Sentences with phrase «alberta cases»

It is therefore of interest to see the Supreme Court of Canada hearing two Alberta cases, on the provocation defence found in section 232 of the Criminal Code, this April 26, 2013.
In Ernst the Court of Appeal does not cite any of these Alberta cases, but rather points to the 2011 Supreme Court of Canada decision in R v Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, 2011 SCC 42, where at paras 17 to 26 the Supreme Court sets out the test to be met for a motion to strike claims for the failure to disclose a reasonable cause of action.
Justice Manderscheid canvasses Dunsmuir and earlier Alberta cases concerning the standard of review applicable to FOIP decisions, and based on this jurisprudence he rules the standard of review applicable to the Commissioner's decisions is the deferential reasonableness standard (at paras 26 — 40).
As this Alberta case illustrates though, you are not required to incur substantial expenses in your efforts to identify that driver.
In this recent Alberta case, upheld on appeal, the plaintiff was videoed in both of these situations and, based this evidence; the judge found that the plaintiff was untruthful.
This is illustrated by this 2008 Alberta case, Wozniak (Next Friend of) v. Alexander, (upheld on appeal).
In a recent Alberta case, Condominium Plan No. 762 1302 v. Stebbing, the condominium corporation was unsuccessful in its attempt to have a cat removed from the property.
This 2007 Alberta case, Labrecque v. Heimbeckner, illustrates what type of care and assistance may be compensable.
In this recent Alberta case, the plaintiff claimed significant damages for chronic pain suffered after a car accident, but the defence produced a surveillance video which filmed her moving into a new home.
The 2016 Alberta case of Jones v. Stephanenko, 2016 ABQB 295, illustrates hallmarks of a credible plaintiff.
But if the party Dr. Foda was seeking to add in the Alberta case — a Donna Canart, Surgical Clinic Coordinator at Leduc Community Hospital — is the same person identified in the California proceedings, this evidence may now be available.
ABlawg.ca No Discrimination Against Long - Term Care Residents in Elder Advocates of Alberta Case
Earlier this week, the Supreme Court of Canada heard argument in an Alberta case involving the interplay between federal and provincial legislation providing for the compensation of workers injured in workplace activities.
The necessaries of life were not provided by the parents in the Alberta case.
Did either of the decisions give any weight to the use of a * personal * medium of expression by the student being disciplined, in the Alberta case Facebook — a non-campus, non-professional, highly personal forum of comment, and in the Windsor case Twitter, again personal not professional though more often used to build professional relationships (but maybe not by students)?
Canart allegedly filed a report against Dr. Foda according to the Capital Health Corporate Workplace Respect Policy, raising issues in the Alberta case of malicious prosecution.
I previously covered the Alberta case of Pridgen v. University of Calgary, where the court quashed a decision by the university to discipline students who made critical comments on Facebook about a professor.
The law of privilege is well reviewed in the Alberta case of Leonardis v. Leonardis, 2003 CarswellAlta 940.
In this 2004 Alberta case, two friends decided to go pick up another snowmobile at a neighbour's property just before they watched the Grey Cup football game.
This exact issue was raised in a 1998 Alberta case, and, the short answer is no.
The Alberta case focuses on a «risk - based» approach in drug testing cases (rather than the «balancing approach» used in Irving) in which the focus is on the dangerous nature of the workplace and whether testing is rationally connected to a need to eliminate safety risks in a hazardous work environment.
In a recent Alberta case, DH v TH, 2018 ABQB 147 (CanLII), Justice Lee faced a situation where a woman had obtained an ex parte protection order against her husband in British Columbia under the Family Law Act, SBC 2011, c 25.
I was browsing Alberta case law posted to CanLII today using their funky RSS feeds and an interesting tidbit caught my eye.
In an Alberta case, it was ruled that former employees were entitled to compete with former employers subject to a duty of confidentiality and any contractual duty.
In an Alberta case, the purchaser agreed to buy some land, intending to construct industrial condominiums.

