Sentences with phrase «akoa idem»

Gilbert Higher (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1939 - 63), vol.11; idem, Earty Christianity and Greek Paideia (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1961).

Virginia R. Mollenkott, reply to Sharon Gallagher, Sojourners S (March 1976): 37 - 38; idem, «A Challenge to Male Interpretation,» p. 22.

Ottaviani's approach to theology was neatly summarized in the Latin motto of his cardinalatial coat of arms, Semper Idem [Always the Same], and his fierce defense of what he understood to be orthodoxy made him a not - implausible model for the character of Cardinal Leone in Morris West's novel The Shoes of the Fisherman.

[10] By no means is this a peculiarly Protestant claim; cf. Karl Rahner, «Priestly Existence,» in idem, Theological Investigations, vol.3 (New York: Seabury Press, 1974); and Bernard Cooke, Ministry to Word and Sacraments (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1976), esp.

[12] Idem.

This then is called the doctrine of the God - Man or the doctrine that God and men are idem per idem [identical].

and idem, «Meletius of Lycopolis and Episcopal Succession in Egypt,» The Harvard Theological Review, XLVIII (1955) 227.

By Esseh Ikora, Uyo Abductors of Pastor Mfon Akpan Udoneke, the Area Superintendent of Ikot - Akoa Idem Apostolic church in Ukanafun local government area of Akwa...

The chosen few include Justice Aloma Marian Mukhtar (CFR), Mrs. Victoria Gowon (CFR), Senator Joy Emodi (CON), Senator Grace Folashade - Bent (CON), Mrs. Diezani Alison - Madueke (CON), Justice Dorothy N Eyamba - Idem (OFR), Justice Aisha Sani Dahiru (OFR), Justice Hauwa Kulu Aliyu (OFR), Justice Inumidun Enitan Akande (OFR), Prof Grace Alele - Williams (OFR), Mrs. Amina Sambo (OFR) and Mrs. Cecilia Akanu (OFR).

He added that the retreat was organised to appreciate the stage of each of the bills in order for the two chambers to increase the cooperation they had and be consensus ad idem.

Idem.

Idem for the exhaust single / double though they should have recorded this correctly and it also depends on the system as some cars have separate pipes for each bank, others have 2 pipes that only split at the rear which is often down to the visual balanced look...

We have a bunny and we have had problems with him chewing on wood idems in the house.

Blatant piles of consumer articles of one sort or another,» says Albert Oehlen (idem).

While working with PrintThemAll publishing Andrew Schoultz recently got an amazing opportunity to create his newest limited edition at the oldest Parisian printing house, Idem Studio.

His artistic research has long been coupled with written statements and reflections collected in artist's books: from Idem, published in 1975 by Einaudi (Turin) with a foreword by Italo Calvino, to Quattro passi.

Dreyer, Nikolaj Contemporary Art Center, Copenhagen, DK «Les Coups», Œuvres du FRAC Bourgogne, FRAC Dijon, FR Unconvention, Center for Visual Arts, Cardiff, Wales, UK Millennium Messages, organised by Smithsonian Institution Traveling Exhibition Service, Heckscher Museum of Art, Huntington, New York, US; traveled to Tufts University Gallery, Medford, Massachusetts, US; Everson Museum of Art, Syracuse, New York, US; Miami University Art Museum, Oxford, Ohio, US Other Rooms, Other Voices, Printed Matter, New York, US Entre Centre et Absence, Centre d'Art Contemporain Passage, Troyes, FR; Stadtgalerie Saarbrücken, Saarbrück, DE; Kunst - halle Erfut, DE; Städtische Galerie, Erlangen, DE; Musée Paul Dini, Villefranche - sur - Saône, FR Idem, Mai 36 Galerie, Zurich, CH http://auction.thing.net, The Thing, Inc, New York, US 54x54x54, Museum of Contemporary Art / Financial Times Building, London, UK; traveled to Zurich, CH; Vancouver, CA

This does not mean that Greenland will not continue to melt (it will very probably on long term) and sea - level wil not continue to rise (idem).

They come up with all kinds of hypothetical feedback mechanisms involving more natural aerosol emissions in response to global warming: Dimethylsulfide from marine phytoplankton (although a very intriguing possibility, this has never been confirmed to be a significant feedback mechanism, and there is ample evidence to the contrary, which is omitted from the report), biological aerosols (idem), carbonyl sulfide (idem), nitrous oxide (idem), and iodocompounds (idem), about which they write the following: «Iodocompounds — created by marine algae — function as cloud condensation nuclei, which help create new clouds that reflect more incoming solar radiation back to space and thereby cool the planet.»

-- The enforcement condition of Article 54 CISA does not call into question the essence of ne bis in idem as such as it is laid down in Article 50 Charter (§ 58).

Affirming that a partial execution of an autonomous part of a composed penalty can neither fulfil the «enforcement process», the CJEU considerably stretched the scope of the condition and limited the protection offered by the ne bis in idem principle.

The decision of the CJEU further expands the concept of «final decision'triggering the ne bis in idem, confirming the validity of the previously consolidated trend which, on the one hand, recognises a strong importance to the mutual trust between Member States, and on the other hand acknowledges the inherent link between ne bis in idem and the freedom of movement in the EU.

