Sentences with phrase «appeal judgment in»

Following yesterday's Court of Appeal judgment in relation to Sharp v Sharp, ruling in Julie Sharp's favour, Mr Sharp has been awarded # 2 million in total, less than the initial # 2.74 million awarded in 2015 but more than Mrs Sharp's request of only # 1.2 million.

The Court of Appeal judgment in UBS AG and UBS Securities LLC v HSH Nordbank AG [2009] All ER (D) 190 (Jun) concerned a dispute between two banks over alleged mis - selling and mismanagement of collateralised debt obligations (CDOs).

A recent Court of Appeal judgment in Enviroco Limited v Farstad Supply A / S [2009] EWCA Civ 1399, [2009] All ER (D) 206 (Dec) initially caused some consternation in legal and banking circles.

However, HMRC would need to win on both of those points in order to overturn the Court of Appeal judgment in the taxpayers» favour,» he adds.

In his Court of Appeal judgment in Meadow, Thorpe LJ stated (at para 207):

As insurers continue to face ostensibly stale claims for noise induced hearing loss and other occupational diseases the Court of Appeal judgment in Pratt v BRB (Residuary) Ltd [2014] EWCA 1401 will an important tool in a defendant's locker for some time to come.

advising a hedge fund before the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in its successful defence of a Court of Appeal judgment in relation to the status of client monies in the Lehman administration.

The appeal judgment in the case of Gudanaviciene & others is available on BAILII here.

Simon Creighton spoke about the recent Court of Appeal judgment in the case of R (on the application of the Howard League) v. Lord Chancellor [2017] EWCA Civ 244.

She also cited the 1917 Ontario Court of Appeal judgment in Campbell v. Hedley, the only case dealing with an escaped animal (a fox in that case), which teaches the legal distinctions between tame and wild animals.

We on the Court of Appeal judgment in Huzar v Jet2 affecting airline passengers rights to compensation payments for delay or cancellation.

The news comes as the LSC confirms plans to appeal the judgment in the judicial review brought against the unified contract by the Law Society, R (on the application of the Law Society) v Legal Services Commission.

The recent Court of Appeal judgment in Tchenguiz v Imerman; Imerman v Imerman [2010] EWCA Civ 908, [2010] All ER (D) 320 (Jul), however, has revealed the Hildebrand rules to be nothing more than a myth, condemning them as «unlawful».

A statement by the chairman of the campaign organization, Sir Edwin Uboo in Awka, said that the organisation was particularly angered by Umeh's alleged continued deliberate malicious misinterpretation, misrepresentation and sentimentalization of the Court of Appeal judgment in Enugu that Ekwunife was disqualified from contesting the scheduled fresh election expected to hold in March, 2016.

The industry groups appealed the judgment in August 2013.

Our production of Court of Appeal judgments in English has increased significantly over the last two years with the hiring of a second translator thanks to a grant from the federal government.

In Hospadales v. McCoy, the defendants appealed a judgment in a truck accident case that awarded the plaintiff damages in the amount of $ 292,000 for past pain and suffering, past medical expenses, and past lost earning capacity.

Not exact matches

In an emailed statement, a Gawker spokesman said that nothing has changed, and that the company has «always said we're exploring contingency plans of various sorts» in case the Hogan judgment is upheld on appeaIn an emailed statement, a Gawker spokesman said that nothing has changed, and that the company has «always said we're exploring contingency plans of various sorts» in case the Hogan judgment is upheld on appeain case the Hogan judgment is upheld on appeal.

An Ontario Court of Appeal justice has warned against «summary judgment at all costs» in her dissent of a ruling on the application of the doctrine of emergency in a personal injury case.

Appellate court confirms judgment against Credit Suisse Group AG DALLAS — February 21, 2018 — Highland Capital Management Fund Advisors, L.P. and NexPoint Advisors, L.P. announce today that the Texas Court of Appeals confirmed an aggregate $ 351 million award in favor of the Highland Floating Rate Opportunities Fund (NYSE: HFRO)(«HFRO») and the NexPoint Credit Strategies Fund (NYSE: NHF)(«NHF», and together with HFRO, the...

The sale and filing are intended to preserve the value of GMG's pioneering digital news business, safeguard the jobs of journalists and other staff, and allow GMG to fund the appeal against the $ 130 million judgment in the Hulk Hogan case against the company in a Florida state court.

An appeals court in Sudan ruled that a lower court's judgment against the 27 - year - old was faulty, her lawyer, Mohaned Mustafa El - Nour, said Monday.

