The Federal Court of Appeal on June 27, 2014 has given its judgments in Catherine Leuthold's two uphill
appeals in a case about which I have written earlier at length.
West Coast LEAF will also be intervening at the BC Court of
Appeal in a case about when and how the governing bodies of healthcare professions can act to protect the public in response to a complaint of sexual misconduct against a healthcare practitioner.
Not exact matches
7th US Circuit Court of
Appeals nominee Amy Coney Barrett, a Notre Dame law professor, was questioned intensely
about her Catholic faith as a result of past writings expressing her beliefs on whether Catholic judges should recuse themselves from death - penalty
cases if they believed they would be unable to impartially uphold the law, writing that —
in limited situations — judges should step back
in cases that conflict with their personal conscience.
Goa, who
appealed about double jeopardy
in the
case, felt that they should not be punished twice for the same offence.
There are also complaints
about restrictions on
appeals in immigration
cases, given the often - haphazard nature of the decisions made by the Home Office.
Other examples would include Moos and McClure (where the Court of
Appeal overturned the only successful kettling
case to date) and the admittedly contentious decision
in Abdul v DPP - the conviction under section five of the Public Order Act 1986 of those protesting
in fairly vituperative terms («baby killers», «rapists», «murderers» etc)
about the war
in Iraq at a homecoming for British troops.
Hirschman suggests that the
appeal of exit not only increases with the level of discontent
about the organization —
in this
case the EU or the Eurozone — but also with the creeping sentiment of being unable to change it.
5.3 All the people of Rep. of Cyprus (even the President of RoC) MUST apply to the LEGAL SYSTEM of Northern Cyprus
about an issue related with north Cyprus
in order to take their
cases to the ECtHR: ECtHR 04.01.2011 decision: «the procedure before the Immovable Property Commission («IPC»), and further
appeal to the «TRNC» High Administrative Court, provided for
in Law 67/2005, were to be regarded as «domestic remedies» of the respondent State and that NO GROUND OF EXEMPTION has been established
in that regard».
But the
case finally reached the Supreme Court
in 2006 — that was after it had spent a cumulative period of
about seven years at the Federal High Court and the Court of
Appeal.
If, as appears to be the
case, the New Rochelle Police Department hushed up Latimer's car crash to shield her from unwanted attention on her relationship with Latimer you start to raise questions
about ethical behavior by a sitting judge
in New York State and conflicts of interest because one of three ways a Judge can be removed from the bench is to be impeached by a majority vote of the assembly then removed by a two - thirds vote a special court made up of judges of the court of
appeals.
[19] When the
case came to the Court of
Appeal, the payment was restored
in a judgement that was highly critical of the Department, including quoting her complaint that Johnson had made «personal comments made
about me... without any reference to the Trust, or informing me,... regarding my severance value and its non-payment».
Lynn Pasahow, an attorney with Fenwick & West
in Mountain View, California, who represented the UC
in the
case said no decision has yet been made
about whether there will be an
appeal.
Although Lamberth hasn't yet set a schedule for both sides to file documents
in the
case, the expectation is that he would not move ahead before the
appeals court has made a decision
about the Department of Justice's (DOJ's) request to stay the preliminary injunction.
Yesterday, the same day an
appeals court questioned lawyers
about the
case, the government filed documents
in a lower court arguing that the lawsuit brought by two researchers who oppose human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research should be thrown out.
Although it could be a while before drivers receive information
about parking fines on their computers at home, all the evidence
in appeals cases is already stored electronically.
Such was the stalemate between these elephantine contenders that the courtroom erupted
in laughter last January after DeGrasse asked the lawyers
in the
case about the likelihood that the state would file an
appeal.
Also here is an article just released
in the Santa Fe New Mexican
about this ruling, also
about how the «
Appeals court reject [ed the state's] request to intervene
in [this] teacher evaluation
case.»
For those thinking
about getting one or the other as a gift,
in most
cases giving a tablet as a gift is going to be more
appealing to the person receiving it, unless they are hardcore readers then go with a Kindle Paperwhite or Kindle Voyage.
Mansour v. King deals with due process
in dangerous dog
cases and is very clear
about the standards and rules for the
case,
appeals and keeping of records involved.
While we're on the topic of cosmetic
appeal, the design of the station fits seamlessly with the PS4's minimalist aesthetic, all sharp angles, clean lines, and —
in case you're concerned
about how it changes the overall form factor — slim design that will help you save space.
This isn't a
case of the game being simple to jump
in to, because that's covered above, but it's
about presenting the world as something that
appeals to people who don't even call themselves gamers.
