Sentences with phrase «appeal case highlights»

Appeal case highlights perils of personal guarantees It is now common practice for directors to enter into personal guarantees when securing funding...

One Court of Appeal case highlighted the risk: Saunders v Edwards (1987) The Times, 24 March.

Not exact matches

I will refer in particular to three criticisms highlighted in the report: the slowness to remove foreign national prisoners from the UK, the concern with the high rate of appeals brought against UKBA's decisions which are decided against the Agency, and the large number of unresolved immigration cases still awaiting decision.

And while the U.S. attorney's office can re-try the case, the appeals court decisions highlight the limits of what the court can do to prevent corruption.

The importance of understanding the identities of the parties to an agreement was highlighted in the recent case of Sino Channel Asia Ltd v Dana Shipping and Trading PTE Singapore Court of Appeal (Civil Division).

The case, Wilson v SRA, in which the client suffered a serious psychological injury working for the State Rail Authority is a highlight of his career and a landmark case, in which a full bench of the NSW Court of Appeal overturned a previous decision of that same Court.

On Friday, it didn't take long (after this blog was first to highlight the issue because I had been following the «Posner case» in detail over the years) before the appeals court ruling affirming Judge Posner's claim construction of the» 647 patent was discussed everywhere, and that was good.

Several of his cases have been highlighted in North Carolina Lawyers Weekly and the case of Stillwell v. Gust v. Stillwell, 557 S.E. 2d 627 was published by the North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Contrary to the highlighted language in the statute, the Wisconsin District IV Court of Appeals, whose district includes Dane County Circuit Court, took jurisdiction over the Clean Wisconsin case.

The confusion is understandable, given that barely two years have elapsed since the act came fully into force and that the Court of Appeal has yet to pronounce upon the key areas of controversy, but nonetheless highlights critical access to justice issues that went unobserved and unnoticed under the previous legislative regime which thirty years» of case authority had fully illuminated.

A recent case heard before the Court of Appeals for Ontario highlights the importance of unambiguous language in termination clauses, as any ambiguity will render the clause unenforceable.

The actual opinion relates to evidentiary issues resolved on appeal, but the post highlights a bizarre and startling set of facts in the case that are worth repeating.

Court News Ohio TV (CNO - TV) includes highlights of recently decided cases from the Ohio Supreme Court, the courts of appeals, and the Ohio Court of Claims; previews of upcoming cases before the Ohio Supreme Court; announcements of proposed rule changes; features on court programs; profiles of judges and court officials; and other news and information.

The case also highlights the practical importance to registrants of a focused defence, given that the professional was ultimately responsible for about $ 75,000 in tribunal costs, and additional appeal costs, reflecting in part her repeated jurisdictional arguments.

However, what is clear (and what the Court of Appeal once again highlighted in this case), is that a promise to perform an existing contract is not fresh consideration.

Recent case highlights include acting for the CMA in its defence of the paroxtine «pay for delay» decision in the Competition Appeal Tribunal; acting for Gazprom in one of the world's largest commercial arbitrations relating to transit of gas through Ukraine (where the sums in dispute exceed USD 80 billion); and acting for Bahrain in an inter-state WTO dispute concerning economic sanctions imposed on Qatar.

The need for this has been highlighted most poignantly in the recent case of Owens v Owens (2017) EWCA Civ 182, ironically heard by the Court of Appeal on Valentine's Day this year, in which a wife was refused the grant of decree nisi and her appeal dismissed on the basis that the contested allegations of her husband's unreasonable behaviour were at best fAppeal on Valentine's Day this year, in which a wife was refused the grant of decree nisi and her appeal dismissed on the basis that the contested allegations of her husband's unreasonable behaviour were at best fappeal dismissed on the basis that the contested allegations of her husband's unreasonable behaviour were at best flimsy.

The study also develops a substantiation assessment framework and highlights the implications of Drake's Harm / Evidence model for investigating maltreatment and for understanding judicial decision - making in appealed maltreatment cases.