Sentences with phrase «appeal judgment ordering»

Nick Holmes introduces the «Free Legal Web» initiative and David Banisar comments on a «bold» Court of Appeal judgment ordering the publication of certain documents in criminal proceedings.

Not exact matches

Like the Franciscan also it protests against the ecclesiastical order, a protest which appeals to the New Testament witness to Jesus Christ in judgment against the authority of the ecclesiastical tradition.

In an appeal he filed through his team of lawyers headed by J.B Daudu, SAN, Saraki prayed for «An order staying further proceedings in Charge No: CCT / ABJ / 01 / 2015 between Federal Republic of Nigeria vs Dr. Olubukola Abubakar Saraki fixed for hearing on November 5 and 6, 2015 pending the determination of the appeal pending before the Supreme Court against the judgment of the Court of Appeal dated October 30, 2015.&appeal he filed through his team of lawyers headed by J.B Daudu, SAN, Saraki prayed for «An order staying further proceedings in Charge No: CCT / ABJ / 01 / 2015 between Federal Republic of Nigeria vs Dr. Olubukola Abubakar Saraki fixed for hearing on November 5 and 6, 2015 pending the determination of the appeal pending before the Supreme Court against the judgment of the Court of Appeal dated October 30, 2015.&appeal pending before the Supreme Court against the judgment of the Court of Appeal dated October 30, 2015.&Appeal dated October 30, 2015.»

«Governor Wike sought an order of the court of appeal allowing his appeal and an order of the court setting aside the judgment / decision of the Rivers state governorship election tribunal.

Describing Fayose as being «the least qualified to be Ekiti governor» when he was chosen as the party candidate, Ogundipe insisted that Fayose, Eddy Olafeso and others at the meeting were in contempt of the subsisting judgment and orders of the Court of Appeal, Port Harcourt Division and the Federal High Court, Lagos.

«If the proposed appeal does proceed we understand that it will be robustly defended by Laura in order to vindicate the humane, carefully considered and entirely lawful judgment of Mr Justice Colton.

On Monday 20th November 2017, the Court of Appeal sitting in Abuja delivered a judgment in which it ordered INEC to conduct the rerun election within 90 days of the judgment.

«Our legal department has asked us to go ahead and obey the Court of Appeal order against the Federal High court judgment.

On Monday, November 20, 2017, the Court of Appeal sitting in Abuja delivered judgment in favour of Umeh, ordering INEC to conduct the rerun election within 90 days of the judgment, excluding the PDP from contesting in the rerun.

The development is as a result of the May 4, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeal, Lagos Division, dismantling the restraining orders of the Lagos Division of the Federal High Court earlier obtained by the federal lawmaker.

Speaking with our correspondent on Thursday, the Anambra REC said its legal department had studied the judgments and asked it to go ahead with the election as ordered by the court of appeal as against the Tsoho Federal High Court judgment.

The PDP and Adonye further appealed to the Court of Appeal asking for an order setting aside the judgment of the tribunal.

The parties have been unable to agree upon any of the matters of substance, in particular on the form of and territorial extent of any injunctive relief, upon the extent of any Island Records v Tring disclosure (relevant to the election of an inquiry as to damages or an account of profits), upon whether and if so in what form there should be an order for publicity of the judgment as an enforcement measure, upon the appropriate basis and order as to costs, upon whether the Claimants» costs should be reduced by reason of the fact that for a period an exclusive licence was not registered, upon the extent of any CPR 31.22 order in relation to alleged confidential information, upon whether there should be permission to appeal and upon whether there should be a stay pending any appeal.»

Cognizant of the fact that the executive order could render any decision on CPP legality a mere advisory opinion, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals withheld its judgment for at least 60 days as this EPA review was undertaken.

The judgment takes effect from the day when it is given or made, or such later date as the court may specify (FPR 2010, r 29.15); and an appeal is against that judgment, not the order.

On the 24th January 2017, the United Kingdom Supreme Court returned the Miller judgment on appeal confirming the High Court's decision of 3rd November 2016 that a further Act of Parliament was required in order to fulfil the necessary condition for withdrawal mandated by the European Union Treaties» withdrawal clause.

Lightfoot appealed both the new trial order and the trial court's denial of its motions for judgment as a matter of law.

On Thursday 5 December the ECSC Court of Appeal handed down an order bringing much needed clarity to the Eastern Caribbean Civil Procedure Rules (the CPR) relating to leave to serve out for the purpose of enforcing foreign judgments.

