The paragraph is perhaps not the
full story — possibly due to space constraints in the article — and it may be better expressed in one of their presentations,
although I could not lay my hands on a better
explanation quickly.
That might or might not be problematic in an of itself (
although I would say usually it is), but when he launches such criticisms of individuals, without a
full explanation of context, and with indirectness and inuendo, and without specifying who he is referring to so we can distinguish his inuendo from political conspiracies — he does himself a disservice (IMO) and makes it impossible for someone like myself to evaluate his position.