Sentences with phrase «alberta justice court»

Not exact matches

«I frankly don't know how I am going to come up with the rest of the money,» Thomson told Sun News Network's Brian Lilley on Byline.Canada's justice system has a knack for punishing people for defending themselves and their property, often called «castle law.MORE: Court drops final charge against Ontario man who fired shots to protect his home under attack by firebombers Joseph and Marilyn Singleton of Taber, Alberta spent $ 30,000 in cCourt drops final charge against Ontario man who fired shots to protect his home under attack by firebombers Joseph and Marilyn Singleton of Taber, Alberta spent $ 30,000 in courtcourt.

The research report suggests that a working group be established, with representation from family law practitioners, mediators and arbitrators, judges, and representatives from Alberta Justice and court administration, to develop a pilot early neutral evaluation program for use in family law disputes.

Alberta Court of Queen's Bench Justice Paul Belzil was asked to decide earlier this year whether a delay of approximately 33 months before trial was sufficient to stay charges against three men facing multiple offences including robbery and aggravated assault.

Justice Beverly Browne, of the Court of Queen's Bench Alberta, allowed an appeal of the order, which would have compelled Fort McMurray Today columnist Kevin Thornton to disclose the identity of a source who provided information for columns he wrote about Alberta - based firm Stringam Denecky LLP.

He has acted on matters before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench, and the Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench.

Click here for information from Alberta Justice's website about filing an application at Provincial Court.

She said Alberta needs to do more on the justice side of the issue akin to projects in Ontario that provide four hours of free legal advice for anyone who has experienced sexual violence and is considering going to the criminal courts.

In Alberta, Morris was followed by Justice Jack Watson in R v Sapara, 2002 ABQB 321, at paras. 204 - 24, a decision not cited by the Paryniuk court.

Today, West Coast LEAF is in Calgary for the start of the judicial inquiry into remarks made by Justice Robin Camp during a sexual assault trial in Alberta provincial court in 2014.

Dawson says there's a «clear disparity» in the way funding is allocated to different parts of the criminal justice system in Alberta, such as policing, corrections, courts services, prosecution services and Legal Aid services.

n Baier v Alberta, 2007 SCC 31 [Baier], Justice Rothstein of the Supreme Court of Canada articulated a test for whether an underinclusive statutory platform of expression infringes section 2 (b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and thus whether a claimant has a positive entitlement to access that platform.

They include Justice Brian O'Ferrall, who has sat in the provincial court since 2005; Rodney Jerke, former Law Society of Alberta president who practises civil litigation; Peter Michalyshyn, a partner at Chatwin LLP in Edmonton; and David Gates, senior counsel with Justice Canada in Calgary.

The members are: Chief Justice of Alberta Catherine Fraser, (Chairperson); Chief Justice of Ontario Warren Winkler; Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island Chief Justice Jacqueline Matheson; Barry Adams of Chown Cairns in St. Catharines, Ont.; and Marie - Claude Landry Landry Boucher & Associés in Cowansville, Que.

We have begun to spread word about the project to various justice system stakeholders and potential client referral sources, including legal clinics, court workers and Legal Aid Alberta.

Canadian Minister of Justice and Attorney General Jody Wilson - Raybould has announced another round of judicial appointments to Federal Courts and for Ontario, Quebec, British Columbia and Alberta.

Interestingly, the Court compared the subject clause to the lawyer's approval condition considered by the Alberta Court of Appeal in Castledowns Law Office Management Ltd v Fastrack Technologies Inc., in which Justice Slatter (in dissent) rejected submissions that the lawyer's disapproval must be based on «purely legal considerations.»

This decision was written by Justice Brown, while he was on the Alberta Court of Appeal.

The Canadian Judicial Council is investigating a complaint brought by the Attorney General of Alberta that calls for Justice Camp's removal from the office of Federal Court judge, a position to which he was later appointed.

Heading into pre-Canada Day celebrations Justice Minister Peter MacKay announced 39 new judges on June 26 for courts across the country including Nunavut, Quebec (14), Manitoba (4), British Columbia (2), Ontario (8), Alberta (3), the Federal Court (4), Federal Court of Appeal (2) and the Tax Court.

