Although Taja thinks often about the unspoken rules and misogyny of African
American religious culture (Sister Davis has to wear «looser skirts, lighter lipstick, and panty hose» if she wants to continue reading church announcements), she doesn't publicly challenge them with her friends or family members.
Passages that were originally written for groups of people, and intended to be read and applied in a community setting (the nation of Israel, the various early churches, the first followers of Jesus), have been manipulated to communicate a personal, individual message... thus leading the reader away from the original corporate intent of the passage to a reaffirmation of the individualistic, me - centered, and consumerist tendencies of
American religious culture.
The second effect to be considered is that on
American religious culture as a whole.
More significant also may be the particular effect the broadcasters have had on the development of
American religious culture.
Because the selective nature of television is often overlooked, the diversity of
American religious culture is in danger of being narrowed to that particular strand of religious faith which is now being promoted by television largely because of its acceptance and coherence with television's own social and economic goals.
Television's managers have exercised a powerful censoring effect on the expression of religious faith in America, giving them consequentially an exaggerated influence over the development of
American religious culture and institutions and possibly over the nature of American and even global religious life.
Indeed, the persistence of these beliefs seems to be one of the more stable elements of
American religious culture, in contrast with the serious restructuring that has taken place in many other beliefs and practices.
The biggest shift in
American religious culture in my lifetime has been the extraordinary decline of mainline Protestantism as a vital force in public life.
In relation to
American religious culture, therefore, television has exercised a major status - conferral effect, not on the basis of a representativeness, nor on a calculated moral - evaluative basis, but solely on the basis of a correspondence of a minority religious ethos with television's own economic, functional, and mythical goals.
Part of the reason for the takeover of religious television by conservative, paid - time religious broadcasters has been the changes that have occurred in
American religious culture, changes that have reduced the power of those broadcasters who represent the mainline denominations while increasing the power of those representing the conservative denominations and groups.
The dominance of religious television by this one minority expression of
American religious culture assumes more serious implications when it is considered with the factors that have influenced it, which is the substance of our next chapter.
In other words, the questions and issues I raise in the post aren't new; these questions and issues are recurring ones in
American religious culture (though they have manifested themselves differently through the years) and have been inherited by my generation.
Televangelism and African
American Religious Culture.»
Not exact matches
CNN: In
culture war skirmishes, Georgetown becomes political football In the latest round of
culture wars over contraception and
religious liberty, most
Americans would probably identify places like the White House and Congress as key battlefields.
As Todd Brenneman argues in his recent book, Homespun Gospel: The Triumph of Sentimentality in Contemporary
American Evangelicalism, sentimentality may be a defining characteristic of
religious life for many
Americans, and so most readers in the dominant Evangelical
culture, outside a few hip and urban churches, are more likely to encounter the treacly poetry of Ruth Bell Graham than the spiritually searing work of R. S. Thomas or T. S. Eliot.
Religious historian Thomas S Kidd writes, «In American pop culture parlance, «evangelical» now basically means whites who consider themselves religious and who vote Republica
Religious historian Thomas S Kidd writes, «In
American pop
culture parlance, «evangelical» now basically means whites who consider themselves
religious and who vote Republica
religious and who vote Republican.»
The Secular City helped accelerate the secularization of
American elite
culture, which created not only new openings in the public square for more - traditional
religious bodies but also new fault lines in our politics» fault lines that are as visible as this morning's headlines and op - ed pages.
As mainline Protestantism ceased to be a
culture - forming force in
American public life, the void was filled by a new Catholic presence in the public square and, perhaps most influentially in electoral terms, by the emergent activism of evangelical, fundamentalist, and Pentecostal Protestantism in what would become known as the
Religious Right» a movement that has formed a crucial part of the Republican governing coalition for more than a quarter - century.
While
culture war issues make headlines galore, an exhaustive study of
Americans»
religious attitudes shows the public as a whole might not find the debate so enticing.
Religious liberty is plainly essential for the endurance of our free society and for the protection of the rights and freedoms of the many millions of
Americans who dissent from the caustic Gnosticism that increasingly dominates our
culture.
The past two years have seen the appearance of an informative Encyclopedia of the
American Constitution (4 vols., edited by Leonard W. Levy [Macmillan]-RRB-, several outstanding studies on its intellectual background (including Forrest McDonald's Novus Ordo Seculorum: The Intellectual Origins of the Constitution [University Press of Kansas] and Morton White's Philosophy, The Federalist, and the Constitution [Oxford University Press], at least one pathbreaking effort to trace the document's role through the years (Michael Kammen's A Machine That Would Go of Itself The Constitution in
American Culture [Knopf]-RRB- and a gaggle of good books on its
religious themes (see Martin Marty's review in The Century [«James Madison Revisited,» April 9.
Some Protestant forms of communication may be so integrated into secular
American culture that we fail to see their
religious roots.
To the degree that traditional
religious groups in
American culture have emphasized the word and de-emphasized images, they have deprived themselves of an effective force for transmitting their own symbols.
