Sentences with phrase «appeal reduced the award»

The Court of Appeal reduced the award to $ 200,000.

Not exact matches

Such awards are usually appealed and are often reduced by appeals courts.

The appeals process is likely to drag on for years, and some legal experts predict that the judgment will ultimately be overturned or the award greatly reduced.

«The Court of Arbitration for Sport (TAS) has today informed Real Madrid CF the award for partially estimating the appeal made by the club against the resolution of FIFA that imposed a penalty of prohibition of registration of players during two periods of signings, reducing it to one, the window corresponding to January 2017,» read a statement from the club.

«These revisions have been made in order to increase the appeal of the highly awarded 308 range while increasing value and specification and reducing model complexity.

The question is whether you believe the market value of the company today is below the intrinsic value of the company (this boils down to whether the current award will be upheld in the appeal, reduced or thrown out).

«Nintendo will appeal the jury's verdict and reduced damages award to the court of appeals.»

In the Court of Appeal's decision, Laskin J.A. reduced the punitive damages awarded at trial by a significant amount.

Mr. Keays» has also cross-appealed from the Ontario Court of Appeal decision reducing the $ 500,000.00 punitive damages award he received at trial to $ 100,000.00.

One case saw a $ 4.5 - million award reduced to just $ 675,000 on appeal, while another lost out on a $ 2.5 - million jury award when the appeal court reversed the decision.

As a result, the Court of Appeal reduced the amount of damages awarded to Mr. Pirani.

Following an appeal by Home Hardware the aggravated damages were set aside and the punitive damages were reduced to $ 75,000 however, the notice award and defamation damages in the amount of $ 60,000 were upheld.

In reducing the original punitive damages award, the Court of Appeal balanced the legitimate objective of «punishing» the employer against a requirement of proportionality based on the specific facts of the case.

But «a judge reduced the award to $ 5 million, then the federal appeals court in Richmond, Va., threw out the verdict altogether as barred by the church's First Amendment rights.»

The Court of Appeal overturned a decision by a trial judge to reduce a claimants award by 10 % for refusing to undergo cortisone injections.

The Court of Appeal for Ontario has outright denied Tess Cusipag's appeal to reduce the damages awarded in Senator Tobias Enverga's defamation suit against Cusipag and Balita superstar «investigative journalist,» Romy MaAppeal for Ontario has outright denied Tess Cusipag's appeal to reduce the damages awarded in Senator Tobias Enverga's defamation suit against Cusipag and Balita superstar «investigative journalist,» Romy Maappeal to reduce the damages awarded in Senator Tobias Enverga's defamation suit against Cusipag and Balita superstar «investigative journalist,» Romy Marquez.

On appeal the Court of Appeals awarded Husband 55 % of the entire marital estate and reduced the amount he owed Wife to $ 275,760.43.

The BC Court of Appeal agreed and reduced the award by almost $ 45,000.

The Plaintiff was awarded over $ 100,000 for future care, however this amount was reduced by about 40 % by the British Columbia Court of Appeal, which stated that an analysis of each item claimed for future care must be conducted

The California 4th District Court of Appeal had previously reduced the award from $ 369 million to $ 82.6 million.

In our October 22, 2010 post, we reported on the New York Court of Appeals» decision in Flemming v. Barnwell Nursing, which denied awarding attorney's fees to a class action settlement objector whose efforts helped reduce requested class counsel fees of $ 448,000 down to $ 425,000 in a $ 950,000 settlement.

Having a plan to funnel money into your Court of Appeals race go into effect the exact same day that you decide to hold a hearing on whether to reduce a jury award.

Accordingly, I would allow Wal - Mart's appeal on punitive damages and reduce the award from $ 1,000,000 to $ 100,000.

Accordingly, I would allow Pinnock's appeal on punitive damages and reduce the jury's award from $ 150,000 to $ 10,000.

Drawing on Whiten v. Pilot Insurance Co., 2002 SCC 18, if an award of punitive damages, together with the compensatory damages awarded, «produces a total sum that is so «inordinately large» that it exceeds what is «rationally» required to punish the defendant, it will be reduced or set aside on appeal».

The judge adopted this approach and the wife was awarded the former matrimonial home and a lump sum of # 2.2 m. On appeal, the husband argued that the lump sum payment should be reduced to # 1.5 m.

[62] Putting the test the other way around, «if the award of punitive damages when added to compensatory damages, produces a total sum that is so «inordinately large» that it exceeds what is «rationally» required to punish the defendant, it will be reduced or set aside on appeal,»: see Whiten, at para. 109.

The sole dissenter, D.C. Court of Appeals Judge Brett Kavanaugh, would have found Olivia liable but would have reduced the punitive damages award from $ 10 million to $ 20,000.

In the class actions Jeffery v. London Life Insurance Co. and McKittrick v. Great - West Life Assurance Co., the appeal court reduced the award given by a trial judge to $ 220 million, from $ 390 million.

However, on appeal in October 2015, the Court set aside the contempt finding as there was no outstanding order at the time to be the subject of contempt, ordered another access review to be held by February 2016, and reduced the costs award to $ 200,000.

Virtually every award is being reduced on appeal, General Patent's Poltorak said.

Initially, the court awarded 80 % of damages, however, as a result of the appeal, the company was able to reduce the amount to 40 %.

An award of more than $ 174,000 to a broker who sued his franchiser over a dispute involving «exclusive territory» has been reduced to $ 36,000 by the Ontario Court of Appeal.