Alberta Court of Queen's Bench Justice Frederica L. Schutz has been elevated to the province's Court of Appeal to replace Justice Jean Côté (Edmonton), who reaches retirement age on Aug. 14.

Alberta Provincial Court Judge Robin Camp has been appointed to the Federal Court to replace Justice Yves de Montigny, who has been elevated to the Federal Court of Appeal.

In Alberta, candidates for Provincial Court appointments are first screened by the Alberta Judicial Council and then interviewed by the Provincial Court Nominating Committee, which provides its recommendations to the minister of justice.

Star alumni: Prime Minister R.B. Bennett; Senator James Lougheed; Alberta Attorney General John Boyle; Alberta Chief Justice Bruce Smith; former Alberta Court of Appeal justice HowardJustice Bruce Smith; former Alberta Court of Appeal justice Howardjustice Howard Irving

Justices McDonald and O'Ferrall indicated that the Charter analysis undertaken by the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta was unnecessary, and upheld the decision on administrative law grounds.

Star alumni: Alberta Court of Appeal Justice Brian O'Ferrall; Alberta Court of Queen's Bench justices Brian Burrows, Donna Shelley, and Michelle Crighton; Alberta Provincial Court justices Michael Stevens - Guille and Frederick Day; Ledcor in - house counsel Rodney Neys; Cove Properties in - house counsel Clay Hamdon

In granting Knecht's application for leave to appeal, Alberta Court of Appeal Justice Jack Watson wrote: «[T] he chief has an arguable case regarding the questions.

