Not exact matches
Only
speak when you have something important
to say — and
always define important as what matters
to the other
person, not
to you.
While it may not
always work, at the very least you'll look
to your co-workers as though you're
speaking calmly and the other
person is being irrational.
«Bands
always,
always hire by values first and once the
person looks right, feels right,
speaks the same language, then he's allowed
to get up and jam with the band,» he says.
Before reporting an incident of sexual harassment
to a higher authority, Gillian Thomas, who is a senior staff attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union Women's Rights Project, says it's
always best
to speak with the
person affected by the incident first.
«Only one
person can
speak at a time and the video and audio
always seem
to have problems.
Always speak peer
to peer rather than coming across as knowing more than the other
person.
«It was
always a place where
people were frightened
to speak out.»
It
always fascinates me the way art
speaks to different
people in so many different ways.
I'm not saying Christians should
always evangelize, we should ALWAYS love, BUT, with this woman, she is speaking to people on their dea
always evangelize, we should
ALWAYS love, BUT, with this woman, she is speaking to people on their dea
ALWAYS love, BUT, with this woman, she is
speaking to people on their deathbed.
But the ideal first -
person narrator
always speaks in some sense from beyond the grave of his own character, and Mailer's resurrected Jesus» relating «The Events Leading Up
to My Execution»» may be the purest possible literary solution.
Why do
people who know NOTHING about the Bible
always feel compelled
to speak about it?
Oh ok that makes sense and that's a hard one
to know if it was God or his own voice, there are many times God
speaks to people and tells them
to do things that we may not
always like or approve.
Any time I get up
to speak, he
always comes through, and if you trust God he can even cause you
to have favour and for
people to like you, even when there is no reason for them
to.
What we meant
to model was the sending of one of our number
to be a foreign missionary —
to learn a new language,
to understand a local culture,
to sacrifice the amenities of affluence and
to live knowing that he or she is
always being watched by seekers — while the rest of us stay here as lifetime local missionaries, learning
to speak the language of the unchurched, understanding secular culture, sacrificing the amenities of affluence and living as a «watched»
person in a society that is skeptical of Christian spirituality until it sees the real thing on display.
[2]
To always use the word «
person» emphasises that we are
speaking about someone, who possesses an inviolable dignity.
Mark's series of parables ends with the parable of the mustard seed and the statement that Jesus
always used parables in
speaking to the
people.
He was the only explanation for how the world came
to be, how
people managed
to be good
to one another, how believers had religious experiences, how things
always worked together for good, how the Bible
spoke to me, how the day after I prayed for this or that I just happened
to received this or that.
Religious
people speak of God when human knowledge (perhaps simply because they are too lazy
to think) come
to an end, or when human resources fall — in fact it is
always the deus ex machina that they bring on
to the scene, either for the apparent solution of insoluble problems, or as strength in human failure —
always, that is
to say, exploiting human weakness or human boundaries.11
You say you
always treat
people like you like
to be I guess you love being hated for your sexuality You love when
people put words in your mouth «Bout what you believe, make you sound like a freak «Cause if you really believe what you say you believe You wouldn't be so damn reckless with the words you
speak Wouldn't silently conceal when the liars
speak Denyin» all the dyin» of the remedy Tell me, brother, what matters more
to you?
It is necessary, if one is
to be clear,
always to speak of value for a specified
person.
But I found myself now in a place were I found the Jesus that I
always preached
to other
people for about 15 years including 8 1/2 years in as a missionary in a Third World Country with my wife and three children (two of them born overseas), the Jesus that
speaks to you, the Jesus that wants
to make you happy and give you hope, the Jesus that saved me and I knew but not
to this level of intimacy.
God is
always active, is
always speaking, is
always involved, is
always answering prayer, and is
always working
to accomplish His will in the world... even when He is not having
people write about it.
It has
always seemed
to me that when
people speak out
to say that something is incoherent or vague or whatever, it also demonstrates their unwillingness
to engage in something that they haven't already been able
to define, pin - down, label, etc., etc..
To put it in the way in which others have spoken, both eucharistic celebration and proclamation of the gospel should always be in a fashion that is appropriate to the witness of the Christian past and at the same time available for the thinking and feeling of the people who take par
To put it in the way in which others have
spoken, both eucharistic celebration and proclamation of the gospel should
always be in a fashion that is appropriate
to the witness of the Christian past and at the same time available for the thinking and feeling of the people who take par
to the witness of the Christian past and at the same time available for the thinking and feeling of the
people who take part.
Canon Harper also told the newspaper some of her parishioners support her view: «I thought
people would be furious with me for
speaking in support of assisted dying, but I've had many
people coming up
to me
to shake my hand and say «It's what I've
always thought».
With this in mind, preachers of the «good news» needs
always to remember that in their proclamation of that which in Christ God has «determined, dared, and done» (in Christopher Smart's compelling words) they are
speaking not just for the contemporary Church but for the whole body of faithful
people.
There have
always been lots of
people who knew that the institutional Christianity was not the only way of following Jesus, but those who were in positions of power never gave these
people a platform or a pulpit from which
to speak.
Sure, when Jesus is feeding the multitudes, or
speaking to the crowds, there are
always women among the throngs of
people, but when Jesus is
speaking just
to his inner disciples, or when Jesus and his disciples are crossing the Sea of Galilee, all you ever see are men.