Article 16 An immediate appeal against a ruling may be lodged against a judgment related to a petition for a protection order.

(3) In the case where an immediate appeal against a ruling has been lodged, and only when there is prima facie evidence showing that there are circumstances that will cause the revocation of the protection order, an appellate court may order, upon a petition, the suspension of the validity of the protection order until the judgment on the immediate appeal against a ruling has come into effect.

In reasons for judgment released today, the BC Court of Appeal overturned the order of a Master denying the defendant costs thrown away in circumstances where the plaintiff was successful in obtaining an adjournment of an impending trial.

However, a court may reduce (modify) to include any of the requirements relating to probation and community control, a legal sentence imposed by it within 60 days of its imposition; after the receipt by the court of a mandate issued by the appellate court upon affirmance of the judgment and / or sentence upon an original appeal; after receipt by the court of a certified copy of an order of the appellate court dismissing an original appeal from the judgment and / or sentence; or if further appellate review is sought in a higher court or in successively higher courts, after the highest state or federal court to which a timely appeal has been taken under authority of law, or when a petition for certiorari has been timely filed under authority of law, has written an order of affirmance or an order dismissing the appeal and / or denying certiorari.

Another law firm obtained, by summary judgment, an order for payment of its legal fees in the amount of $ 182,569.63 and an order dismissing a former client's counterclaim alleging negligence against it (2017 ONSC 3391, under appeal).

Section 21 (1) states that «an appeal lies to the appellate court from any judgment or order, whether final or interim rendered or made by a court under this act.»

Decisions of employment tribunals along with the Employment Appeal Tribunal, the First - tier Tribunal and the Upper Tribunal will be registrable in the Register of Judgments, Orders and Fines once filed for enforcement with the High Court or a county court.

The decision of the Court of Appeal in Department of Economic Policy and Development of the City of Moscow and another v Bankers Trust and another [2004] EWCA Civ 314, [2004] 4 All ER 746 raises issues of potentially far - reaching significance vis - à - vis the public nature of judgments and orders pronounced by the English courts in the context of arbitration applications.

Delivering the lead judgment in RFC2012 Plc (in liquidation)(formerly The Rangers Football Club Plc) v Advocate General for Scotland [2017] UKSC 45, Lord Hodge said: «The central issue in this appeal is whether it is necessary that the employee himself or herself should receive, or at least be entitled to receive, the remuneration for his or her work in order for that reward to amount to taxable emoluments.»

This appeal was brought by Rovi against a judgment and consequential revocation order made by Mr John Baldwin QC on 14 July 2014 (Rovi Solutions Corporation & Another v Virgin Media Ltd & Others [2014] EWHC 2301 (Pat)-RRB- in respect of European Patent (UK) 1,327,209, which the judge ruled was invalid due to the lack of an inventive step.

A Notice of Appeal must be filed within thirty days of the entry of the order or judgment from which the appeal is Appeal must be filed within thirty days of the entry of the order or judgment from which the appeal is appeal is taken.

The record means the aggregate of papers relating to an appeal proper (including the pleadings, proceedings, evidence, judgments and order granting leave to appeal) to be laid before Her Majesty in council on the hearing of the appeal.

The judgment, handed down by Lord Justice May in the Court of Appeal last week (19 February), ruled that an earlier judgment ordering CBUK to pay # 4.2 m in damages to Wembley Stadium's main contractor Multiplex should be reduced to # 1.8 m.

[1] This appeal is from the judgment of Justice Edward P. Belobaba dismissing the appellant's application for an order that the respondents disclose the identities of confidential sources for a story written by the respondent Sinclair Stewart and published by the respondent the Globe and Mail Inc..

Fish and Cromwell J.J., dissenting, would have affirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeal ordering a new trial.»

But the defendant later had reason to smile when an appeals court vacated the judgment in his case and ordered a new trial after Wilson's actions came to light.

In one of the cases before the appeal court, businessman Robert Hryniak is challenging Superior Court Justice Duncan Grace's summary judgment ruling ordering him to pay investors $ 2 million in a civil fraud case.

The parties, after the trial judge made his order for judgment, stipulated that the defendants (without waiving their rights of appeal) would accept the third alternative but would reduce to ten the number of shares of Sales Leadership to be transferred to O'Hara.

The Court of Appeal recently handed down judgment in Excalibur Ventures v Texas Keystone Inc [2016] EWCA Civ 3436 (Comm), which is an important case on the liability of third - party litigation funders for a non-party costs order under CPR 46.2.