Yet what is more, since the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the ne bis in idem principle has become a yardstick of the systemic impact of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CFREU) on secondary EU law.

In doing so, the CJEU seems, on the one hand, to endorse a new (be it a more «mistrustful» or, from a different standpoint, perhaps more «realistic») understanding of mutual trust and, on the other hand, to overlook the protective rationale of ne bis in idem and the logic of its previous case - law.

The CJEU may increase the safeguards for suspects — as it has been doing for some ten years now — extending the concept of a «final decision'triggering the application of the ne bis in idem principle.

In other words, it is a final decision according to the EU legal framework on ne bis in idem, namely Article 54 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement (CISA).

Although in Spasic the partial execution concerned the financial component of the composed penalty, an indiscriminate application of the Court's assumption could undermine the protective function of ne bis in idem, which constitutes, in terms of proportionality, part of its essence.

Ne bis in idem is a fundamental principle of EU criminal law, protecting citizens against double prosecution, even in transnational situations.

In conclusion, the Spasic judgment places a strong focus on the duty to prevent the impunity of criminals within the AFSJ and, apparently, shifts the balance of ne bis in idem towards a more «security - oriented» approach.

It looks at the interplay between administrative and criminal enforcement systems and at possible issues concerning ne bis in idem.

It also repeats the potential tension with the principle of ne bis in idem.

However, just last month, the Novenergia tribunal held that the Commission's state aid decision is not relevant in the proceedings because the tribunal «was not applying EU law» (para. 465), with the Commission's decision being «entirely irrelevant to the determinations pertaining to this Tribunal» (idem.).

Moreover, it often repeats itself when discussing whether or not administrative procedures and sanctions can be considered criminal, making one wonder why none of the other aspects of ne bis in idem are discussed, for example its application in transnational cases.

Chapter 10 (by Martin Böse) then discusses one procedural safeguard that is closely linked to the risk of the consecutive application of different types of sanctions: the principle of ne bis in idem.

On several occasions the Court has affirmed that the only relevant criterion to determine what idem is, is the identity of the material acts, rejecting the criteria based on the legal qualification of the acts or the legal interests protected.

The Advocate General recalls that the ne bis in idem in the EU is also essential to ensure the freedom of movement of citizens (otherwise they could fear another prosecution in other Member States) and it must work even when national systems are different and not harmonised.

Probably some room to deny the applicability of the ne bis in idem could be rather found in the «final» character of the decision, rather than in the nature of the decision (i.e. whether or not it involves an appreciation of the merits of the case).

This case concerns the scope of the ne bis in idem, whose multi-faceted rationale does not include the protection of victims» rights and interests.

Ruling out the exceptions to the ne bis in idem (based on national interests) would certainly contribute to the development of the AFSJ.

In that case, which lead to the preliminary reference, Mr Åkerberg Fransson submitted that these criminal charges should be dismissed on the ground that he had already been punished for those acts and that these criminal proceedings were therefore in violation of the ne bis in idem principle laid down in article 50 of the Charter.

Furthermore, it would risk undermining the cross-border protection offered by the EU ne bis in idem.

The view of the Advocate General, whereby a different legal element — concerning for example the intention of the perpetrator — could entail that the «acts» (Article 54 CISA) or the «offence» (Article 50 CFREU) are not the same for the purpose of ne bis in idem, is not entirely persuasive as regards its coherence with the previous CJEU case law.

On the other hand, the CJEU might disagree on the Advocate General's reasoning to justify the answer, where it is argued that the interpretation of the concept of same «act» and «offence» already leaves much room to national authorities to consider the ne bis in idem not applicable.

In other words, according to the Advocate General the interpretation of one of the core elements of the ne bis in idem (the «same acts») already leaves quite broad possibilities for national authorities not to consider the material acts as the same offence, thus not necessarily triggering the protection of ne bis in idem.

Both questions are crucial for the development of a consistent EU case law on the principle of ne bis in idem.

They would indeed create an obstacle to the objectives of the ne bis in idem, in particular the freedom of movement in the EU (Van Esbroeck, C - 436 / 04, 9 March 2006, § 36; Gasparini, C - 467 / 04, 29 September 2006, § 54; Van Straaten, C - 150 / 05, 28 September 2006, § 48; Kretzinger, C - 288 / 05, 18 July 2007, § 34; Kraaijenbrink, C - 367 / 05, 18 July 2007, § 36).

In this way, the Advocate General stresses how the interpretation of «idem» already allows national authorities to take into consideration substantial differences between offences («le respect de la différence substantielle des infractions», § 67).

In that regard, the limitation provided by Article 55 would not only risk emptying the content of ne bis in idem principle, but it is neither necessary, nor useful to «meet objectives of general interest recognised by the Union».

In Bonda and Åkerberg Fransson, the CJEU clarified that, also according to the CFREU, if the first administrative sanction is criminal in nature, then the EU ne bis in idem principle applies, and this should be directly assessed by the national judge — without waiting for the enactment of new legislation.

Ever since the Engel judgment, the ECtHR has clarified that the national label is not the only criterion to assess the nature of an afflictive measure, and the situation might occur in which a formally administrative measure should be considered criminal in nature, thereby triggering the safeguards provided by criminal law (including the ne bis in idem: see also Grande Stevens v. Italy).