IN a closely watched copyright case with broad implications for the contemporary - art world, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on Thursday decided largely in favor of the artist Richard Prince, who was found by a federal court in 2011 to have illegally used photographs from a book about Rastafarians to create a series of collages and painting
IN a closely watched copyright
case with broad implications for the contemporary - art world, the United States Court of
Appeals for the Second Circuit on Thursday decided largely
in favor of the artist Richard Prince, who was found by a federal court in 2011 to have illegally used photographs from a book about Rastafarians to create a series of collages and painting
in favor of the artist Richard Prince, who was found by a federal court
in 2011 to have illegally used photographs from a book about Rastafarians to create a series of collages and painting
in 2011 to have illegally used photographs from a book
about Rastafarians to create a series of collages and paintings.
John Oliver has an interesting story
about how Philip Morris threatened to sue Togo by
appealing to a
case against the Australian government they
in fact lost:
Courts can also move the trial to a new location; they can grant motions from the defense to delay the trial while things cool down; they can sequester the jurors (meaning that the jurors are kept
in a central place and prevented from talking to anyone else or reading anything
about the
case); if none of these are done, a conviction can potentially be reversed on
appeal.
Earlier this month the Court of
Appeals of Indiana ruled (via Deliberations)
in an interesting
case that involved a jury deciding that a plaintiff should be awarded $ 336,300
in damages, but failing to adequately communicate that to the court because of confusion
about how the verdict form worked.
The Supreme Court of Canada will hear five
appeals this week, including three criminal
cases involving driving «over 80» and production of evidence; an unjust enrichment claim; and an
appeal in a sexual assault case in which the Court of Appeal of Alberta had found that a trial judge had erred by relying on a stereotype about the behaviour of sexual assault vi
appeal in a sexual assault
case in which the Court of
Appeal of Alberta had found that a trial judge had erred by relying on a stereotype about the behaviour of sexual assault vi
Appeal of Alberta had found that a trial judge had erred by relying on a stereotype
about the behaviour of sexual assault victims.
After the client
appealed the fees to an assessment officer, a source provided the client's affidavit
in the matter to Thornton, who then used it to write columns
about the high legal costs
in family law
cases.
We have written
about the Arizona Court of
Appeals decision in the Van Dyke v. Steinle case in which the court of appeals had to determine if a basis to terminate spousal maintenance exists when a former spouse receiving the spousal maintenance moves in with a love interest and is now sharing living costs with the new love in
Appeals decision
in the Van Dyke v. Steinle
case in which the court of
appeals had to determine if a basis to terminate spousal maintenance exists when a former spouse receiving the spousal maintenance moves in with a love interest and is now sharing living costs with the new love in
appeals had to determine if a basis to terminate spousal maintenance exists when a former spouse receiving the spousal maintenance moves
in with a love interest and is now sharing living costs with the new love interest.
Recently, a reporter for WBAP Radio
in Fort Worth spoke to her
about the challenges involved
in appealing a divorce
case.
Young legal aid life: our latest column for Legal Voice on a day
in the life of young legal aid lawyers was written by YLAL committee member Katherine Barnes
about her experience acting
in an
appeal against a child's education, health and care plan
in which the child's mother was unrepresented due to the withdrawal of legal aid for representation
in education
cases.
Among his more substantial claims, Ed has acted
in a recent
appeal about the proper measure of damages
in a concurrent liability
case and led
in a professional negligence claim against a criminal silk for his negligent conduct of an 8 - month fraud trial.
(4) Successfully representing a Chartered Surveyor at the RICS
appeal tribunal, (
in a
case about referral fees) whose expulsion was set aside.
This may not sound like an earth shattering proposition, but what is so unique
about John's blog is that he discusses the judgements awarded after reviewing the records on
appeal and analyzing the plaintiff's underlying injuries, many of which are not disclosed
in the published
cases.
is designed to provide reporters, lawyers, educators, and the public with prompt, accurate, unbiased information
about newsworthy and legally significant
cases pending
in and decided by the Federal Courts of
Appeals... Use this Web site to find short summaries of recent opinions of public interest and noteworthy
cases pending oral argument.
The Supreme Court of Canada will hear five
appeals this week, including the closely watched
case about a former equity partner's mandatory retirement
in McCormick v. Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP.
It's no surprise, then, that there's been so much discussion around the Ontario Court of
Appeal's decision
in Re: Indalex Ltd., a
case Hatnay was involved
in and spoke
about during a session on disputes over underfunded pension plans.
The separation and move of the Board of
Appeals at the European Patent Office is
in my view likely to result
in the backlog of unresolved
cases being shifted to the forum of
Appeal, where we are talking
about several years before
cases may be resolved.
