This Court of
Appeal decision concerns a dispute over the performance of a contract.
The ECtHR reached this conclusion when it considered the Bournewood case (supra, at para 90) and, from a domestic perspective, it has been enunciated most recently in the Court of
Appeal decision concerning the Oxford Circus demonstrators (see Austin v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [2007] EWCA Civ 989, [2007] All ER (D) 197 (Oct)-RRB-.
A statement regarding the right of the family to
appeal decisions concerning adoption assistance and the procedure for doing so.
Not exact matches
Starbucks shares the
concerns expressed by the Netherlands government that there are significant errors in the
decision, and we support the Dutch government's
appeal efforts.
In a statement, the University of Sheffield said: «The individual
concerned is currently
appealing the
decision of a Fitness to Practise Committee, relating to professional registration and the standards of the relevant professional body.
I conclude that Craig and the process theist are at an impasse so that if a
decision is to be made
concerning the cognitive superiority of either the kalam or process theistic models, this must be made by
appeal to issues in philosophical theology other than the question of the extension of the past.
A financial boost will surely help him make that
decision too, but the
appeal of playing for a European giant like Real Madrid will surely raise
concerns.
«In order to encourage more people to get on their bikes, it is crucial that politicians and
decision makers take on board safety
concerns, and ensure that our roads are
appealing, safe shared spaces which can be used conveniently by all road users, regardless of their chosen method of transport.»
I will refer in particular to three criticisms highlighted in the report: the slowness to remove foreign national prisoners from the UK, the
concern with the high rate of
appeals brought against UKBA's
decisions which are decided against the Agency, and the large number of unresolved immigration cases still awaiting
decision.
A similar
decision earlier this month by a federal judge
concerning nuclear subsidies in Illinois was
appealed by the non-nuclear generating companies that filed the lawsuit.
The Director and his staff are passionate, caring, and
concerned representatives and, as such are able to present claims for further development, institute
appeals from Veterans Administration
decisions, and follow through to final disposition with representation in Washington.
Moreover, states wishing to implement bans are not required to scientifically justify their
decisions and can
appeal to more arbitrary
concerns such as fears of GMOs contaminating other non-GM produce and likely public backlashes over use and cultivation.
Realizing that science may not be the driving factor in
decision - making, and recognizing the other issues people are
concerned about can also help scientists frame information to better
appeal to a particular audience.
However, the common belief now is that Paramount «dumped» Cloverfield Paradox on Netflix over
concerns about the film's quality, whereas its deal with Netflix for Annihilation was more of a pure business
decision motivated by
concerns that Garland's movie is «too cerebral» to achieve crossover
appeal.
The school director will first investigate the matter to ensure that Steps 1 and 2 have been appropriately documented and completed, then record the complaint and / or
appeal and will address any
concerns regarding
appeal of a disciplinary
decision, or any action or inaction taken by the school administration, within three school days of the
appeal and within five days from the time the complaint is introduced.
Youth
Appeal Decision in Landmark Federal Constitutional Litigation
Concerning Climate Change
For cynics it could also be a purely political
decision driven by an Administration more
concerned with votes,
appealing to base support and political ambition than anything else.
A precedent - setting
decision at the Ontario Court of
Appeal this week strikes at the heart of client
concerns over the abuse of billable hours, and provides a legal framework by which clients might be able to reject law firm fees considered excessive or unreasonable.
This
concern motivated the Ontario Court of
Appeal in Eliopoulos Estate (discussed above) to hold that «impos [ing] a private law duty... would create an unreasonable and undesirable burden... that would interfere with sound
decision - making in the realm of public health.»
After Schlosser's
decision, lawyers voiced
concerns that the order would have a chilling effect on potential sources coming forward to the media if it was not overturned on
appeal.
CCLA is
concerned that a recent B.C. Court of
Appeal decision may set a precedent that could negatively affect the free and open nature of the Internet.
Court of
Appeal Decision The Court of
Appeal, in a judgment written by Mr. Justice Tang, the Vice President, with Madam Justice Kwan and Mr. Justice Fok concurring, indicated that its approach is to
concern itself with the «structural integrity of the arbitration proceedings».
