Right up to its closure in 1957, the college remained imbued with the ideas of European modernism, the philosophy of
American pragmatism and teaching methods that aimed to encourage personal initiative as well as the social competence of the individual.
Part intellectual history, part memoir, American Philosophy is an invigorating investigation of
American pragmatism and the wisdom that underlies a meaningful life.
In some respects this resembles the idealism of George Berkeley or Immanuel Kant, with a touch of
American pragmatism.
Kaplan's conviction that thinking is sociological, he told me, is derived from
American pragmatism.
Even when Europeans have recognized
this American pragmatism, they have failed to appreciate it (and thereby exposed their own intellectual provincialism).
As opposed to Novitas Mundi, now
American pragmatism is the true prelude to the thinking now occurring for the first time, and most immediately so the uniquely American theology of the death of God, a theology which while voiding pragmatism is the last gasp of modernity, and it in these death throes that a final apocalyptic thinking is born.
But very early in the book the pattern which would continue to govern Wieman's appropriation of Whitehead's views is evident: Whitehead's philosophy, particularly his views published prior to Process and Reality, is transformed into
American pragmatism.
Pfuetze, Paul E., «Buber and
American Pragmatism,» The Philosophy of Martin Buber, ed.
Both Bergson and Alexander influenced Alfred North Whitehead, whose scientific and philosophical genius created the major work in process thought, Process and Reality.39 There are close affinities between the process philosophers and
American pragmatism.
Not exact matches
In that progressive circle of his childhood — the circle of the La Follette family and the reformist bureaucrats and academics of Madison, Wisconsin — «
American patriotism, redistributionist economics, anticommunism, and Deweyan
pragmatism went together easily and naturally.
Where America was once pragmatic — and gloriously so, in that the «can - do» mentality of
Americans was part of what made the country great — that
pragmatism has become tied to psychological needs.
To the extent that we
Americans can be said to have a philosophy, it is
pragmatism, which is less a philosophy than a trick the devil uses to entice philosophy into killing itself.
It's simple enough, and although the
American Rorty and the Italian Vattimo have been formed by different philosophical and religious traditions (
pragmatism and red - diaper communism for Rorty, hermeneutics and cradle Catholicism for Vattimo), they agree on most of its elements.
Among those who accepted the naturalism and
pragmatism dominant in
American thought in the second...
What followed Cane Ridge was the Christianization and Americanization of
American religion through revivalism, enthusiasm,
pragmatism and the notion of «the little me within the big me» that leads to solitude and notions of «soul competency.»
The
pragmatism of James and the instrumentalism of Dewey may have turned the
American mind away from philosophy, but Royce's theory would have called them to substitute abstract metaphysics for a living faith in revealed truth.
Another is that Tocqueville really does understand ourselves better than we understand ourselves, showing us that our
pragmatism and progressivism aren't really so much alien intrusions but indigenous expressions of the
American, democratic mind.
There is a peculiarly
American tradition based on
pragmatism and pluralism exemplified at its best in William James.
This is due, I believe, to the postmodern climate of thought, particularly evident in neopragmatic philosophy and deconstructionist literary criticism, and characterized by a new
pragmatism, pluralism, meliorism, relativism, and historicism — all congenial to the empirical theology that grew out of earlier
American versions of these same modes of thought.
One way of acknowledging its revisability is to say that it can survive the critique laid for it by Wayne Proudfoot in his 1985 Religious Experience and, more importantly, by the postmodern culture for which Proudfoot speaks.13 If it ignores that kind of postmodern critique, I am suggesting, it will not deliver on the promise it has shown recently in the growth of The
American Journal of Theology and Philosophy, in the founding of The Highlands Institute for
American Religious Thought, in the resurgence of Columbia and Yale forms of neonaturalism and
pragmatism in the work of Robert Corrington and William Shea, 14 and in the
American Academy of Religion Group on Empiricism in
American Religious Thought — as well as in the growing independent scholarship of those working out of the empirical side of process theology and the Chicago school.
I assume that there is nothing anywhere in religious thought quite like the combination of empiricism,
pragmatism, pluralism, meliorism, relativism, and historicism that form this
American chain of philosophical - theological work.
These ideas, in marked contrast to the whole of Christian experience, have most recently been embraced by the church growth industry, which, together with its basically sociological approach, promotes those quintessential
American values of
pragmatism and consumerism.
He began rather conventionally, writing a dissertation on
pragmatism at the University of Virginia and writing about
American political thought (an early article was on the theme of demagogy in the Federalist Papers).
Had James not cast Royce so thoroughly into his shadow — had
American philosophy followed the path of a thinker with his eye on the Absolute rather than that of the shrewder social
pragmatism of Dewey — the intellectual history of twentieth - century America might have been different.
Blacks, women and Native
Americans have lived with this kind of immoral
pragmatism with limited results.
Kelly's poker - faced
pragmatism can make him seem the quintessential homeboy, as
American as mom, apple pie, and Jasper Johns.
We therefore wonder what has happened with what was once the most identifiable brand of
American philosophy, namely
pragmatism — a philosophy that is invested in matters of fact, and tangible results?
First is the intellectual
pragmatism advocated following the
American Civil War by Oliver Wendell Holmes and William Dewey, later furthered by John Dewey and Jane Addams, and ultimately joining with environmental ethics in the tradition of Rachel Carson to form a new and distinctive «environmental
pragmatism.»
As such, Climate
Pragmatism offers a framework for renewed
American leadership on climate change that's effectiveness, paradoxically, does not depend on any agreement about climate science or the risks posed by uncontrolled greenhouse gases.
Brief Account on the 9th Latin
American Congress of Arbitration: Dogmatism and
Pragmatism in Arbitration
In this connection, it has been noted above that group care challenges some typical
American ideological notions, but success is also an
American value; to the extent that we can demonstrate effective work, the
pragmatism that seems to be part of our national character can prevail to rekindle public interest and support.