To say «Our Father» is to put oneself into God's hands, to submit to his decisions, to trust in his mercy — and to appeal the unjust judgments of men to the just judgment of God.

In that this exhortation to deeds of love is sanctioned by an appeal to the eschatological judgment, at which Jesus appears as Son of Man and judge, however, the lure toward love is bracketed by an implicit recognition of its confessional context.

Also appealing is Epstein's assertion of judgment in such matters as dress («The baseball cap marks a steep decline in elegant male attire» and «The notion of having shined shoes speaks to holding up standards, even if in a very minor way»).

It is based on the fact that in the Church among all human communities men can most directly appeal to the reigning Christ's judgment upon the community itself.

Although Sacks appeals to Kant when claiming that «judgment is the most important faculty we have,» he means by judgment more than what Kant had in mind.

It is to be observed that in these passages the fact of judgment to come is appealed to as a dalum of faith.

If in earlier situations the standards of critical judgment that properly applied to foundational theological assertions allowed for appeals to authorities of various kinds to settle the issue of their credibility, for us today all such appeals can have at most a provisional validity.

Wednesday evening, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who handles emergency appeals from the 10th Circuit Court, said the company failed to meet «the demanding standard for the extraordinary relief,» and that it could continue to pursue its challenge in lower courts and return to the higher court, if necessary, after a final judgment.

The British Court of Appeal determined that her refusal amounted to discrimination and found that she offended gay colleagues in the office with her refusal; in addition to that, in the court's judgment, Ladele's views on marriage are not «a core part of her religion.»

It is also about how the Roman Catholic Church employs this appeal today, not only in its conception of its own authority, but more importantly, in its judgment of the authority of those Christian traditions, say Lutheranism or Presbyterianism, well beyond its walls.

Those who responded to this appeal and placed themselves under the judgment and mercy of God as declared in Jesus Christ, became members of the community, the Church, within which the new life could be lived.

And a pastor who fails to instruct a misguided conscience seems to have forgotten that appeals to false conscience will offer no protection in the final judgment.

However, their message of the immediate coming of God's judgment met with great appeal in an age disillusioned with the disappointments of life.

Like the Franciscan also it protests against the ecclesiastical order, a protest which appeals to the New Testament witness to Jesus Christ in judgment against the authority of the ecclesiastical tradition.

To make this point, Pope Francis appeals here in this address and elsewhere to John XXIII's words at Vatican II, Gaudet Mater Ecclesia: «For the deposit of faith, the truths contained in our sacred teaching, are one thing; the mode in which they are expressed, but with the same meaning and the same judgment [eodem sensu eademque sententia], is another thing.»

The Full Federal Court (comprising Justice Besanko, Justice Perram and Justice Robertson) handed down its judgment on the appeals by ACCC and Crownbet against the decision of the Australian Competition Tribunal in relation to the Tatts / Tabcorp merger authorisation.

In a case similar to the Gaidry case, New Iberia Extract Co. v. McIlhenny Sons, the New Iberia Company had recently recovered damages against McIlhenny Sons in the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on a similar cause of action, New Iberia Extract Co. v. E. McIlhenny, 182 La. 150 [8 T. M. Rep. 189], the decision having been based largely on the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, cancelling the Mcllhenny Company registration of «Tabasco» as its trade - marIn a case similar to the Gaidry case, New Iberia Extract Co. v. McIlhenny Sons, the New Iberia Company had recently recovered damages against McIlhenny Sons in the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on a similar cause of action, New Iberia Extract Co. v. E. McIlhenny, 182 La. 150 [8 T. M. Rep. 189], the decision having been based largely on the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, cancelling the Mcllhenny Company registration of «Tabasco» as its trade - marin the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on a similar cause of action, New Iberia Extract Co. v. E. McIlhenny, 182 La. 150 [8 T. M. Rep. 189], the decision having been based largely on the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, cancelling the Mcllhenny Company registration of «Tabasco» as its trade - mark.

The Full Federal Court today handed down its decision in relation to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission's appeal against the judgment in ACCC v Lux Distributors Pty Ltd..

Two of the three - man CAS panel in Atletico's case also sat in judgment of Barcelona's appeal in 2014 — and reached the same conclusion.

But in their notice of appeal, the APC and Mr Umana faulted the Tribunal's judgment on grounds of «miscarriage of justice and turning upside down, the head of the natural justice».

Akwa Ibom State All Progressives Congress (APC) and its governorship candidate in the April 11 gubernatorial election, Mr Umana Okon Umana, has approached the Appellate Court in Abuja on Friday, to file an appeal challenging the judgment of the state Governorship Election Petition Tribunal on the poll.

