wager if you bet that the «e-mail message circulated at a U.S. climate research lab» which Myanna Lahsen referred to owes its «funded
by the oil and
coal industry» accusation
against skeptic climate scientists to Gelbspan / Ozone Action.
And all this brings increasing recognition
by investors that the carbon bubble and stranded assets are serious financial risks, which in turn reinforces the growing power of NGO campaigns
against coal and CSG along with their fossil fuel divestment campaign.
The first link in my article takes readers to a prior one where I show how the very same Sheldon Rampton appeared before a US House hearing and regurgitated an accusation phrase
against skeptic scientists that was made famous
by anti-skeptic book author Ross Gelbspan and the enviro - advocacy group Ozone Action in 1996 - 7 — these people have every appearance of being the epicenter of the accusation that skeptic scientists operate under a
coal / oil industry directive to fabricate false assessments in exchange for mega-millions...... an accusation that has no evidence to support it that I can find, and its central piece of evidence is a 1991
coal industry memo that no one is allowed to see in its complete context.
He expressed the sentiment in a media briefing organized
by clean energy group RE-AMP, arguing
against a proposed
coal plant in Marshalltown, Iowa.
In what turned out to be a whirlwind year, our activities ranged from bursting the gigantic balloon of 13 gigatonnes CO2 - equivalent of «hot air», to achieving a major victory
against coal power projects in the CDM, to helping local communities negatively affected
by CDM projects to be heard at international level.
by Tim Ryan Courthouse News Service WASHINGTON (CN)-- Missing statutory deadlines drew federal complaints Monday
against the Environmental Protection Agency both from conservationists and a
coal - funded right - wing think tank... In the same court Monday, the EPA was hit with a federal complaint
by... the Energy and Environment Legal Institute.
The high efficiency, modular capability and low capital cost reduces cost over conventional nuclear
by 30 % making it competitive
against gas and
coal fired plants.
«At best, you're going to tread water on the carbon issue, and you're probably going to do worse,» said Howard Herzog, a principal research engineer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a co-author of «The Future of
Coal,» a voluminous study published in March
by M.I.T. «It goes
against the whole grain of reducing carbon.»
Hundreds of people turned out to support EPA and these safeguards
against the toxins spewed out
by coal plants — toxins that adversely affect public health.
He railed
against a political «war on
coal» supposedly waged
by President Obama, one Trump claimed was «killing American jobs.»
And while the President lectures us about our sins
against the planet, his EPA and other agencies embark on the project to impose penance on us
by forcing the closure of
coal and other fossil fuel power plants, blocking pipelines, bankrupting the
coal mining industry, subsidizing intermittent power sources that can't possibly run a fully operational electrical grid at reasonable cost, and multiplying our cost of electricity
by an order of magnitude or so.
Represented Canadian utility in
coal supply dispute
against its supplier who claimed force majeure based on expropriation
by Latin American country
Defense of a leading specialty chemical manufacturer
against medical monitoring claims brought
by coal workers allegedly exposed to polyacrylamide