Anyone reading this debate would get the impression from Byrne's speech that Labour reformed welfare.
Not exact matches
For
anyone who wants to
read the best damn feature out there on this
debate — and on the epic story of the effort to find a worthy Alzheimer's drug — I recommend this 2015 Fortune classic by my colleague Erika Fry: «Can Biogen Beat The Memory Thief?»
starts my own little presidential - style
debate in which everyone gets a turn to share their positions with me (and
anyone else interested in
reading it).
that's up for
debate based on your activity level, gender and body size, but from everything I've
read and studied, I think going below 100g carbohydrates per day is rarely ever a good thing for
anyone consistently unless you have a medical issue It is just not necessary.
Anyone attending a health and safety training course or
reading guidance material will routinely hear the words used and often engage in
debate on their meaning and applicability.
A must -
read for
anyone interested in the political as well as scientific
debate.
I encourage
anyone with the intellectual integrity to look at all sides of the
debate to
read the following essays:
In 2011, the editors at the journal Nature recommended Nisbet's research as «essential
reading for
anyone with a passing interest in the climate change
debate,» and the New Republic highlighted his work as a «fascinating dissection of the shortcomings of climate activism.»
Dr. Brulle and Dr. Dunalp have just edited a new book, which synthesizes some of main sociological analysis on the climate change policy
debate which is well worth
reading by
anyone interested in climate change.
Based on
reading the work of many others on both sides if the
debate, I'm not sure I can say the same for
anyone else.
Some are criticizing Judy for using the word «dishonest», but
anyone who has
read the climategate e-mails and is familiar with the
debate over the hockey stick knows that she is being restrained in her characterization.