In the same vein, his deputy, Mr Yomi Awoniyi said that the People Democratic Party (PDP) would appeal the judgment of the Kogi State Election Petition Tribunal.

«Governor Ikpeazu, who has faith in the judiciary and rule of law, has instructed his lawyers to file an appeal immediately against the said judgment».

«Our lawyers are already reviewing the judgment with a sound mind to appeal, we absolutely believe in the efficacy of our justice system.

In an appeal he filed through his team of lawyers headed by J.B Daudu, SAN, Saraki prayed for «An order staying further proceedings in Charge No: CCT / ABJ / 01 / 2015 between Federal Republic of Nigeria vs Dr. Olubukola Abubakar Saraki fixed for hearing on November 5 and 6, 2015 pending the determination of the appeal pending before the Supreme Court against the judgment of the Court of Appeal dated October 30, 2015.&raquIn an appeal he filed through his team of lawyers headed by J.B Daudu, SAN, Saraki prayed for «An order staying further proceedings in Charge No: CCT / ABJ / 01 / 2015 between Federal Republic of Nigeria vs Dr. Olubukola Abubakar Saraki fixed for hearing on November 5 and 6, 2015 pending the determination of the appeal pending before the Supreme Court against the judgment of the Court of Appeal dated October 30, 2015.&appeal he filed through his team of lawyers headed by J.B Daudu, SAN, Saraki prayed for «An order staying further proceedings in Charge No: CCT / ABJ / 01 / 2015 between Federal Republic of Nigeria vs Dr. Olubukola Abubakar Saraki fixed for hearing on November 5 and 6, 2015 pending the determination of the appeal pending before the Supreme Court against the judgment of the Court of Appeal dated October 30, 2015.&raquin Charge No: CCT / ABJ / 01 / 2015 between Federal Republic of Nigeria vs Dr. Olubukola Abubakar Saraki fixed for hearing on November 5 and 6, 2015 pending the determination of the appeal pending before the Supreme Court against the judgment of the Court of Appeal dated October 30, 2015.&appeal pending before the Supreme Court against the judgment of the Court of Appeal dated October 30, 2015.&Appeal dated October 30, 2015.»

He said, «In view of our belief in the judiciary and avalanche of evidence against the declaration of Senator Abiola Ajimobi as the duly elected governor in the April 11, 2015 governorship election in the state, Senator Rasheed Ladoja, the gubernatorial candidate of Accord after wide consultations, has resolved to appeal the judgment of Justice Muhammed Mayaki - led tribunal at the Court of AppeaIn view of our belief in the judiciary and avalanche of evidence against the declaration of Senator Abiola Ajimobi as the duly elected governor in the April 11, 2015 governorship election in the state, Senator Rasheed Ladoja, the gubernatorial candidate of Accord after wide consultations, has resolved to appeal the judgment of Justice Muhammed Mayaki - led tribunal at the Court of Appeain the judiciary and avalanche of evidence against the declaration of Senator Abiola Ajimobi as the duly elected governor in the April 11, 2015 governorship election in the state, Senator Rasheed Ladoja, the gubernatorial candidate of Accord after wide consultations, has resolved to appeal the judgment of Justice Muhammed Mayaki - led tribunal at the Court of Appeain the April 11, 2015 governorship election in the state, Senator Rasheed Ladoja, the gubernatorial candidate of Accord after wide consultations, has resolved to appeal the judgment of Justice Muhammed Mayaki - led tribunal at the Court of Appeain the state, Senator Rasheed Ladoja, the gubernatorial candidate of Accord after wide consultations, has resolved to appeal the judgment of Justice Muhammed Mayaki - led tribunal at the Court of Aappeal the judgment of Justice Muhammed Mayaki - led tribunal at the Court of AppealAppeal.

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear Nassau County's appeal of a federal court ruling upholding a $ 43 million judgment won by two men who — after spending years in prison — were exonerated in the 1984 rape and murder of a Lynbrook teenager.

In dismissing the applicant's contention that the ongoing investigation by the EFCC should have been concluded, Justice Tsoho cited a judgment of the Court of Appeal in holding that the law did not limit the time within which the agency must conclude criminal investigationIn dismissing the applicant's contention that the ongoing investigation by the EFCC should have been concluded, Justice Tsoho cited a judgment of the Court of Appeal in holding that the law did not limit the time within which the agency must conclude criminal investigationin holding that the law did not limit the time within which the agency must conclude criminal investigations.