Alberta Provincial Court (Civil Division)-- $ 25,000 Provincial Court of British Columbia — $ 25,000 Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, Small Claims Division — $ 10,000 Small Claims Court of New Brunswick — $ 6,000 Provincial Court of Newfoundland and Labrador, Small Claims Court — $ 5,000 Territorial Court of the Northwest Territories — $ 10,000 Nova Scotia Small Claims Court — $ 25,000 Nunavut Court of Justice — Unified court, no separate small claims structure Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Small Claims Court — $ 10,000, changing to $ 25,000 January 1, 2010 Prince Edward Island Supreme Court, Trial Division — $ 8,000 Court of Quebec, Civil Division — $ 7,000 Saskatchewan Provincial Court, Small Claims Division — $ 20,000 Yukon Small Claims Court — $ 2Court (Civil Division)-- $ 25,000 Provincial Court of British Columbia — $ 25,000 Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, Small Claims Division — $ 10,000 Small Claims Court of New Brunswick — $ 6,000 Provincial Court of Newfoundland and Labrador, Small Claims Court — $ 5,000 Territorial Court of the Northwest Territories — $ 10,000 Nova Scotia Small Claims Court — $ 25,000 Nunavut Court of Justice — Unified court, no separate small claims structure Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Small Claims Court — $ 10,000, changing to $ 25,000 January 1, 2010 Prince Edward Island Supreme Court, Trial Division — $ 8,000 Court of Quebec, Civil Division — $ 7,000 Saskatchewan Provincial Court, Small Claims Division — $ 20,000 Yukon Small Claims Court — $ 2Court of British Columbia — $ 25,000 Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, Small Claims Division — $ 10,000 Small Claims Court of New Brunswick — $ 6,000 Provincial Court of Newfoundland and Labrador, Small Claims Court — $ 5,000 Territorial Court of the Northwest Territories — $ 10,000 Nova Scotia Small Claims Court — $ 25,000 Nunavut Court of Justice — Unified court, no separate small claims structure Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Small Claims Court — $ 10,000, changing to $ 25,000 January 1, 2010 Prince Edward Island Supreme Court, Trial Division — $ 8,000 Court of Quebec, Civil Division — $ 7,000 Saskatchewan Provincial Court, Small Claims Division — $ 20,000 Yukon Small Claims Court — $ 2Court of Queen's Bench, Small Claims Division — $ 10,000 Small Claims Court of New Brunswick — $ 6,000 Provincial Court of Newfoundland and Labrador, Small Claims Court — $ 5,000 Territorial Court of the Northwest Territories — $ 10,000 Nova Scotia Small Claims Court — $ 25,000 Nunavut Court of Justice — Unified court, no separate small claims structure Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Small Claims Court — $ 10,000, changing to $ 25,000 January 1, 2010 Prince Edward Island Supreme Court, Trial Division — $ 8,000 Court of Quebec, Civil Division — $ 7,000 Saskatchewan Provincial Court, Small Claims Division — $ 20,000 Yukon Small Claims Court — $ 2Court of New Brunswick — $ 6,000 Provincial Court of Newfoundland and Labrador, Small Claims Court — $ 5,000 Territorial Court of the Northwest Territories — $ 10,000 Nova Scotia Small Claims Court — $ 25,000 Nunavut Court of Justice — Unified court, no separate small claims structure Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Small Claims Court — $ 10,000, changing to $ 25,000 January 1, 2010 Prince Edward Island Supreme Court, Trial Division — $ 8,000 Court of Quebec, Civil Division — $ 7,000 Saskatchewan Provincial Court, Small Claims Division — $ 20,000 Yukon Small Claims Court — $ 2Court of Newfoundland and Labrador, Small Claims Court — $ 5,000 Territorial Court of the Northwest Territories — $ 10,000 Nova Scotia Small Claims Court — $ 25,000 Nunavut Court of Justice — Unified court, no separate small claims structure Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Small Claims Court — $ 10,000, changing to $ 25,000 January 1, 2010 Prince Edward Island Supreme Court, Trial Division — $ 8,000 Court of Quebec, Civil Division — $ 7,000 Saskatchewan Provincial Court, Small Claims Division — $ 20,000 Yukon Small Claims Court — $ 2Court — $ 5,000 Territorial Court of the Northwest Territories — $ 10,000 Nova Scotia Small Claims Court — $ 25,000 Nunavut Court of Justice — Unified court, no separate small claims structure Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Small Claims Court — $ 10,000, changing to $ 25,000 January 1, 2010 Prince Edward Island Supreme Court, Trial Division — $ 8,000 Court of Quebec, Civil Division — $ 7,000 Saskatchewan Provincial Court, Small Claims Division — $ 20,000 Yukon Small Claims Court — $ 2Court of the Northwest Territories — $ 10,000 Nova Scotia Small Claims Court — $ 25,000 Nunavut Court of Justice — Unified court, no separate small claims structure Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Small Claims Court — $ 10,000, changing to $ 25,000 January 1, 2010 Prince Edward Island Supreme Court, Trial Division — $ 8,000 Court of Quebec, Civil Division — $ 7,000 Saskatchewan Provincial Court, Small Claims Division — $ 20,000 Yukon Small Claims Court — $ 2Court — $ 25,000 Nunavut Court of Justice — Unified court, no separate small claims structure Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Small Claims Court — $ 10,000, changing to $ 25,000 January 1, 2010 Prince Edward Island Supreme Court, Trial Division — $ 8,000 Court of Quebec, Civil Division — $ 7,000 Saskatchewan Provincial Court, Small Claims Division — $ 20,000 Yukon Small Claims Court — $ 2Court of Justice — Unified court, no separate small claims structure Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Small Claims Court — $ 10,000, changing to $ 25,000 January 1, 2010 Prince Edward Island Supreme Court, Trial Division — $ 8,000 Court of Quebec, Civil Division — $ 7,000 Saskatchewan Provincial Court, Small Claims Division — $ 20,000 Yukon Small Claims Court — $ 2court, no separate small claims structure Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Small Claims Court — $ 10,000, changing to $ 25,000 January 1, 2010 Prince Edward Island Supreme Court, Trial Division — $ 8,000 Court of Quebec, Civil Division — $ 7,000 Saskatchewan Provincial Court, Small Claims Division — $ 20,000 Yukon Small Claims Court — $ 2Court of Justice, Small Claims Court — $ 10,000, changing to $ 25,000 January 1, 2010 Prince Edward Island Supreme Court, Trial Division — $ 8,000 Court of Quebec, Civil Division — $ 7,000 Saskatchewan Provincial Court, Small Claims Division — $ 20,000 Yukon Small Claims Court — $ 2Court — $ 10,000, changing to $ 25,000 January 1, 2010 Prince Edward Island Supreme Court, Trial Division — $ 8,000 Court of Quebec, Civil Division — $ 7,000 Saskatchewan Provincial Court, Small Claims Division — $ 20,000 Yukon Small Claims Court — $ 2Court, Trial Division — $ 8,000 Court of Quebec, Civil Division — $ 7,000 Saskatchewan Provincial Court, Small Claims Division — $ 20,000 Yukon Small Claims Court — $ 2Court of Quebec, Civil Division — $ 7,000 Saskatchewan Provincial Court, Small Claims Division — $ 20,000 Yukon Small Claims Court — $ 2Court, Small Claims Division — $ 20,000 Yukon Small Claims Court — $ 2Court — $ 25,000

