In June, for example, the court ordered the defendants to provide information about its customers within 10 days of an Ontario Court of
Appeal ruling in the case.
Not exact matches
Irish Finance Minister Michael Noonan told CNBC Tuesday that the country would
appeal to the
ruling, restating Ireland's position that the «full amount of tax was paid
in this
case and no state aid was provided.»
A judge
ruled in favor of the House
in 2016, but an
appeal filed by the Obama administration allowed the CSR payments to continue as the
case moved its way through the courts.
Separately on Tuesday, a judge for the U.S. Federal Court of
Appeals for the Fourth Circuit,
ruled narrowly
in favor of the subsidies
in a
case called David King.
As for the
ruling itself,
in most
cases an arbitration can not be
appealed.
In June 2016, the Supreme Court split 4 - 4 in the case, leaving in place an appeals court ruling in favor of the states
In June 2016, the Supreme Court split 4 - 4
in the case, leaving in place an appeals court ruling in favor of the states
in the
case, leaving
in place an appeals court ruling in favor of the states
in place an
appeals court
ruling in favor of the states
in favor of the states..
While the Supreme Court
in October 2015 declined to review the
case, the justices
in January agreed to review a similar one, Salman's
case,
in which a federal
appeals court
in California had issued a potentially conflicting
ruling.
In December, the Yukon appeal court sided with the Ross River Dena Council that existing free - entry staking rules conflicted with the constitutional duty to consult aboriginal groups with outstanding land claims, in this case to an area known as the Kask
In December, the Yukon
appeal court sided with the Ross River Dena Council that existing free - entry staking
rules conflicted with the constitutional duty to consult aboriginal groups with outstanding land claims,
in this case to an area known as the Kask
in this
case to an area known as the Kaska.
Uber would still be able to
appeal Chen's class certification
ruling after the entire
case is litigated
in the lower court.
In a recent court
case, the 9th Circuit Court of
Appeals ruled that the Department of Justice is prohibited from using federal funds to prosecute businesses who operate within state laws regarding medical marijuana.
An Ontario Court of
Appeal justice has warned against «summary judgment at all costs»
in her dissent of a
ruling on the application of the doctrine of emergency
in a personal injury
case.
Last week, AARP filed an
appeal of the Fifth Circuit
ruling, while New York, Oregon and California filed a motion asking the court for permission to rehear the
case in front of the full panel of judges — known as an en banc review.
«The Movants have had ample opportunity to intervene
in the multiple
cases challenging the so - called «Fiduciary
Rule»
in district courts around the country,
in appeals in two other circuits courts, and
in this
appeal, which was decided by this Court more than a month ago,» the filing said.
She then
appealed her
case to the Washington Supreme Court, which
ruled 9 — 0 against her
in February 2017.
(Most recently, the D.C. Court of
Appeals issued an important but nuanced
ruling in what Religion Clause's Howard Friedman calls the government's test
case, Gilardi v. HHS.)
The resulting court
case (Hudnut v. the American Booksellers Association) went as far as the U.S. Court of
Appeals, which
ruled in favor of the booksellers.
A second blow to the revolving door system came
in 1966 when the Federal Court of
Appeals ruled,
in effect,
in the Driver and Easter
cases, that public intoxication per se is not a crime.
However, Ossewaarde has
appealed his
case, and now, Russia's Supreme Court could issue a
ruling in the coming weeks.
The Court of
Appeals for this Circuit
in the Gaidry
case took note of these two
cases, but held them not reconcilable with the later
ruling of the United States Supreme Court
in Baglin v. Cusenier, 221 U. S. 680 [1 T. M. Rep. 147], wherein it was held that the fact that the primary meaning of the word «Chartreuse» was geographical did not prevent the acquisition of the exclusive right to its use as the designation of a liqueur made by the monks of the Monastery of La Grande Chartreuse.
Following the denial of USC's
appeal of the NCAA
ruling in the SC football program's illegal benefits
case, the BCS has taken an unprecedented strike against a sanctioned team and moved to formally strip the Trojans of their 2004 college football national championship title.
Fifa initially
ruled on the
case in January, but the
appeals meant both clubs could sign players this summer.
However, on Tuesday, France's highest court for judicial matters, the Court of Cassation,
ruled an undercover police officer's actions
in the
case had been unlawful, and ordered the Paris Court of
Appeal to look again at the investigation's validity.
The key here,
in both
cases, is that the presiding officer is required to enforce the
rules as they currently exist, but any decision they make can be
appealed to the whole Senate.
Initially scheduled to report to prison on July 1, Silver's
appeal has gained some ground
in recent weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court
ruled in the
case of ex-Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell that narrowed the definition of an official quid pro quo
in public corruption
cases.
Polling showing 81 % of public support assisted dying: http://humanism.org.uk/2012/09/07/news-1108/ Previous BHA news article — «L' waives right to anonymity
in assisted dying court
case: http://humanism.org.uk/2013/04/18/paul-lamb-l-waives-right-to-anonymity-
in-assisted-dying-court-
case/ Previous BHA news article — Court of
Appeal allows «L' to join Tony Nicklinson Claim: http://humanism.org.uk/2013/03/20/court-of-
appeal-allows-l-to-join-tony-nicklinson-claim/ Previous BHA news article — New
case to test
rules on assisted dying
in UK: http://humanism.org.uk/2011/08/19/news-873/ The BHA's campaign on Assisted Dying: http://humanism.org.uk/campaigns/public-ethical-issues/assisted-dying/
The Padilla
case in 2005 did give rise to a precedent
in the United States Court of
Appeals for the 4th Circuit that supports the practice, although a subsequent
ruling in the Al - Marri
case arguably muddied the waters.