Not exact matches

Later, on the sidelines of Suncor's annual general meeting, Williams said he hopes that «good sense and reason prevail» but added Suncor has a contingency plan in case Alberta follows through with its plan to restrict oil or refined fuel exports through the existing Trans Mountain pipeline to B.C.
In many cases, acceleration should lower their costs, as nominal interest rates will likely be higher two years from now than they are today, and idle construction crews in Alberta are relatively abundant.
Credit unions have long been moving away from the hyper - local, one or two - branch model and consolidating, in some cases expanding province - wide, as Alberta's Servus did in 2008.
Reasons have since been offered for the high - profile provincial misses — in the case of Alberta, a last - minute swing in voting intentions from Wildrose to the PCs; in B.C., the failure of those who said they'd vote NDP to show up on election day.
The group said records for 2012 - 2013 show 224 cases where businesses in Alberta paid foreign workers less than the prevailing wage rate.
The Liberals are unlikely to make any final decision on drug testing until the Supreme Court of Canada rules on its legality in a case between Suncor and workers at its Alberta oil sands operation, said Troy Winters, senior health and safety officer with the Canadian Union of Public Employees.
That's no longer the case, or less so, in Alberta.
Today, a truck carrying more than 2,880 cases of water canned to disaster specifications departed from the brewer's Alberta distribution centres.
(The baseline applies to all facilities in Alberta, not just the oil and gas industry, as would be the case with federal regulation.)
When prices go up it opens the door to new sources of supply that were previously too expensive to extract (Alberta's oil sands are a case in point).
Alberta Premier Rachel Notley, centre, and Finance Miniser Joe Ceci, right, speak to steel workers as she tours a company producing pipe, casing and tubing for the Canadian oil and gas sector in Calgary THE CANADIAN PRESS / Jeff McIntosh
B.C. Environment Minister George Heyman announced Wednesday that his government would file a reference case with the B.C. Court of Appeal by the end of the month to test whether the province has the constitutional authority to limit imports of diluted bitumen from Alberta.
And even if Canadian courts ultimately deem such probing too onerous within the rubric of «reasonableness» review, such details can provide fodder for public commentary that can undermine the government's position in the court of public opinion (regarding the economic case for increased oil sands production, for example, see University of Alberta Professor Andrew Leach's commentary here).
The commercial case for the Keystone XL project, which would allow Gulf Coast refiners to access oil from lower - priced, landlocked markets such as Alberta, therefore, would potentially allow the U.S. to reduce their dependence on foreign oil — albeit by a small amount.
I think you can make a compelling case that an emissions reduction sourced through CCS is worth more to Alberta than an emissions reduction from an existing, proven technology.
By: Shaun Fluker PDF Version: Alberta Suspends Habitat Protection Plans for Endangered Woodland Caribou Case Commented On: Minister of Environment and Parks March 19, 2018 Letter re: Alberta Draft Woodland Caribou Range Plan On March 19 the Minister of Environment and Parks... Continue reading →
Deployment of CCS will drive learning, and the lowered future abatement costs from deploying a new technology will benefit Alberta, and so it makes sense in this case for the government to bear some of the costs of this risky investment.
This clearly doesn't apply in the case of the TransMountain pipeline, but Alberta's Bill 12 might give the federal government a reason to use it.
The crux of Cohodes» case against the mortgage provider lies in its exposure to Alberta, the oil - producing heartland of Canada, which is still reeling from the downturn in crude prices.
Case in point: the Alberta floods in Q2 2013.
There's a strong business case for Trans Mountain to get built, and it would be an economic boon not just to Alberta but the country as a whole.
Less extreme cases took place across central and southern Alberta, where Wildrose candidates were elected in long - time Tory voting constituencies.
«Previous governments in Alberta and Ottawa offered to provide a subsidy of $ 779 milliontoward the $ 1.4 - billion price tag for TransAlta's proposed coal - fired carbon capture and storage project, but even with taxpayers shouldering more than half the cost, there wasn't a viable business case and the project was shelved.
The latter would seem to be the case with the once close and interconnected branches of the New Democratic Party in Alberta...
Alberta voters swept out cash - flush Progressive Conservative candidates in favour of the cash - strapped New Democrats in 2015, but it has generally been the case in Alberta elections that the richest campaigns win on election day.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z