-LSB-...] via Speak of the devil:
Alarmist scientists issue call for scary scenarios at AGU conference «Green He....
Not exact matches
Regarding the
issue of whether some «mainstream»
scientists are «
alarmist» in their discussions of global warming, it is well to remember that, in any controversy, scientific or otherwise, there will be extremists at both ends of the spectrum.
* There is too much conflicting evidence about climate change to know whether it is actually happening * Current climate change is part of a pattern that has been going on for millions of years * Climate change is just a natural fluctuation in Earth's temperatures * Even if we do experience some consequences from climate change, we will be able to cope with them * The effects of climate change are likely to be catastrophic * The evidence for climate change is unreliable * There are a lot of very different theories about climate change
and little agreement about which is right * Scientists have in the past changed their results to make climate change appear worse than it is * Scientists have hidden research that shows climate change is not serious * Climate change is a scam * Social / behavioural scepticism measures * Climate change is so complicated, that there is very little politicians can do about it * There is no point in me doing anything about climate change because no - one else is * The actions of a single person doesn't make any difference in tackling climate change * People are too selfish to do anything about climate change * Not much will be done about climate change, because it is not in human nature to respond to problems that won't happen for many years * It is already too late to do anything about climate change * The media is often too alarmist about climate change * Environmentalists do their best to emphasise the worst possible effects of climate change * Climate change has now become a bit of an outdated issue * Whether it is important or not, on a day - to - day basis I am bored of hearing about climate change
Note 2: A
scientist discusses the IPCC hotspot
issue and dismantles a lame pro-hotspot argument (geesh, talk about
alarmists» «scientific» mis - truths).
The three lead NIPCC authors — Craig Idso, Robert M. Carter, and S. Fred Singer — reveal how no survey or study shows a «consensus» on the most important scientific
issues in the climate change debate, and how most
scientists do not support the
alarmist claims of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
In November, 2015, the three lead NIPCC authors — Craig Idso, Robert M. Carter, and S. Fred Singer — wrote a small book titled Why
Scientists Disagree About Global Warming: The NIPCC Report on Scientific Consensus revealing how no survey or study shows a «consensus» on the most important scientific issues in the climate change debate, and how most scientists do not support the alarmist claims of the Intergovernmental Panel on Clima
Scientists Disagree About Global Warming: The NIPCC Report on Scientific Consensus revealing how no survey or study shows a «consensus» on the most important scientific
issues in the climate change debate, and how most
scientists do not support the alarmist claims of the Intergovernmental Panel on Clima
scientists do not support the
alarmist claims of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
It's understandable to take that position when
alarmists are telling you things like don't have more kids and extreme things like that, but at the same time just because
scientists were wrong about global freezing in the 70s doesn't mean the current climate change
issue isn't worth giving serious thought.
Over the past decade
alarmist climate
scientists — including the top figures in the field — have been deliberately misleading the public on many climate
issues.
In addition to globe trotting activist
alarmist scientists (some of whom are fully funded by tax dollats) failing miserably to» walk the talk» we also have political candidates
issuing inane comments and sound bites regarding the absolute unanimity of the scientific community worldwide regarding a certainty of anthropogenic catastrophic climate change.