Sentences with phrase «appeal panel accepted»

In allowing the appeal and setting aside the order of the motions judge, a unanimous Court of Appeal panel accepted the appellant's argument that Rule 15.02 (4), a rule designed to terminate proceedings where a named plaintiff has not authorized commencement, had no application.

Thirdly, the Employment Judge had found that it was implicit that by upholding the original decision, the appeal panel accepted not only the decision made by the capability hearing panel but also its reasons.

Not exact matches

Last week, former State Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver (D - Lower Manhattan) escaped justice when a federal appeals panel overturned his conviction for accepting bribes and money - laundering.

If the Appeal Board accepts the decision of the Judicial Panel, whether or not it reduces the sanction, the matter shall be deemed final.

Simler J accepted that the EJ had drawn a permissible inference that the appeal panel dismissed the appeal on the same grounds and for the same reasons as those identified by the dismissing panel.

Both the appeal panel and the Administrative Court (Dobbs J) in Eisai accepted NICE's submissions that it was not the role of consultees to «quality assure» NICE's work: it was for NICE as the decision - maker to obtain and ensure the quality of the material upon which it relied.

As reported in the written decision of the Law Society Hearing Panel (which decision is under appeal by the applicant), the applicant threatened to sue the other board members for defamation after he was removed as President of the condo corporation and a notice of his removal was posted; circulated a letter (under a false name) on some floors within the building that falsely stated that some of the board members had previously gone bankrupt, had criminal convictions and were accepting bribes and free meals from the developer of the condominium to settle deficiencies with the developer; made a derogatory remark about some of the residents based on their ethnicity; threatened to report some of the directors to US / Canada border officials, falsely alleging that they were drug smugglers; threatened both the corporation's property manager and security services firm that their contracts with the condo corporation would be in jeopardy if they did not provide a character letter to the applicant.

The Commission will review your complaint and determine if it can accept it; The Respondent, or other party, will be notified, receive a copy of the complaint and have a chance to respond; There will be a voluntary conciliation — the Commission assigns a conciliator to try help and resolve the differences between the parties; The Commission assigns an investigator to gather information related to the complaint, consult with the parties on the results of the investigation, and assess whether there is a reasonable basis to proceed with the complaint process; If there is a reasonable basis to proceed with the complaint, the Commission will ask the parties to reach a settlement; and If the investigation does not show a reasonable basis to proceed with the complaint process, then the complaint is dismissed; The Director of the Commission may discontinue a complaint if the Director believes that the complainant has refused to accept a fair / reasonable settlement offer — this can be appealed; and Last, the matter is referred to the Human Rights panel for a hearing.

«We do not accept this submission,» a three - judge appeal court panel ruled in Ricciuto v. Somers.

The insurer argued that $ 150 should be considered reasonable because it was the rate accepted by panel attorneys; but the Appeals Court found that the definition of a reasonable fee should be based on market rates, rather than panel rates.

For the appeal it was accepted that there were express terms relating to the disciplinary process and that the contract incorporated the relevant trust disciplinary process, derived from a Department of Health Circular HC (90) 9, and by virtue of the incorporation of that process Edwards was entitled both to have disciplinary allegations considered by an independent three - person panel with a legally qualified chair and one panelist from the same clinical discipline and legal representation at the hearing.

The manual gave CAR authority to determine whether it would accept a dispute for arbitration and also provided that such determination was subject to approval by the Board of Directors, which may delegate such authority to an appeals panel.