Sentences with phrase «appeals board within»

Not exact matches

The Electoral Board «s chairwoman, County Clerk Linda Hess, said those objecting to the board «s decision could appeal to the Lake County Circuit Court within 10 Board «s chairwoman, County Clerk Linda Hess, said those objecting to the board «s decision could appeal to the Lake County Circuit Court within 10 board «s decision could appeal to the Lake County Circuit Court within 10 days.

NOTE, each independent office within Erie County Government (Board of Elections, Clerk, Comptroller, District Attorney, Legislature, and Sheriff), administers their own separate FOIL processes with both an internal FOIL Officer and FOIL Appeals Officer.

Any such decision adverse to the employee may be appealed by the employee pursuant to s. 120.68, provided such appeal is filed within 30 days after the decision of the district school board.

Any decision adverse to the employee may be appealed by him or her pursuant to s. 120.68, provided such appeal is filed within 30 days after the decision of the district school board.

A direct hearing conducted by the district school board within 60 days after receipt of the written appeal.

If the applicant team determines that the districts denial was unfounded, the team may appeal to the State Board of Education within 30 days of the district's decision.

For adverse actions over which the Merit Systems Protection Board has jurisdiction: Initiate an appeal to the MSPB within 30 days of the appealable adverse action as defined in 5 CFR.

Upon receipt of official notification of suspension, the defendant may within 30 days appeal in writing to the Board of Directors.

Letters for appeal will be responded to within two weeks, and a review of the application will be completed within two months by the Board of Directors, excluding the President, following the same guidelines and anonymous scoring procedure as the Application Review Committee.

Within a few weeks after the hearing, the property owner will get a written report on whether the appeal board reduced the valuation, and by what amount.

Hyatt Regency Danang Resort and Spa is a five - star property located on beautiful Nuoc Non Beach within view of the Marble Mountains and just 15 minutes from Da Nang International Airport.This is an idyllic spot that will appeal to beach - lovers and families.Accommodation at Hyatt Regency Danang Resort and Spa consists of Standard Rooms; Regency Club; Suites; Villas, and Residences and each type features individually controlled air conditioning, complimentary coffee and tea - making facilities, IDD telephone with voice mail, complimentary free bottled drinking water replenished daily, free daily newspaper, iron and ironing board, en - suite bathroom with hair dryer, shower and bathtub, along with brand - name toiletries, a mini-bar, refrigerator, a safety deposit box, satellite TV with international channels, electronic key card, and quality bedding, and foam pillows.

Inter partes review (IPR) is a procedure within the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) which authorizes a board (namely, the Patent Trial and Appeals board) to reconsider and cancel an already - issued patent claim.

He has appeared in a numerous appeals and proceedings before administrative boards within the USPTO and in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Cappeals and proceedings before administrative boards within the USPTO and in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal CAppeals for the Federal Circuit.

The Court affirmed the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, holding that the USPTO acted within its authority in promulgating rules requiring the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to...

AB 69 Revises provisions governing the recycling of paper and paper products by courts; revises provisions governing the duties of court clerks and justices of the peace in relation to the fees charged by those officials; revises provisions governing the collection and reporting of certain statistical information; changes the term «county clerk» to «clerk of the court» in certain statutes; removes provisions requiring courts provide the Court Administrator certain orders relating to bail forfeitures; repeals provisions governing an offer of judgment; repeals the requirement that the Nevada Supreme Court decide an appeal from judgment imposing the death penalty within a certain period; repeals provisions governing the selection of panels of jurors by boards of county commissioners; revises various other provisions relating to court administration.

The AIA provides that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board («PTAB») must reach a final determination within 12 months after institution of review proceedings, with a six month extension available for good cause.

Relying on the advice of the Corporation's legal counsel, the Board proposed amending its rules to «broaden the definition of «single family» accepted by the Ontario Court of Appeal, while at the same time, making it clear that multiple, unrelated, transient tenants did not fall within the expanded definition» and to grandfather all existing occupancies that did not fall within that broader definition.

As reported in the written decision of the Law Society Hearing Panel (which decision is under appeal by the applicant), the applicant threatened to sue the other board members for defamation after he was removed as President of the condo corporation and a notice of his removal was posted; circulated a letter (under a false name) on some floors within the building that falsely stated that some of the board members had previously gone bankrupt, had criminal convictions and were accepting bribes and free meals from the developer of the condominium to settle deficiencies with the developer; made a derogatory remark about some of the residents based on their ethnicity; threatened to report some of the directors to US / Canada border officials, falsely alleging that they were drug smugglers; threatened both the corporation's property manager and security services firm that their contracts with the condo corporation would be in jeopardy if they did not provide a character letter to the applicant.

You may appeal this decision within 30 days of receiving the decision letter to the Board of Referees.

Visit our attorney bios to read about our experience within the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

The Court affirmed the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, holding that the USPTO acted within its authority in promulgating rules requiring the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to construe patent claims in inter partes review proceedings under the «broadest reasonable interpretation» (or «BRI») standard.

SAS appealed the PTAB decision to the Federal Circuit, arguing that the PTAB improperly based its decision on a claim interpretation different from the one adopted in its decision to institute, and on the grounds that the Board was required to address all challenged claims under 35 U.S.C. § 318 (a), As discussed previously, the Federal Circuit ruled that the PTAB erred in relying on a new claim construction with providing adequate notice to the patent owner.But the Federal Circuit ruled that the Board acted within its authority to omit some challenged claims from the final written decision.

At the hearing, the SDAB permits the development officer to provide reasons, and ultimately dismisses the Applicant's appeal, finding ``... the noise and potential nuisance generated by social gatherings... is not a planning consideration that is within the purview of the Board.»

(vii) The decision of Consob's Board may be challenged by the defendant before the Courts of Appeal within 30 days from the date thereof (or 60 days if the defendant is based abroad).

(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the appeal tribunal may determine any matter that is relevant to the action and within the Board's jurisdiction under this Act, including determining whether

(3) A decision of the Chief Electoral Officer to discipline an employee under subsection (1) may be appealed by the employee, within 14 days after the decision has been communicated to him or her, to the Public Service Grievance Board continued under the Public Service of Ontario Act, 2006.

Such an appeal must be filed with bar counsel's office and served upon the chair of the appropriate disciplinary board within 20 days of receipt of the decision by filing and serving a petition, together with the record of the matter being appealed.

In the 2008 case, the Federal Court of Appeal overturned a decision of the Copyright Board of Canada to apply a blank media levy to digital devices such as iPods and other MP3 players on the basis that they were embedded memory devices and therefore did not fall within the definition of «audio recording media».

As I reported before in response to a question from the honourable senator, we are combining several tribunals and boards of appeal within HRSDC into one organizational structure.

Unless the board receives a written appeal within fifteen (15) working days after the citation is served, the citation becomes a final order of the Registrar.

If either the Grievance Committee or the arbitration panel determines that because of the amount involved or the legal complexity of the dispute the dispute should not be arbitrated, the arbitration shall automatically terminate unless either of the parties to the dispute appeals the decision to terminate the proceedings to the Board of Directors within twenty (20) days of the date of notice that the Grievance Committee or the arbitration panel declined to continue the proceeding.

Should any party be aggrieved by a decision of the Board, then within three months after the decision of the Board the aggrieved party may appeal against the decision of the Board to the Supreme Court.

If an IPR trial is instituted, the Patent Office's Patent Trial and Appeal Board will make a final decision on the patent's validity within one year.