Ancient human diets, like those of our fellow great apes, largely consisted of plants, so they likely produced more base than acid in the kidneys of our ancestors.
«We have used a relatively new method known as ancient starch analysis to analyse
ancient human diet.
Nuts and seeds are also the reproductive material of plants and they are both a staple of
the ancient human diet (most likely) and a nutrient and calorie - dense food.
In case you're new to the science of Paleolithic nutrition, humans don't actually need grains to survive... grains were never a part of
the ancient human diet until agriculture came around only about ten thousand years ago.
Not exact matches
It actually is possible for us to know what sort of
diet our remote ancestors ingested, because the paleontologists, (anthropologists who study
ancient sites etc) painstakingly collect
human droppings, which are then analyzed for components which tell us what they ate.
While
ancient fossils from hominins are not yet available for glycan analysis, this proof - of - concept study, published September 11, 2017 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, may set the stage for unprecedented explorations of
human origins and
diet.
«If we can then relate that to
ancient human species... What this paper shows is the sagittal crest might also play a role in how those hominins are developing social structures that can then be linked to biology beyond
diet.»
Ancient cultures around the globe have long valued organ meats as a primary staple to the
human diet.
What we do know of
human consumption of fiber is incompatible with a meat - dominant
diet; there is just too much plant matter to allow very much meat at all in
ancient diets.
Could it be
diets that incorporate the «
ancient grains» that are hot in the world of
human food right now?
For another, the
ancient canines had to adapt to their new
human environment in more ways than one — for example, their
diet changed, which favored different physical traits.