Although academies and free schools can not be run for profit, many are run by private, non-profit making organisations - some of which run «chains» of several schools.
Not exact matches
Your friend Tristram Hunt of course is guilty of the same Neo-Liberal agenda, he supported
free schools right up to the point where they started to fail in Sweden, then rapidly reversed to just supporting the
Academies which the teaching profession reject
and only work with it from imposition, even that now has turned into mass protest forcing the numskull Tories to publicly retreat,
although they will secretly use the inspectors to rig the system, where good
schools are deemed poor by their diktat.
Although there are still many
schools, most commonly called community schools, controlled and receiving funding through the local council, the number of new Free Schools and Academies continues t
schools, most commonly called community
schools, controlled and receiving funding through the local council, the number of new Free Schools and Academies continues t
schools, controlled
and receiving funding through the local council, the number of new
Free Schools and Academies continues t
Schools and Academies continues to grow.
It means local authorities do not have as much control over the creation of new
schools and places as they once did,
although they can invite bids for
free schools and academies in their areas.
Exempt charities, including
academies,
free schools and voluntary - aided
schools, can not register with the Charity Commission
and are regulated by the DfE,
although the former can sometimes play a regulatory role.
(Figures from the
School Workforce Census published in November 2016) I had always assumed that it was only
academies and free schools that employed unqualified teachers,
and although they do employ proportionally more than LA
schools the fact that LAs employ 11,700 unqualified teachers in primary, secondary
and special / PRY
schools isn't usually referred to...