In Kazakewich v. Kazakewich, [1936] A.J. No. 10 (C.A.), the Alberta Court of Appeal summed up the ratios in Lambe, Severn and Edwards in this way at paragraph 86: I take it then that in approaching the interpretation of the pertinent sections of The B.N.A. Act with respect to the administration of justice, a Court should keep in mind that these sections are embodied in an Imperial statute to which the ordinary rules for the interpretation of statutes apply, that therefore the intention of the framers of this Imperial statute must be ascertained as at the date of the enactment by having regard to the words employed without extraneous aids to interpretation where the language is unambiguous, and that having regard however to the nature of the statute, a great constitutional charter, the widest and most liberal construction of the words used should be adopted with a view to giving effect to the whole scheme of Canadian union [Emphasis Added].

Justice S.J. Greckol of the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta concluded, at paras. 38 - 41, that the prosecution did not establish that defence counsel had knowledge of, ``... the very thing that is at the heart of the new disclosure such that he ought to have requested it.»

Woolley takes the role alongside Allen Sulatycky, a former associate chief justice of the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta, who has been appointed as the city's independent integrity commissioner.

Alberta is moving to change the way some matters are dealt with in the court system in an attempt to improve access to justice.

4 (3)(k) personal information contained in a court file, a record of a judge of the Court of Appeal of Alberta, the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta or The Provincial Court of Alberta, a record of a master in chambers of the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta, a record of a sitting justice of the peace or a presiding justice of the peace under the Justice of the Peace Act, a judicial administration record or a record relating to support services provided to the judges of any of the courts referred to in this clcourt file, a record of a judge of the Court of Appeal of Alberta, the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta or The Provincial Court of Alberta, a record of a master in chambers of the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta, a record of a sitting justice of the peace or a presiding justice of the peace under the Justice of the Peace Act, a judicial administration record or a record relating to support services provided to the judges of any of the courts referred to in this clCourt of Appeal of Alberta, the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta or The Provincial Court of Alberta, a record of a master in chambers of the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta, a record of a sitting justice of the peace or a presiding justice of the peace under the Justice of the Peace Act, a judicial administration record or a record relating to support services provided to the judges of any of the courts referred to in this clCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta or The Provincial Court of Alberta, a record of a master in chambers of the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta, a record of a sitting justice of the peace or a presiding justice of the peace under the Justice of the Peace Act, a judicial administration record or a record relating to support services provided to the judges of any of the courts referred to in this clCourt of Alberta, a record of a master in chambers of the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta, a record of a sitting justice of the peace or a presiding justice of the peace under the Justice of the Peace Act, a judicial administration record or a record relating to support services provided to the judges of any of the courts referred to in this clCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta, a record of a sitting justice of the peace or a presiding justice of the peace under the Justice of the Peace Act, a judicial administration record or a record relating to support services provided to the judges of any of the courts referred to in this justice of the peace or a presiding justice of the peace under the Justice of the Peace Act, a judicial administration record or a record relating to support services provided to the judges of any of the courts referred to in this justice of the peace under the Justice of the Peace Act, a judicial administration record or a record relating to support services provided to the judges of any of the courts referred to in this Justice of the Peace Act, a judicial administration record or a record relating to support services provided to the judges of any of the courts referred to in this clause.

Justices McDonald and O'Ferrall indicated that the Charter analysis undertaken by the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta was unnecessary, and upheld the... [more]

But this is too little to prevent acute delays in the Alberta justice system and does nothing to help Ontario's clogged courts, according to sources.

«Due to the ongoing shortage of judicial resources at the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta, the Court has been put in a position where it must curtail some of its services,» said Chief Justice Neil Wittman and Associate Chief Justice John Rooke in last week's announcement.

