100 %
american pragmatist.
Such a brass - tacks perspective would seem to make Forge's pointillist abstractions strange bedfellows with the all - white paintings of
the American pragmatist Robert Ryman — both artists approach each new work as tabula rasa, an unpremeditated engagement with the empty surface (in a 1985 interview, Forge cites Monet's claim that he painted «as though he were a blind man who had just recovered his sight»)-- but there is an experiential connection as well.
In our verbal exchanges, I came to realize that Hafif wasn't so much a practitioner of Zen (as many would no doubt falsely believe) as she was, ultimately, a «self - reliant»
American pragmatist of the first order.
Bennett, for instance, skips over the Middle Ages, omitting everyone from Augustine to Ockham, mentions Locke and Hobbes but not Hume, Kant, or Hegel, affirms Hawthorne and Melville but not Dickinson, Faulkner but not Hemingway, and completely ignores Whitehead, Bergson, and
the American pragmatists.
Nevertheless, as Richard Bernstein has observed,
the American pragmatists — especially Peirce, James, and Dewey — had already thematized an anti-foundational approach to philosophy before the First World War.
Compiling representative anthologies of process philosophical writing, Douglas Browning in 1965 (POP) and J. R. Sibley and P. A. Y. Gunter in 1978 (PPBW) include Bergson, selections from the later evolutionary cosmology of C. S. Peirce, Samuel Alexander, and C. Lloyd Morgan along with Whitehead and several
American pragmatists as constituting the main «process philosophers.»
Quite apart from this problematic classification of Anglo - American realists and
American pragmatists (cf. GMPT 136 - 80) such conventional associations tend to obscure, rather than elucidate the influence of evolutionist theories on Whitehead's philosophical development, and do nothing to clarify the actual influence on, or to evaluate the compatibility of evolutionary cosmologies with, Whitehead's philosophy.
Third, the texts also showed common positive, though not uncriticized, influences through Bergson and
the American pragmatists — chiefly, in Whitehead's case, John Dewey.1 As a result of these positive influences, the texts displayed identical concerns for recovering the concreteness of experience, reinterpreting the body achieving a new understanding of space and time, and elucidating the immediacy of experience as a justification for philosophy itself.
She listened to lectures by
American pragmatists like John Dewey at The Cooper Union and other great thinkers at The New School for Social Research.
Not exact matches
In this season of crisis in
American religion, Jayber Crow is a consoling reminder of that faithful
pragmatist in Jesus» sermon who builds his house on the rock so that it can withstand the storm and the flood.
That was my real argument:
Americans are
pragmatists, not ideologues.
It seems improbable that our
American colleagues will ever again see the likes of the trio of great legal
pragmatists, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Benjamin Cardozo, and Learned Hand.