Energy In Depth, the communications and research arm of the Independent Petroleum Association of America, published a lengthy response to the Integrity Project's report and criticized it for including diesel use that occurred prior to a 2014 Environmental Protection
Agency rule clarifying the types of chemicals considered «diesel fuels.»
Not exact matches
On March 6, 2018, Judge Jack B. Weinstein of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
ruled that virtual currencies are commodities under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and therefore subject to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's (CFTC) anti-fraud and anti-manipulation enforcement authority.1 Granting the CFTC's request for a preliminary injunction against the defendants who allegedly engaged in deception and fraud involving virtual currency spot markets, Judge Weinstein noted that «[u] ntil Congress
clarifies the matter,» the CFTC has «concurrent authority» along with other state and federal administrative
agencies and civil and criminal courts over transactions in virtual currency.2
«The FDA agrees additional time is necessary for the
agency to provide further
clarifying guidance to help facilitate efficient compliance across all covered businesses and for covered establishments to come into compliance with the final
rule,» Taylor added.
The order, which the White House did not immediately make public, will kick off what will likely be a lengthy process to undo the Waters of the United States (WOTUS)
rule, finalized by the Environmental Protection
Agency and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in 2015 to
clarify which bodies of water are covered by the Clean Water Act.
With all the attention on school layoffs this month comes a recent
ruling from the California Court of Appeal further
clarifying the duties of a local educational
agency when it comes to distinguishing probationary» employees from «temporary» employees.»
The U.S. Department of Transportation's (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) today issued a guidance memorandum
clarifying the
agency's final
rule from June 2, 2016, which removed the packing group (PG) II designation for Organic Peroxides, and Self - Reactive Substances in the Hazardous Materials Table (HMT).
Following the Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. EPA, 549 U.S. 497 (2007)-- which
clarified that greenhouse gases are an «air pollutant» subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act (CAA)-- the Environmental Protection
Agency promulgated a series of greenhouse gas - related
rules.
The case is being closely watched due, in part, to the involvement of the company's corporate bodies in the United States, its Swiss affiliate and because «practitioners are hoping the courts will
clarify the interplay between major elements of Canada's transfer pricing
rules, as well as the appropriateness of the Canada Revenue
Agency's aggressive approach to transfer pricing disputes.»
fm.: From Wikipedia: in government, typically a regulation specifically means a piece of the delegated legislation drafted by subject matter experts to enforce a statutory instrument (primary legislation) in business, industry self - regulation occurs through self - regulatory organizations and trade associations which allow industries to set
rules with less government involvement The Act that authorizes the
Agency would thus be the Legislative creation of Administrative Law (they give authority to enact the regulations as they see fit AND can further
clarify through oversight power.)
Comment: One commenter recommended
clarifying in the final
rule that the government health data system provisions apply to: (1) Manufacturers providing data to HCFA and its contractors to help the
agency make reimbursement and related decisions; and to (2) third - party payors that must provide data collected by device manufacturers to HCFA to help the
agency make reimbursement and related decisions.
Comment: One commenter recommended
clarifying in the final
rule that covered entities are not required to establish business partner contracts with health oversight
agencies or public health authorities to release individually identifiable information to them for purposes exempt from HIPAA and sanctioned by state law.
We
clarify for purposes of the final
rule that accreditation
agencies are business associates of a covered entity and are explicitly included within the definition.
Two commenters recommended
clarifying in the final
rule that disclosure is allowed to all federal, state, and local
agencies that use protected health information to carry out legally mandated responsibilities.
Comment: One commenter recommended
clarifying in the final
rule that it does not restrict law enforcement
agencies» release of medical information that many state records laws require to be reported, for example, as part of autopsy reports.
We
clarify that the Department of Defense or any other federal
agency and any non-governmental organization acting on its behalf, is not subject to this
rule when it provides health care in another country to foreign national beneficiaries.
The Roundtable and our coalition partners support regulatory
agencies» efforts to promote economically responsible CRE lending, and the Pittenger - Scott bill will help guide the
agencies in
clarifying and reforming the HVCRE
Rule, while encouraging sound lending practices, spurring economic growth and creating jobs in local communities.»
The
rules apply to private entities and not the state - owned banks or government institutions, the department
clarified in an announcement quoted by Belta news
agency.
Find out if your role is included within the scope of the new
rules — most
agency workers are going to be included, but if an
agency worker is genuinely self - employed, or is unsure, then they need to
clarify the type of arrangements they are under.
However, the fact that legislators on both sides of the aisle have recognized the need to
clarify the HVCRE
rule may give the regulatory
agencies a nudge to deliver needed guidance.
The first set of amendments, proposed in April 2013 and published on July 24, 2013,
clarify, correct, or amend provisions on the relation to State law of Regulation X's servicing provisions; implementation dates for adjustable rate mortgage servicing; exclusions from requirements on higher - priced mortgage loans; the small servicer exemption from certain servicing
rules; the use of government - sponsored enterprise and Federal
agency purchase, guarantee or insurance eligibility for determining qualified mortgage status; and the determination of debt and income for purposes of originating qualified mortgages.