Sentences with phrase «alarmist scenarios of»

Alarmist scenarios of very large temperature rises and sea level increase are not supported by mainstream science.

Not exact matches

This is distinctly alarmist... It is common ground that if indeed Greenland melted, it would release this amount of water, but only after, and over, millennia, so that the Armageddon scenario he predicts, insofar as it suggests that sea level rises of 7 metres might occur in the immediate future, is not in line with the scientific consensus.

Since we (you, me, the IPCC) all are in agreement as to the likelihood of the rate of (near) future temperature change, the real impetus in your call for a wager should be geared towards calling out the alarmists — those folks who entertain the idea that the IPCC extreme temperature change scenarios are the most probable.

Of course some alarmism - addicted readers will insist that we ignore these findings, and blindly accept the alarmist scenarios.

Paul D... As a part - time alarmist I would answer that with a little bit of extrapolation added to some warnings of climate scientists I guess the worst case scenario at least includes the total collapse of the WAIS, creating tsunamis at least all over the Pacific rim, the subsequent sea level rise of c. 7m will destroy most of the remaining harbours, communication centers near coasts, next up would be the melting of the collapsed ice in the southern ocean altering the climate of the entire southern hemisphere, making it near - impossible to guess what areas are good for similar agriculture as before, leading to massive movements of people.

The system faces bankruptcy, but talk of reform always stirs up alarmist scenarios in which seniors will be made to surrender some of their benefits.

THE only place where such catastrophic scenarios exist are in the warped minds of alarmist hysterics who occupy the climate controlled offices of NASA, NOAA, BoM, National Geographic and the New York Times et al..

In fact, there are far more documented instances of the AR4 being too conservative, rather than too alarmist, on emissions scenarios, sea level rise, and Arctic sea - ice melt.

The Montreal Protocol was done under the same «Oh My God, we've GOT to DO something — NOW or we'll all FRY» type of scenario that the alarmists are trying to perpetrate today.

Yet because he rejects the alarmist scenarios touted by the media and alarmist IPCC scientists, the Swedish professor has long been the target of vicious attack campaigns aimed at discrediting him — yet to little effect.

There is serious probability of famines due to political mismanagement, far greater than any alarmist catestrophic global warming scenarios.

Suffice to say the widespread misunderstanding of the article's rationale (of course it is alarmist; it is deliberately exploring worst case scenarios, it is meant to be alarming), was, to borrow Robert's term, irksome.

-LSB-...] via Speak of the devil: Alarmist scientists issue call for scary scenarios at AGU conference «Green He....

Of course, this led to dramatically alarmist predictions of temperature under a «business as usual» scenariOf course, this led to dramatically alarmist predictions of temperature under a «business as usual» scenariof temperature under a «business as usual» scenario.

Given the increasing realisation that climate mitigation efforts are creating an economic crisis, and increasing popular scepticism about the alarmist scenario, this is a timely publication, and a key resource for all of us who are arguing for common sense.

As it turns out, these alarmists were pushing (and still are) a unicorn - type of science, based on fantasy climate change scenarios, which almost all have failed to happen.

Based on the model outputs from 1960 to the present, policymakers and the public would be better served by rejecting the alarmist scenarios A and B; instead, moving forward, base all adaption and mitigation policies on Scenario «C», which would likely produce better outcomes with superior allocation of scarce resources.

(More cynically, even if we «do nothing» about the crisis de jour and nothing happens said alarmists may have the gall to claim that by «raising awareness of the problem» they still somehow managed to avert it - «and you can make the check out to...») Even worse, alarmists project out that terrible things will happen if we don't take IMMEDIATE (and highly expensive) action to avert the crisis by assuming the worst - case scenario.

Since the «runaway» and «accelerating» scenarios have been ginormous scientific failures, as previously discussed, AGW scientists and alarmists / advocates are having to seriously re-think the basic assumptions of catastrophic global warming.

Whatever their reasons, many if not most leading alarmist scientists, like Jones, preferred the approach made notorious by the late Stephen Schneider to get public support: «We have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have.»

They are certainly the only factors that climate activists and alarmists want to talk about, and use to generate scary «scenarios» that are presented as actual predictions of future calamities — while they attempt to silence debate, criticism and skepticism.

Like Pinkers, Boisvert tries to factor in what climate alarmists ignore: the capability of human beings to react to changing scenarios in remarkably ingenious ways.

Plibersek takes the most alarmist interpretation of the most alarmist climate change scenarios out there.

You will be used to push Moore's view that America is the source of all evil in the world, as well as the usual crazy alarmist scenarios (runaway greenhouse, etc).

The most depressing feature of this debate is that anyone who questions the alarmist, doomsday scenario will automatically be labelled a climate change «denier», and accused of jeopardising the future of humanity.

These scenarios of cartel attacks against the bitcoin network may seem alarmist, but they are very real possibilities lurking behind the SegWit door.