In the United States, a public defender is a right guaranteed by the 6th
Amendment in criminal prosecutions.
Not exact matches
There is considerable doubt that the Sixth
Amendment itself, as originally drafted by the Framers of the Bill of Rights, contemplated any guarantee other than the right of an accused
in a
criminal prosecution in a federal court to employ a lawyer to assist
in his defense.
Although its analysis, like that
in Gideon and other earlier cases, suggested that the Sixth
Amendment right to counsel should apply to all state
criminal prosecutions, Argersinger held only that an indigent defendant is entitled to appointed counsel, even
in petty offenses punishable by six months of incarceration or less, if he is likely to be sentenced to incarceration for any time if convicted.
The court still reversed the contempt finding, holding that Markowitz had a Fifth
Amendment right not to identify the clients because doing so might expose him to
criminal prosecution, but that element doesn't seem to exist
in the Cohen situation.
The First
Amendment prohibits
criminal prosecution of a U.S. Army paratrooper for racist statements he made online, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces has ruled
in a July 15 decision, United States v. Wilcox.
This applies directly
in the case of federal
criminal prosecutions in the federal courts, and applies
in state courts because it is incorporated to apply
in state court cases through the due process clause of the Fourteenth
Amendment to the Constitution of the United States under 20th century case law applying the «Selective Incorporation doctrine.»
«The Sixth
Amendment's Confrontation Clause provides that
in all
criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to be confronted with the witnesses against him.
The Sixth
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads: «
In all
criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial....»
The Sixth
Amendment to the United States Constitution provides
in pertinent part: «In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right... to have the assistance of counsel for his defence.&raqu
in pertinent part: «
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right... to have the assistance of counsel for his defence.&raqu
In all
criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right... to have the assistance of counsel for his defence.»
The Sixth
Amendment provides, «
In all
criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right... to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.»
It is both critical for
criminal suspects to assert their right to remain silent under the Constitution's Fifth
Amendment, to have a federal
criminal lawyer advocating for them early on to work to avoid a
prosecution in the first place, and to minimize being behind the eight - ball
in defending against federal felony charges.
Under the 6th
Amendment we have very specific rights «
In all
criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by...
The Reason: The Sixth
Amendment states that «
in all
criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right... to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.»
As detailed
in this new Reason piece, headlined «Ross Ulbricht Files Appeal to the Supreme Court on His Life Sentence Without Parole: Silk Road founder's appeal stresses the dangerous Fourth and Sixth
Amendment implications of his
prosecution and sentencing,» a notable federal
criminal defendant is bringing some notable issues to the Supreme Court via a new cert petition.
Through its lawsuit, Twitter claims it has a First
Amendment right to use warrant canaries to say whether or not it has received various categories of so - called NSL letters and FISA requests — secret orders that can subject the companies to
criminal prosecution if they even disclose the existence of the letters
in the first place.