Giving the lead judgement, master of the rolls Lord Dyson found the
rules governing the
appeals process under fast - track were «systemically unfair and unjust» because «the time limits are so tight as to make it impossible for there to be a fair hearing of
appeals in a significant number of
cases».
In a case that could have wide - ranging national significance for gay rights, a federal appeals court in New York ruled that a landmark civil rights law bars employers from discriminating against their workers based on sexual orientatio
In a
case that could have wide - ranging national significance for gay rights, a federal
appeals court
in New York ruled that a landmark civil rights law bars employers from discriminating against their workers based on sexual orientatio
in New York
ruled that a landmark civil rights law bars employers from discriminating against their workers based on sexual orientation.
The Supreme Court's
ruling in McDonnell's
case set a precedent that could help others accused of public corruption, including Sen. Robert Menendez (D - N.J.), who is awaiting an
appeals court
ruling in a corruption
case; and former New York State Assembly speaker Sheldon Silver (D), who is aiming to overturn his corruption conviction.
Skelos is the second former legislative leader to win his
case on
appeal in the past two months, after a U.S. Supreme Court
ruling revised the laws under which they were convicted.
The New York Court of
Appeals denied leave to
appeal in two
cases over chimpanzees being held
in cages by owners upstate, which leaves the lower appellate court's
ruling in place.
NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio explained why he has refused to comment on the blockbuster
appeals court
ruling in favor of ex-Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, claiming he hasn't «paid attention» to the state's biggest political corruption
case in decades.
This being the
case, we must also recognize the fact that
in most countries on the Continent the lever of our revolution must be force; it is force to which we must some day
appeal in order to erect the
rule of labor.
Silver's successful
appeal was based on a 2016 US Supreme Court
ruling that reversed the conviction of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell and limited the definition of «official act»
in a corruption
case.
Schneiderman and 17 other state attorneys general on Aug. 2 won the right to intervene
in the
case in a
ruling by the D.C. Circuit of the U.S. Court of
Appeals.
In its decision regarding Silver's case, the appeals court ruled in 2017 that the definition of official corruption provided to the jurors differed from the one used by the U.S. Supreme Court when it overturned the corruption conviction of former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell, and so it was possible the jury could have ruled differently had it been instructed on the updated definition of the la
In its decision regarding Silver's
case, the
appeals court
ruled in 2017 that the definition of official corruption provided to the jurors differed from the one used by the U.S. Supreme Court when it overturned the corruption conviction of former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell, and so it was possible the jury could have ruled differently had it been instructed on the updated definition of the la
in 2017 that the definition of official corruption provided to the jurors differed from the one used by the U.S. Supreme Court when it overturned the corruption conviction of former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell, and so it was possible the jury could have
ruled differently had it been instructed on the updated definition of the law.
After the 2nd Circuit
ruled last week, the three - judge panel hearing the
appeal in the Skelos
case asked lawyers to submit additional legal arguments
in light of the Silver decision.
The Court of
Appeals eventually
ruled in Soares» favor but even then - Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman noted the
case involved a «personal issue back and forth» between Carter and Soares.
The decision from the Second Circuit Court of
Appeals was sparked by the U.S. Supreme Court's decision
in the
case of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, whose conviction was overturned by the nation's highest court
in a
ruling that narrowed the definition of the types of official acts that could be considered as part of quid pro quo arrangements.
The extent to which similar
cases come up
in the Court of
Appeals could depend on what a Trump Supreme Court chooses to
rule on.
Malliotakis, who is still
in Albany while the Legislature wrangles over the state budget, said she plans to
appeal Minardo's
ruling, which she said «was made on procedure and not on the merit of the
case.»
A judge
ruled in the city's favor
in the
case earlier this month, but Malliotakis has said she plans to
appeal the
ruling.
In the
case of the former New York State Assembly speaker, a federal
appeals court cited a 2016 Supreme Court
ruling redefining illegal actions by public officials.
WAMC's Dr. Alan Chartok discusses the Supreme Court's decision not to hear the Trump Administration's
appeal of a Federal Judge's
ruling on DACA and the political clout of labor unions being challenged
in the Mark Janus Supreme Court
case that began Monday.
The schools were supposed to get around 5.5 billion more dollars
in education aid, after the Court of
Appeals ruled in 2006
in the Campaign for Fiscal Equity
case.
The state's Court of
Appeals later
ruled the death penalty unconstitutional
in the form
in which it was written (
in the
case of People v. LaValle), and the State Legislature has not passed a bill to restore it
in a new form.
A recent
appeals court
ruling in a
case that grew out of PSEG Long Island's expansion of an electrical substation on Old Stone Highway
in Amagansett, represents a mixed decision for East Hampton Town, which had sought to hold the utility provider to local zoning laws that would have required planning board review of the project.
Saratoga County district attorney Charles B. Andrus, the county's government
appeal agent, recently asked the district exemption board whether exceptions could be made to this
rule in cases of obvious hardship.
Both
appeals court
rulings made clear that overturning the convictions did not mean innocents had been brought to the slaughter, only that while their
cases were moving through the justice system, the proof needed
in public corruption
cases changed.
The Second Circuit court did not
rule in Smith's
case, nor
in that of convicted ex-Queens Republican Vice-Chair Vincent Tabone, who also argued an
appeal before the panel Thursday.