In 1980,
American nuclear power plants were generating electricity only 56 percent of the time because they frequently needed special maintenance or repair.
NO American nuclear power plant has Ever exceeded the local natural background radiation.
Not exact matches
The Trump administration accused Russia of engineering a series of cyberattacks that targeted
American and European
nuclear power plants and water and electric systems, and could have sabotaged or shut
power plants off at will.
After all, no one has ever died in a commercial
nuclear power accident on
American soil; in contrast, emissions from fossil - fuel
plants kill 24,000
Americans each year, according to a 2004 report commissioned by the Clean Air Task Force, an environmental group.
An international research team reports results of a three - year study of sediment samples collected offshore from the Fukushima Daiichi
Nuclear Power Plant in a new paper published August 18, 2015, in the
American Chemical Society's journal, Environmental Science and Technology.
Radiation from Japan's leaking Fukushima
nuclear power plant has reached waters offshore Canada, researchers said today at the annual
American Geophysical Union's Ocean Sciences Meeting in Honolulu.
About half of
Americans (51 %) oppose building more
nuclear power plants, while 45 % are in favor.
American nuclear power reactors operated that year around the clock at about 90 percent capacity, whereas coal - fired
plants operated at about 73 percent, hydroelectric
plants at 29 percent, natural gas from 16 to 38 percent, wind at 27 percent, solar at 19 percent, and geothermal at 75 percent.»
In December, however, the North
American Electric Reliability Corp. (NERC) suggested in its 2017 Long - Term Reliability Assessment that
power generation from natural gas — fired units and renewable sources such as solar and wind will provide enough electricity to offset closures of coal and
nuclear plants over the next decade, at least.
UCS is helping make
nuclear power in the United States safer, reducing risks for the millions of
Americans who live near
nuclear power plants.
Global Wind Energy Council, Global Wind 2008 Report (Brussels: 2009), pp. 3, 56; Erik Shuster, Tracking New Coal - Fired
Power Plants (Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Energy Technology Laboratory, January 2009); «
Nuclear Dips in 2008,» World
Nuclear News, 29 May 2009; 1 megawatt of installed wind capacity produces enough electricity to supply 300 homes from
American Wind Energy Association, «U.S. Wind Energy Installations Reach New Milestone,» press release (Washington, DC: 14 August 2006); number of homes calculated using average U.S. household size from U.S. Census Bureau, «2005 — 2007
American Community Survey 3 - Year Estimates — Data Profile Highlights,» at factfinder.census.gov / servlet / ACSSAFFFacts, viewed 9 April 2009, and population from U.S. Census Bureau, State & Country QuickFacts, electronic database, at quickfacts.census.gov, updated 20 February 2009.
I want
Americans to think whether they really want to risk the dangers of
nuclear power plants.
If
plants continue to shut down instead of extending operations the nation risks losing 60 percent of its clean electricity starting in 2030, according to a new report, Renewing Licenses for the Nation's
Nuclear Power Plant by the
American Physical Society.
Although Latin
American countries rely lightly on
nuclear power (only Argentina, Brazil and Mexico have
plants, which represent only 2 % of the region's energy production), many countries had plans for new
plants until this week: namely Chile, Ecuador and Venezuela, apart from expansion plans in the countries that already have centrals.
It is a fantasy designed to get the support of Senator Graham and other fuzzy - minded Senators with visions of lots of new
nuclear plants, billions for technology to capture and store carbon dioxide emissions from coal - fired
power plants, less dependence on imported oil, and tariffs to protect
American manufacturing jobs in energy - intensive industries.