More recently, the idea of plausibility structures has been employed in several studies concerned with the question of how
American evangelicals are able to maintain their traditional
religious beliefs within the secular, pluralistic context of modern
culture.
Numerous
cultures in SE Asia are changing with the times and accepting molted tail feathers from endangered hornbills species maintained in zoos instead of harvesting / killing them in the wild so that they can meet their cultural /
religious needs without killing off the species... why can't this Native
American tribe do the same?
Though Robert Handy has written of the «second disestablishment» of Protestantism (from the Depression on), until now the historical record behind the decentering of
American religious and secular
culture has been neglected.
Further, as the Cold War began, Christianity was unquestionably in control of
American culture, so much so that
religious organizations initially felt unthreatened by the new Supreme Court decisions.
It would also, I hope, go some way toward remedying the privatization and trivialization of
religious commitment that is so endemic to both
American culture in general and to academic institutions in particular.
The power of the television industry has acted in this way to shape the public perception of
American religious life and
culture, not so much by the creation of a particular phenomenon, but by the selective promotion of one particular expression over another in a way that distorts the factual situation.
In The Reason For God, Keller argues that Christians have served on the front lines of nearly every social movement toward morality and justice in modern Western civilization, including the abolition of slavery and the Civil Rights Movement in America, which is certainly true given the
religious demographics of Western and
American culture.
Even though
American people are very
religious, that does not mean the
culture is devoted to serving the God of the historic Hebrew and Christian traditions.
The paganism of
American culture is less obvious, for we do not have to contend with a government that suppresses
religious freedom or harasses
religious leaders.
That question was at the center of a recent conference at which more than 200 people assembled under the auspices of the Center for the Study and Religion and
American Culture to discuss «public
religious discourse and America's pluralistic society.»
«Ex-gay movement members, like other conservative Christians, view themselves as part of a positive transformation of
American culture and
religious life, often describing themselves as embattled or besieged by secular
culture or the gay rights movement.
Flawed and impossible though they may be at times, congregations are the most powerful antidote we have to the radical individualism that pervades
American secular and
religious culture.
«I believe the
American culture to be one of the best nurturing grounds for individuality... I hope it should go without saying that I reject blindly embracing the
religious values of different people especially when they are in violation of the law and rights of individuals.»
The
Culture of Disbelief: How
American Law and Politics Trivialize
Religious Devotion by Stephen L. Carter Basic Books, 328 pages, $ 25
Her work should be required reading not only for students of
American religion, but also for anyone who wishes to study sympathetically and fruitfully a different
religious culture.
One way of acknowledging its revisability is to say that it can survive the critique laid for it by Wayne Proudfoot in his 1985
Religious Experience and, more importantly, by the postmodern
culture for which Proudfoot speaks.13 If it ignores that kind of postmodern critique, I am suggesting, it will not deliver on the promise it has shown recently in the growth of The
American Journal of Theology and Philosophy, in the founding of The Highlands Institute for
American Religious Thought, in the resurgence of Columbia and Yale forms of neonaturalism and pragmatism in the work of Robert Corrington and William Shea, 14 and in the
American Academy of Religion Group on Empiricism in
American Religious Thought — as well as in the growing independent scholarship of those working out of the empirical side of process theology and the Chicago school.
John M. Staudenmaier, «The Influence of Communication Technologies on Modern
American Culture: A Framework for Analysis,» paper presented at the University of Dayton Conference on
Religious Telecommunications, Dayton, OH, September 26, 1988, p. 4.
A noted sociologist analyzes the reasons behind the current
religious malaise in
American culture, then proposes three possible scenarios for the future.
Americans are more
religious than most other industrialized countries, and it's holding us back, both as a nation and a
culture.
Given that these results tally with
religious and secular aims in the United States, we should anticipate that parents concerned about the direction that
American culture is taking will regard faith - based schools as providing a positive environment for their children.
To what extent are
religious television programs affecting
American culture?
The problem is that in the context of
American evangelicalism, where
religious images are often absent, pop -
culture representations of the faith can become the formative symbols and images that a faith community encounters.
In the past, the fundamentalist and evangelical traditions within Christianity have tended to stand in a counterculture relationship with
American society while the mainline churches have been more identified as a
culture - affirming
religious tradition.
Importing Vivaldi or Brahms or William Mathias into a church community whose native musical languages are closer to those of Madonna, Jimmy Buffett or John Tesh is like missionaries imposing European or North
American religious styles on drastically different
cultures.
At the very least, a renewed
culture of hospitality could help debunk what seems (at least on the Internet) to be an operating assumption of
Americans on both sides of our
religious - cultural - political divides: the belief that our «enemies» are almost uniformly malevolent and unintelligent.
What can be seen from a study of
religious uses of television in America is that over the past several years there has developed a marked imbalance in the presentation of
American religious faith and
culture.
For many years — perhaps since the Scopes trial in 1925 — the eastern secular and liberal Protestant establishments treated evangelical religion as though it were an archaic
religious form, peculiarly persistent in some regions of the country, but not a significant factor in
American culture.