Paul Cahill succeeds in reviewing a
decision of the Complaints Committee of College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario at the Health Professionals
Appeal and Review Board
concerning a family physician's failure to diagnose colorectal cancer.
This was an
appeal against a
decision of Bean J to reject a judicial review of the Parking Adjudicator's
decision in a test case
concerning the effect of alleged defects in traffic signs and road markings on the liability to pay the penalty charge (a parking ticket).
There has been significant discussion in recent weeks
concerning the recent Alberta Court of
Appeal decision on random workplace drug testing.
The Ontario Court of
Appeal's recent
decision in Strudwick v. Applied Consumer & Clinical Evaluations Inc. («Strudwick») provides a useful clarification to all litigants, but especially those
concerned with employment law matters, on the nature of various heads of damages and the general rule that «You don't get what you don't ask for.»
18 Nevertheless, because most of the
appeal decisions on the standard in summary judgment have involved concerns of a lack of procedural fairness rather than a lack of efficiency, this asymmetry could have a conservative influence on the overall approach recommended by the Court of A
appeal decisions on the standard in summary judgment have involved
concerns of a lack of procedural fairness rather than a lack of efficiency, this asymmetry could have a conservative influence on the overall approach recommended by the Court of
AppealAppeal.
The
appeal concerned two social welfare cases for which the Minister of Employment and Social Solidarity had applied for a review of
decisions rendered by the Administrative Tribunal of Québec, and presented motions for review that had been prepared, drawn up, signed and filed by someone who was not a member of the bar.
A simple search of published court
decisions shows that Wikipedia is frequently cited by judges around the country, involving serious issues and the bizarre — such as a 2005 tax case before the Tennessee Court of
Appeals concerning the definition of «beverage» that involved hundreds of thousands of dollars, and, just this week, a case in Federal District Court in Florida that involved the term «booty music» as played during a wet T - shirt contest.
This departure was illustrated by the Court of
Appeal's
decision in McCoubrey v Ministry of Defence [2007] EWCA Civ 17, [2007] All ER (D) 185 (Jan), a case
concerning a soldier who suffered an injury resulting in hearing loss.
For those seeking additional information on Twitter
concerning Canadian law, Fodden has also created a number of Twitter feeds to allow ready access to Supreme Court of Canada
decisions and court of
appeal decisions for many Canadian provinces.
The Supreme Court of Canada will hear four
appeals this week, including an aboriginal law case
concerning the duty of consult, two criminal cases and the B.C. Crown's
appeal of a
decision ordering it to turn over data to a major tobacco company in response to the province's bid to recover health - care costs.
This comment looks at a recent
decision of the Saskatchewan Court of
Appeal concerning the judicial review of a mineral royalty
decision made by Saskatchewan's Minister of Energy and Resources.
The February 11, 2013, issue of Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly features Shannon Lynch in an article about a recent
decision from the Massachusetts
Appeals Court
concerning the firing of an employee who alleged that a manager engaged in sexist behavior.
He had an integral role in the first case heard by the Quebec Court of
Appeal since the Supreme Court of Canada's
decision in Progressive Homes Ltd. v. Lombard General Insurance Co. of Canada
concerning the extent of the exclusion regarding work performed by the insured.
«TCC claims 2.1 The following are examples of the types of claim which it may be appropriate to bring as TCC claims --(a) building or other construction disputes, including claims for the enforcement of the
decisions of adjudicators under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996; (b) engineering disputes; (c) claims by and against engineers, architects, surveyors, accountants and other specialised advisers relating to the services they provide; (d) claims by and against local authorities relating to their statutory duties
concerning the development of land or the construction of buildings; (e) claims relating to the design, supply and installation of computers, computer software and related network systems; (f) claims relating to the quality of goods sold or hired, and work done, materials supplied or services rendered; (g) claims between landlord and tenant for breach of a repairing covenant; (h) claims between neighbours, owners and occupiers of land in trespass, nuisance etc; (i) claims relating to the environment (for example, pollution cases); (j) claims arising out of fires; (k) claims involving taking of accounts where these are complicated; and (l) challenges to
decisions of arbitrators in construction and engineering disputes including applications for permission to
appeal and
appeals.»
