A more amusing account of the differences, written from a perspective more sympathetic to Russell, highlights the sense in which mainstream Anglo -
American analytic thought has tended to ignore or downplay Whitehead.
Not exact matches
In The Heart of the Matter, a 2013 report sponsored by the
American Academy of Arts and Sciences, a reader is confronted with language like this: «Among other benefits [studying the humanities] strengthens clarity of written and oral expression, critical and
analytic reasoning, and the creativity to
think outside the box.»
I
think it would be beneficial both to Whitehead studies and to relevant portions of
analytic philosophy to bring Whitehead more back into the
American philosophical mainstream by considering his specific problems and solutions in light of current interests and as susceptible to criticisms from current perspectives.