«Any form of bullying and harassment of others is
always wrong, including making fun of others,
speaking down
to them and saying things that hurt
people,» the site says.
Just as the ministry of all Christians was rediscovered as an important New Testament motif at the time of the Protestant Reformation, the Bible can
always speak some new, liberating word
to the need of the
people of God.
For instance, when Yeshua is
speaking to the
people and says, «You have heard it said..., but I say unto you...,» I had
always been told that he was, «quoting the Law and then saying that it doesn't apply anymore.»
Sister Mary Corita chose
to answer these questions with the words of William Sloane Coffin: «Because we love the world, we pray now, O [God], for grace
to quarrel with it, O Thou whose lover's quarrel with the world is the history of the world... Lord, grant us grace
to quarrel with the worship of success and power...
to quarrel with all that profanes and trivializes [
people] and separates them... number us, we beseech Thee, in the ranks of those who went forth from this place longing only for those things for which Thou dost make us long, [those] for whom the complexity of the issues only served
to renew their zeal
to deal with them, [those] who alleviated pain by sharing it; and [those] who were
always willing
to risk something big for something good... O God, take our minds and think through them, take our lips and
speak through them.
««The» anti-Semite, he seems
to imply all through the book, is
always the same kind of a
person, recognizable at a glance, and, so
to speak, in action the whole time.
But, «it is the young
people who are
always the first
to speak to him, and feel most relaxed around Adam,» says Mr. Wright.
One must «
speak of liberty, as the youth of today has placed it in his culture, but liberty must
always be in relation
to truth, as it is truth that produces liberty... [and] one can not
speak of God
to young
people without knowing the culture of today's young
people, which is scientific.
People like you
always try
to take up all the room wherever they go (so
to speak).
Thus the preacher
always must bear in mind that he or she is not simply «expounding the Bible»; he or she is also working with the development of Christian faith down the centuries and with the fashion in which that faith
speaks directly
to people in our own time.
«Again, the corrupt and unsound form of
speaking in the plural number
to a single
person, you
to one, instead of thou, contrary
to the pure, plain, and single language of truth, thou
to one, and you
to more than one, which had
always been used by God
to men, and men
to God, as well as one
to another, from the oldest record of time till corrupt men, for corrupt ends, in later and corrupt times,
to flatter, fawn, and work upon the corrupt nature in men, brought in that false and senseless way of
speaking you
to one, which has since corrupted the modern languages, and hath greatly debased the spirits and depraved the manners of men; — this evil custom I had been as forward in as others, and this I was now called out of and required
to cease from.
(
people don't follow insane dudes) If when he
spoke it was
always inconsistant then
people who not want
to hear
to next part being already confused.
These interests, or,
to speak more concretely, the
people who have these interests, are
always «located» culturally, socially, economically, and politically.
Speaking as a journalist, I know» very sadly» that what tends
to make
people sit up and take notice is violence; and while Christians may not
always turn the other cheek, they do tend
to take it all lying down, and get on with it as best they can, and that doesn't necessarily make for front - page headlines.»
When God reveals himself, he
always does so
to people, which means that he must
speak and act in ways that they will understand... It is essential
to the very nature of revelation that the Bible is not unique
to its environment.
l) «What, in short, is the «mechanism» by which God makes himself known
to man, by which the Almighty touches the mightless, by which the Limitless penetrates the narrow confines of the limited, by which Time enters moment, by which the Holy invades the unholy, and the Word
speaks in words» Even when this happens, as ultimately it did, as with finality it
always does, in the
person of Jesus Christ, all the forms and ingenuity of human language are inadequate
to give it mechanical explanation.
Although I met Sidney Hook in
person only once or twice, I
always felt a sympathetic bond between us on this issue, and I had a chance
to speak with him about it not long before he died.
In the church he
spoke in German, and enjoyed the Saxon idiom, often quoting from an Aesop fable, or from some well - known saying;
always there was the quality of
speaking to people's own needs, seeing into their deepest felt concerns.
And his efforts
to explore these issues always began with and never strayed far from the way religious people actually talk (cf. my forthcoming book Ian Ramsey: To Speak Responsibly of God
to explore these issues
always began with and never strayed far from the way religious
people actually talk (cf. my forthcoming book Ian Ramsey:
To Speak Responsibly of God
To Speak Responsibly of God).
Even in this more secular age,
people in the western world tacitly, even if unintentionally, acknowledge Christian faith when they refer
to a particular year by number, since the words Anno Domini, strictly
speaking, are
always implied.
Christine, that is a really powerful way
to convey that relationship, and one that portrays my relationship not
to the bible, but more
to the «feeling / knowing / hearing» god... Even at my most believing, I never had the experience of God talking directly
to me and telling me what
to do, but so many
people I knew seemed
to have this... I
always had my doubts and confusions; the times where I truly felt god or heard god, it was at a deep sensing level... not anyting
spoken or any kind of instruction.
If, like me, you are already part of the
speaking circuit,
always have a few recommendations in mind
to leave with the
person who brought you in
to speak.
Unlike word, which can be written as well as
spoken, or deed, which is
always separate and distinct from the
person who performs it, or even light, which can be distinguished from the object which generates it, life is inseparable from the organism which it animates and
to which it gives movement and responsiveness
to the environment.