Sentences with phrase «agreement means for business»

Not exact matches

For instance, while recent grads and business leaders might be in agreement about millennial preparedness, they differ some in defining what it means to be prepared.

That means a business owner can't use the same invoices as collateral for a different loan unless a subordination agreement is in effect.

I thought for a few hours this might be a good thing anyway, but now suspect that the lack of a real - deal on PR will mean that Clegg can't do business - and as the other possible coalitions are unworkable, Cameron will end up trying to run a minority government with no formal agreement.

The defendant, from in or around March 2008 to in or around October 2013, in the County of Monroe, acting in concert with others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, knowingly and intentionally entered into and engaged in and continued to engage in a contract, agreement, arrangement, and combination in unreasonable restraint of combination and the free exercise of activity in the conduct of business, trade, and commerce, specifically, to restrain competition in the bidding process of Monroe County for the Public Safety Contract, by means of bid rigging.

«This contract agreement will mean better - paying jobs for local workers, created by a well - run, profitable, private sector business.

«commercial dispute» means a dispute between parties relating to matters of a commercial nature, whether contractual or not, such as trade transactions for the supply or exchange of goods or services, distribution agreements, commercial representation or agency, factoring, leasing, construction of works, consulting, engineering, licensing, investment, financing, banking, insurance, exploitation agreements and concessions, joint ventures, other forms of industrial or business co-operation or the carriage of goods or passengers; («différend commercial»)

Tim Boyce, dispute resolution partner at Osborne Clarke, says the proposals meant «good news for businesses that face claims by individuals who are supported by «no win no fee» agreements and after - the - event (ATE) insurance.

The lawsuit notes that, according to HUD, characterizing «such arrangements as «marketing» or «administrative» agreements does not render the underlying conduct legal» and that the agreements are «only a means to facilitate payments for referrals by persons in a position to refer settlement service business, in violation of RESPA.»