At the 2011 retrial, ordered by the Court of Appeal, Vos J, citing 19th and 20th century judgments, concluded that «in the peculiar, some might say extraordinary circumstances of this case», Martin «knew and approved» of the 2004 will, «wanted Anne to benefit under it», «validly directed her to sign it on his behalf» and that it was «valid, even though it was signed by its beneficiary on behalf of the testator».

Court of Appeal's jurisdiction to reconsider its own judgment prior to issuance of its order — Eftimovski v. Faris, 2006), 38 R.P.R. (4th) 49 (Ont.

Key decision before the Eastern Caribbean Court of Appeal On Thursday 5 December the ECSC Court of Appeal handed down an order bringing much needed clarity to the Eastern Caribbean Civil Procedure Rules (the CPR) relating to leave to serve out for the purpose of enforcing foreign judgments.

The appeal from that order was therefore properly «in» the Court of Appeals, and the case is now properly before this Court on the writ of certiorari before judgment.

[47] While the judgment of the Court of Appeal in that case was set aside and a new trial ordered -LSB-[1952] 1 D.L.R. 82] there is nothing said in the judgments delivered in this Court to throw any doubt on the accuracy of the statement quoted.

Generally speaking, in order to file an appeal with the Montana Supreme Court, you have to have a final judgment or order from the district court.

An appeal is a proceeding to review a judgment or order of a lower court based upon the record made before the lower court...

AB 69 Revises provisions governing the recycling of paper and paper products by courts; revises provisions governing the duties of court clerks and justices of the peace in relation to the fees charged by those officials; revises provisions governing the collection and reporting of certain statistical information; changes the term «county clerk» to «clerk of the court» in certain statutes; removes provisions requiring courts provide the Court Administrator certain orders relating to bail forfeitures; repeals provisions governing an offer of judgment; repeals the requirement that the Nevada Supreme Court decide an appeal from judgment imposing the death penalty within a certain period; repeals provisions governing the selection of panels of jurors by boards of county commissioners; revises various other provisions relating to court administration.

The moving party, Metro Ontario Inc. («Metro»), sought leave to appeal the Order of the Honourable Justice Akhtar, dismissing its summary judgment motion.

Among other things: successfully obtaining the continuation of a US $ 2 billion freezing order under s. 25 of the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 in support of Russian proceedings; and successfully acting on an ex parte appeal against a Judge's refusal to grant a Chabra freezing order — the Order was granted by the Court of Appeal and continued on the return date (with Stephen Smith QC and Ben Griffiorder under s. 25 of the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 in support of Russian proceedings; and successfully acting on an ex parte appeal against a Judge's refusal to grant a Chabra freezing order — the Order was granted by the Court of Appeal and continued on the return date (with Stephen Smith QC and Ben Griffappeal against a Judge's refusal to grant a Chabra freezing order — the Order was granted by the Court of Appeal and continued on the return date (with Stephen Smith QC and Ben Griffiorder — the Order was granted by the Court of Appeal and continued on the return date (with Stephen Smith QC and Ben GriffiOrder was granted by the Court of Appeal and continued on the return date (with Stephen Smith QC and Ben GriffAppeal and continued on the return date (with Stephen Smith QC and Ben Griffiths).

And here, since it appears from the statement in the order of the Court of Appeal that the question whether the Syndicalism Act and its application in this case was repugnant to the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment was considered and passed upon by that court — this being a federal question constituting an appropriate ground for a review of the judgment — we conclude that this Court has acquired jurisdiction under the writ of error.

Pourghazi v Kamyab (Court of Appeal)[2015] EWCA Civ 562 Acting for the respondent to an appeal and obtaining an order that, unless the appellant paid # 950,000 (the part of the judgment which was not subject to the appeal) to the respondent, the appeal would be strucAppeal)[2015] EWCA Civ 562 Acting for the respondent to an appeal and obtaining an order that, unless the appellant paid # 950,000 (the part of the judgment which was not subject to the appeal) to the respondent, the appeal would be strucappeal and obtaining an order that, unless the appellant paid # 950,000 (the part of the judgment which was not subject to the appeal) to the respondent, the appeal would be strucappeal) to the respondent, the appeal would be strucappeal would be struck out.

The Ontario Court of Appeal recently released its endorsement in Alfred Wegener Institute v. ALCI Aviation Ltd., 2014 ONCA 398, upholding an order from the application judge that a German arbitral award be recognized and enforced in Ontario as if it were a judgment or order of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.