The Court of
Appeal found that the
decision of the patient may be based upon many factors, which included the patient herself and that it was for the patient to decide the risks they wished to take
concerning their body — including the risks posed to a foetus.
The
appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada will be heard together with an
appeal from Ontario, also
concerning a
decision to deny accreditation to the proposed law school by the Law Society of Ontario (LSO)(formerly the Law Society of Upper Canada).
Petroleum Company of Trinidad and Tobago Limited (Appellant) v Ryan and another (Respondents)(Trinidad and Tobago)[2017] UKPC 30 Junior counsel representing the company on
appeal to the Privy Council to set aside the Court of Appeal's decision to reverse the trial judge's dismissal of a claim concerning the escape of hydrocarbon fumes from an oil well causing medical compl
appeal to the Privy Council to set aside the Court of
Appeal's decision to reverse the trial judge's dismissal of a claim concerning the escape of hydrocarbon fumes from an oil well causing medical compl
Appeal's
decision to reverse the trial judge's dismissal of a claim
concerning the escape of hydrocarbon fumes from an oil well causing medical complaints.
Judge Coulson's
decision in the Technology and Construction Court published last week, his last before moving to the Court of
Appeal,
concerns the infamous «smash and grab» adjudications.
As mentioned above, the case
concerned an
appeal by the employer, Select Wine Merchants, from the
decision of Small Claims Court Deputy Judge Richardson, who awarded the respondent employee four months» pay in lieu of notice.
This personal injury
decision concerned an
appeal from a Master dismissing ICBC's court application for a copy of the claimant's Medical Service Plan Claim.
First published by De Voil Indirect Tax Intelligence, Issue 133, June 2007 Lime Avenue Sales and Services Ltd and Benenden School Trust v Revenue and Customs Commissioners (2007) VAT
Decision 20140 was a Tribunal
appeal concerning alleged abusive practices in the education sector.
The surprise
decision upholds a unanimous
decision last month by five Quebec Court of
Appeal judges, in which the court overturned a Quebec Superior Court ruling that had endorsed the BCE takeover and dismissed the objections of Bell bondholders
concerned the deal would harm the value of their investment.
A recent US Court of
Appeals decision has caused some
concern in banking circles.
Such a stretch of the
decision in 1997 of Malik and Mahmud v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA (in compulsory liquidation [1997] 3 All ER 1 (
concerning a duty not to run a corrupt and dishonest business so as to damage the employees» future employment prospects) was denied in Johnson v Unisys Ltd [2001] UKHL 13 by the Court of
Appeal and then the House of Lords, which considered it unnecessary to develop the common law to overlap this remedy.
One would think that the defendant's lawyers would be excited about the
decision (though apparently they did not argue the
appeal)-- but instead, Gordon's partner Henslee expressed
concerns over the court's ruling.
However, as far as Mrs Walkden's case for mistake is
concerned, the Court of
Appeal followed the more recent
decision in Judge v Judge [2008] EWCA Civ 1458, [2009] 1 FLR 1287 in which Wilson LJ ruled that mistake no longer falls within the Barder principle as it does not rely on new or supervening events.
One of the main reasons given by Lord Clarke for not always enforcing the black letter terms of written employment contracts was taken from the
decision of Elias J in the Employment
Appeal Tribunal in Consistent Group: «The
concern to which tribunals must be alive is that armies of lawyers will simply place substitution clauses, or clauses denying any obligation to accept or provide work in employment contracts, as a matter of form, even where such terms do not begin to reflect the real relationship.»
In that context, it should be observed that the reasoning of the
decision of a Board of
Appeal may be implicit, on condition that it enables the persons
concerned to know the reasons for the Board of
Appeal's
decision and provides the competent Court with sufficient material for it to exercise its power of review (Case T ‑ 304 / 06 Reber v OHIM — Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli (Mozart)[2008] ECR II ‑ 1927, paragraph 55).