A document published by the Public Relations Society of America, discovered by DeSmog, reveals that from the onset of its public relations campaign, the oil industry courted mainstream media reporters to help it sell the idea of lifting the ban on crude oil exports to
the American public and policymakers.
So long as
the American public and policymakers are unaware...
Not exact matches
I highlight this part of your article because countering this argument is so critical for changing the minds of both
policymakers and the
American public.
And so the American public — and some policymakers like Perry — may perceive the situation on the ground as less serious than it
And so the
American public —
and some policymakers like Perry — may perceive the situation on the ground as less serious than it
and some
policymakers like Perry — may perceive the situation on the ground as less serious than it is.
The mission of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's Institute for 21st Century Energy is to unify
policymakers, regulators, business leaders,
and the
American public behind a common sense energy strategy to help keep America secure, prosperous,
and clean.
«We have an obligation as
policymakers and influencers to protect our youth from the lifelong health problems associated with picking up that first cigarette,» wrote Michael Seilback, vice president for
public policy
and communications for the
American Lung Association in the Northeast.
At this critical time of tax reform, widening gaps between the rich
and poor
and growing
public support for higher taxes
and redistribution to combat inequality,
policymakers should consider joint federal tax
and redistributive policies to reduce the burden of mortality among
Americans,» said Professor Kim.
During a 6 - 10 June training program, the 15 AAAS Leshner Leadership Institute fellows also engaged in interactive sessions on the science of science communication,
public attitudes about climate change, how
Americans consume science news, best practices in leveraging social media,
and the fundamentals of engaging
policymakers in science - based dialogue.
Reviewing multiple challenges now facing science, Holdren used his speech to a standing - room - only crowd at the
American Association for the Advancement of Science's Washington headquarters to focus on the obligations of scientists
and engineers to explain their research
and its implications
and share their knowledge with
policymakers and the
public.
Policymakers have struggled to specifically define «the
public interest,» but the broad intent was clear: Government rules
and programs worked to ensure a diversity of programming, distributed by a multitude of companies, with many different owners, through multiple channels that all
Americans had access to.
The Society serves scientists, health professionals,
and the
public by providing forums to: (1) share research results through the ASHG Annual Meeting
and in The
American Journal of Human Genetics; (2) advance genetic research by advocating for research support; (3) educate current
and future genetics professionals, health care providers, advocates,
policymakers, educators, students,
and the
public about all aspects of human genetics;
and (4) promote genetic services
and support responsible social
and scientific policies.
Education Week, published by the 501 (c)(3) nonprofit corporation Editorial Projects in Education (EPE), was founded in 1981 to serve the
public interest by providing independent, nonpartisan reporting
and analysis on
American precollegiate education for school leaders, other educators,
policymakers,
and members of the general
public.
While
policymakers and pundits hotly debate the merits of vouchers, national tests,
and limiting class sizes, the
American public is more interested in the qualifications of the people who work most closely with students, a survey shows.
The history of NAEP's benchmarks partially explains how
policymakers and the
public have become convinced of the catastrophic failure of
American public education.
More importantly, the accountability provisions have proven to be useful to reformers, as well as reform - minded
policymakers, researchers,
and families in advancing the systemic overhaul of
American public education.
Yes, as he says in closing, «parents
and policymakers might do a great deal to reverse the intensifying segregation of
American public education simply by educating themselves about what test scores do
and don't say about school quality... Questioning what they have long accepted, however, they might begin to create something different.»
Thanks to No Child, the work of researchers such as Robert Balfanz, Jay P. Greene,
and Christopher Swanson, the efforts of
policymakers such as former Indiana Commissioner of Higher Education Stan Jones
and Congressman - Elect Luke Messer,
and the National Governors Association, states revamped their graduation rate calculations
and admitted the abysmal state of
American public education.
Second, we believe that claims made on the basis of this flawed study feed the false hopes of many
Americans, including
policymakers, educators,
and the general
public, that we can find a single, simple solution, such as directly teaching phonics, to the real
and complex problem of improving the reading of young children in high poverty schools.
This sort of backward thinking echo back to the days before the passage of the No Child Left Behind Act in 2001, when education
policymakers and practitioners preferred to ignore the racialist policies that often made
American public education a way - station to poverty
and prison for poor
and minority children.
Viewpoints of charters are equally varied among
policymakers and education leaders, while the
American public mostly supports charters but is simultaneously confused about how they operate.
Opponents of these programs, such as People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), the
American Bird Conservancy,
and others, have for years misrepresented the science
and used scaremongering in their attempt to influence
policymakers and the
public.
Respected scientists, Nobel Laureates
and policymakers, including Lester Brown, Tony Blair,
and Dr. James Hansen, have stressed the importance of raising
public awareness about environmental degradation for 35 years; no one, to my knowledge, has examined what is actually needed in terms of communications to reach, inform, engage
and motivate millions of
Americans.
In 2012 Susan was elected a Fellow of the
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) for her «exceptional contributions in the area of science communication, particularly for communication of the science of climate change to
policymakers and the
public.»
To restore science to a place in the
American political realm, Otto contends that citizens must be better informed; that the media must work to connect the
public, scientists,
and policymakers in an objective, nonpartisan manner.
[2][3] The U.S. Chamber of Commerce runs the Institute for 21st Century Energy, now the Global Energy Insitute, a group with the stated mission to «unify
policymakers, regulators, business leaders,
and the
American public behind a common sense energy strategy to help keep America secure, prosperous,
and clean.»
In 2014, the AIA announced a partnership with the
American Institute of Architects Foundation
and Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture to form the first - ever Design
and Health Research Consortium, a group of leading academic
public health institutions
and universities that helps translate research on design's influence on
public health into architectural practice for
policymakers, design
and public health professionals
and the general
public.
Because many social scientists,
policymakers,
and members of the general
public believe that a two - parent household is the optimal setting for children's development, the decline in such households has generated widespread concern about the well - being of
American children.