Before the Sabean decision, there was but one line of Court of
Appeal authority on the issue of the deductibility of CPP disability benefits under SEF44: that from NB, which NS and PEI had adopted.
In R (Pascoe) v First Secretary of State [2006] EWHC 2356 (Admin), [2006] 4 All ER 1240 Mr Justice Forbes had to choose between two differing lines of Court of
Appeal authority on the issue of proportionality in compulsory purchase cases.
Not exact matches
The department amended its regulations in the wake of a 1983 ruling by the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia in National Soft Drink Association v. Block that the department exceeded its rulemaking
authority when it
issued orders
on the «time and place» in which junk food could be sold
on school grounds.
This summer Australian
authorities had
issued a preliminary injunction
on Samsung's tablet sales, but an
appeals court has overturned that ruling.
Appeals to
authority are one thing, but no one is an
authority on the entire
issue of CAGW.
Carter Phillips is a voice of
authority in
appeals before the US Supreme Court, calling upon a wealth of accumulated knowledge to advise clients
on a broad array of constitutional
issues, administrative law matters and wider commercial disputes.
The
issue on the
appeal was whether a «judicial
authority» authorized to
issue an EAW includes a prosecutor.
On the legal custody
issue, the Court of
Appeals agreed with my client that the family court erred in finding he did not have final decision - making
authority under the previous order, finding that the old order «implicitly granted him final decision - making
authority by virtue of granting him primary legal custody.»
A recent decision of the BC Court of
Appeal argued by John Cheevers is a binding
authority on the
issue of unreasonable delay in serious criminal cases.
Case also involves consideration of
issues and argument in relation to legal principles concerning very recent Court of
Appeal authority on demurrage time - bars.
Fifth, the limitation
on the availability of
appeals of the decisions of the designated
authority raises
issues regarding procedural fairness (see section 47.5 (5)-RRB-.
On December 9, the Eleventh Circuit issued the first opinion in the country from a circuit court of appeals addressing the split of authority among the federal district and state courts on whether builders, whose developments are partially exempt under ILSA, must comply with all disclosure provision
On December 9, the Eleventh Circuit
issued the first opinion in the country from a circuit court of
appeals addressing the split of
authority among the federal district and state courts
on whether builders, whose developments are partially exempt under ILSA, must comply with all disclosure provision
on whether builders, whose developments are partially exempt under ILSA, must comply with all disclosure provisions.
«[T] he weight of
authority suggests that accurate news reporting — even when it is likely to have an adverse impact
on the subjects of the report — usually does not give rise to an action for intentional infliction of emotional distress»: Yesterday, a unanimous three - judge panel of the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
issued a decision affirming a federal district court's dismissal of claims for invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress asserted by two former undercover police officers against a television station in Albuquerque that had revealed their identities and their undercover status in the context of a televised report about their suspected involvement in an alleged incident of sexual assault.
The firm is involved in an
appeal proceeding before the Supreme Court of Canada
on the fundamental
issue regarding the possibility for a Quebec court to order the expropriation of a land being taken by public
authority in virtue of its urban planning and environmental statutory powers.
The Supreme Court of Canada weighed in
on this
issue this past summer in British Columbia (Workers» Compensation
Appeal Tribunal) v. Fraser Health
Authority.
The Court of
Appeal set out, reviewed, analysed and applied the
authorities going back to Swain v Hillman [1999] EWCA Crim 2251, [2001] 1 All ER 91
on the
issue of when summary judgment was appropriate under CPR Pt 24.
In the court's view, where, as here: (1) the Director under the OBCA
issues a certificate pursuant to a rectification order; (2) the appellant could reasonably have sought a stay of the rectification order pending
appeal; (3) the court is not satisfied that no third party acted, directly or indirectly, in reliance
on the certificate
issued pursuant to the rectification order and would not be prejudiced by its revocation; and (4) there are no special circumstances which justify exercising the power to cancel the certificate, thereby undermining certainty in a court - approved corporate fundamental change, the principle in Norcan requires the court to decline to exercise its
authority to order the revocation of that certificate or otherwise unwind the court - approved corporate fundamental change.