As for the rest of the Supreme Court justices, Abella, Michael Moldaver and Andromache Karakatsanis come from Ontario and Russell Brown is from Alberta.

Federal Court Justice Robin Camp — who made controversial remarks during a 2014 trial at the Provincial Court of Alberta — has been at the centre of an inquiry by the council, and is battling to keep his job.

In R v Croft, 2014 ABQB 215, a case on which I was counsel, Justice Brian R. Burrows of the Court of Queen's Bench in Edmonton, Alberta, extended the Telus ruling to encompass historic text messages that were seized by a production order under s. 487.012.

The Alberta Court of Appeal (Justices Côté, Watson and Slatter, writing as «The Court») dismissed Ms. Ernst's appeal.

In the Alberta Court of Appeal ruling reported as R v Wagar, 2015 ABCA 327 Justice Brian K. O'Ferrall, speaking for a unanimous court, made short shrift of Justice Camp's judgment, at p. 1: ``... [W] e are satisfied that the trial judge's comments throughout the proceedings and in his reasons gave rise to doubts about the trial judge's understanding of the law governing sexual assaults and in particular, the meaning of consent and restrictions on evidence of the complainant's sexual activity... We are also persuaded that sexual stereotypes and stereotypical myths, which have long since been discredited, may have found their way into the trial judge's judgment.&rCourt of Appeal ruling reported as R v Wagar, 2015 ABCA 327 Justice Brian K. O'Ferrall, speaking for a unanimous court, made short shrift of Justice Camp's judgment, at p. 1: ``... [W] e are satisfied that the trial judge's comments throughout the proceedings and in his reasons gave rise to doubts about the trial judge's understanding of the law governing sexual assaults and in particular, the meaning of consent and restrictions on evidence of the complainant's sexual activity... We are also persuaded that sexual stereotypes and stereotypical myths, which have long since been discredited, may have found their way into the trial judge's judgment.&rcourt, made short shrift of Justice Camp's judgment, at p. 1: ``... [W] e are satisfied that the trial judge's comments throughout the proceedings and in his reasons gave rise to doubts about the trial judge's understanding of the law governing sexual assaults and in particular, the meaning of consent and restrictions on evidence of the complainant's sexual activity... We are also persuaded that sexual stereotypes and stereotypical myths, which have long since been discredited, may have found their way into the trial judge's judgment.»

On April 12, 2016, the Alberta Court of Appeal released its split 2 - 1 ruling reported as R v Sargent, 2016 ABCA 104 where the majority, Justice J.D. Bruce McDonald and Justice Thomas W. Wakeling, increased the sentence to one year imprisonment.

Authors: Karen Hewitt, The Honourable Associate Chief Justice John D. Rooke, Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta, Jane Fagnan

Perhaps Chief Justice Wittmann and the Court of Appeal wanted to make clearer to counsel the framework within which the action against Alberta Environment will be assessed and give some sense of their predisposition to such actions.

The Court of Appeal noted that there was no appeal on the question of notice (at para 9), but the Minister of Justice and Solicitor General of Alberta intervened to reiterate the point that since Ernst had not filed notice of a constitutional challenge to section 43 of the ERCA, that issue should not be considered.

Fady graduated from the University of Alberta Faculty of Law in 2015 and thereafter clerked at the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta, where he worked closely with the Justices of the Court.

The Alberta Court of Appeal ruled that Justice Camp's decision could not stand because it may have been based on long - discredited sexual stereotypes and myths about survivors of sexual assault.

On September 11, 2015, she pleaded guilty to two counts of possession of a controlled substance for the purpose of trafficking and was sentenced by Justice V.O. Ouellette in the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta to concurrent terms of 90 days imprisonment to be served intermittently.

On July 21, 2016, Justice J.E. Topolniski of the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta, at Edmonton, released her ruling in R v JR, 2016 ABQB 414 overturning the acquittal of a young person for sexual assault.

Last week, Madam Justice Slawinsky of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench issued her decision in Café Can Cun Co Incorporated v. Halcor Development Corporation («Café Can Cun»).

However, despite recommendations for unified family courts made in 1968, 1972, 1976 and 1978, little progress was made toward their implementation in Alberta until 1999 when the government decided to solicit public input on a range of justice issues.