In June, for example, the court ordered the defendants to provide information about its customers within 10 days of an Ontario Court of Appeal ruling in the cas
In June, for example, the court ordered the defendants to provide information
about its customers within 10 days of an Ontario Court of
Appeal ruling
in the cas
in the
case.
The Court of
Appeal did attempt, however, to set down clear guidance
about the principles to be extracted from the
case law, and
in particular from Miller; McFarlane.
There appear to be
about a dozen wiretapping
cases that made it to the court of
appeals in Maryland, and none of them involve implied consent (e.g. where it is announced prior to recording that the call may or will be recorded — prior is mandatory).
For instance, what
about the obligation to scream out, «Fore!!!??» The AP reports that tomorrow, the New York Court of
Appeals will hear oral argument
in the
case of two doctors who were playing golf together.
Last week I blogged
about some stats on decisions
in civil
cases at the Ontario Court of
Appeal.
In this
case the Court of
Appeal restored an employment tribunal's decision that a consultant doctor had been automatically unfairly dismissed because he made protected disclosures
about patient safety.
In respect of employees who are suspended, sick, on holiday, on study leave or on maternity leave at the date of the transfer, the question about whether they transfer to the new contractor was answered by HHJ Burke QC in Fairhurst Ward Abbotts Ltd v Botes Building Ltd [2003] EAT / 1007/00 / DA (March 2003), subsequently approved by the Court of Appeal [2004] IRLR 304 and followed in the writer's own case of United Guarding Services v St James Security Group Ltd [2004] All ER (D) 158 (EAT
In respect of employees who are suspended, sick, on holiday, on study leave or on maternity leave at the date of the transfer, the question
about whether they transfer to the new contractor was answered by HHJ Burke QC
in Fairhurst Ward Abbotts Ltd v Botes Building Ltd [2003] EAT / 1007/00 / DA (March 2003), subsequently approved by the Court of Appeal [2004] IRLR 304 and followed in the writer's own case of United Guarding Services v St James Security Group Ltd [2004] All ER (D) 158 (EAT
in Fairhurst Ward Abbotts Ltd v Botes Building Ltd [2003] EAT / 1007/00 / DA (March 2003), subsequently approved by the Court of
Appeal [2004] IRLR 304 and followed
in the writer's own case of United Guarding Services v St James Security Group Ltd [2004] All ER (D) 158 (EAT
in the writer's own
case of United Guarding Services v St James Security Group Ltd [2004] All ER (D) 158 (EAT):
The Florida First District Court of
Appeal has overturned an order
in a workers» compensation
case, ruling that a worker forfeited his right to benefits for a workplace accident after he offered conflicting details
about his medical history and the cause of his injuries.
This site offers information
about how to sue
in small claims court, what to do if you are sued, how to prepare for a hearing, what to do
in a hearing, how to
appeal a small claims judgment, and how to collect a judgment if you do win your
case in small claims court.
In Copley v Lawn and another case [2009] EWCA Civ 580 the Court of Appeal held — and its decision has implications in non-credit hire cases too — that it was not unreasonable for a claimant to reject or ignore an offer from the defendant or his insurers which did not make clear the cost of hire to the defendant for the purpose of enabling the claimant to make a reasonable comparison with the cost which he is incurring or is about to incu
In Copley v Lawn and another
case [2009] EWCA Civ 580 the Court of
Appeal held — and its decision has implications
in non-credit hire cases too — that it was not unreasonable for a claimant to reject or ignore an offer from the defendant or his insurers which did not make clear the cost of hire to the defendant for the purpose of enabling the claimant to make a reasonable comparison with the cost which he is incurring or is about to incu
in non-credit hire
cases too — that it was not unreasonable for a claimant to reject or ignore an offer from the defendant or his insurers which did not make clear the cost of hire to the defendant for the purpose of enabling the claimant to make a reasonable comparison with the cost which he is incurring or is
about to incur.
It points to the 1972
case United States V. Dougherty, decided 2 - 1 by the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia, as the benchmark
case in which the Court ruled that judges aren't required to inform jurors
about nullification because this power is «implied»
in the overall instructions.
With an
appeal pending
in the Aslam
case Uber must have been nervous
about the AG's short excursus into the relationship between Uber and its drivers.
Lawyers do not have a first amendment right when it comes to disrespectful speech
about judges, the Eleventh Circuit Court of
Appeals ruled
in the unpublished case In re: Kevin Christopher Gleason (12 - 11433
in the unpublished
case In re: Kevin Christopher Gleason (12 - 11433
In re: Kevin Christopher Gleason (12 - 11433).