Angry people usually find it easier to get upset over the phone than in person.
Not exact matches
In a startup or any company that employs young adults, those direct commands from on high,
usually from the bossiest or
angriest person, fall flatter than a pancake.
A supervisor who is
usually gruff, cold and
angry sends each staff
person a flowery personal card of appreciation laced with superlatives.
Whenever I debate a believer, in a calm rational debate it
usually devolves into the
person defending religion getting
angry because he or she can not simply answer any question other than by saying stuff along the lines of, «well our brains are too small to understand» or «god works in mysterious ways» or my personal favorite «God will judge you for you unbelieving ways».
I
usually try to avoid an event like this since I don't do well when there are thousands of (possibly
angry)
people around me.
All are highly realistic, written in a confessional tone,
usually in the first -
person voice of an
angry or alienated teenager.
Ultimately, the
people will interpret the data correctly (
usually, and unfortunately, once they have exploited every other possibility of deluding themselves — a loose interpretation of Winston Churchill) and then they will be very
angry with those who have misled them, but invariably, it will be too late (recent examples: Iraq war [where are the WMDs again?
I am distressed and
angry that lots of
people who I
usually agree with are arguing strenuously against this carbon tax.
An
angry response is
usually just what the
person doing the bullying is after.