Sentences with phrase «appeals in a case involving»

Successfully defended the County of Westchester before the Southern District of New York and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in a case involving Constitutional claims arising from the criminal arrest and «Perp Walk» of correction officers.

He successfully defended the County of Westchester before the Southern District of New York and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in a case involving Constitutional claims arising from the criminal arrest and «Perp Walk» of correction officers (Caldarola v. County of Westchester).

On June 15, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed an appeal in a case involving an Alberta worker who was fired by a mining company after testing positive for drug use.

The trial judge awarded $ 110,077.56 pursuant to a contractual fees clause, an order affirmed on appeal in a case involving basically two parties.

Not exact matches

Despite the fact that at least five of the judges involved in the two appeal court judgements were originally appointed to lower courts by Brian Mulroney's Conservative government, Harper insisted: «It was the government that decided to put the judges on the bench, the government that decided not to appeal, the government that decided to lose the case and the government that decided not to come back to Parliament.

But other courts in that Court of Appeal's jurisdiction would be required to use it when judging future cases involving Uber driver classification.

Non-judicial foreclosures are generally faster and easier for lenders to execute than the judicial process, which involves a court, along with lawsuits and appeals in some cases.

ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims, stated that the ACCC believed «that there was sufficient evidence for the Court to find that Cussons had entered into an understanding» and that the appeal will allow the Full Court to «consider whether the trial judge should have inferred an understanding involving Cussons based on the uncontested evidence in this case.»

Former state Assemblyman William Boyland Jr. has asked a federal appeals panel to set him free because last year's Supreme Court decision narrowed the reach of federal anti-corruption laws in a case involving former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell.

The removal of independent appeal panels are against natural justice and are likely to involve headteachers in expensive court cases.

Mr. Lally's past practice has included successfully representing President George W. Bush before the Miami - Dade and Orange County Boards of Election at the 2000 Florida Recounts; handling numerous complex corporate reorganizations involving multi-jurisdictional assets; recovering priceless stolen art from an international auction house; restructuring of clients» business affairs to reduce their tax and liability exposure; successfully litigating major elections cases and appeals; representing media groups in domestic and international litigation; handling complex domestic relations, divorce, and custody matters; serving as general counsel to numerous corporations in the health care, media, manufacturing, and hospitality industries; and representing parties in multi-national litigation.

The Court of Appeals eventually ruled in Soares» favor but even then - Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman noted the case involved a «personal issue back and forth» between Carter and Soares.

Albany an appeals court will hear arguments in a case involving the ban on fracking that was passed by the town of Dryden.

Another case involved Mr Drabkin as Zoning Board of Appeals chairman allowing a Use Variance when throughout the process he kept repeating (it's in the minutes!)

«I have no doubt that the only reason I am involved in this case, that I was part of this investigation, is to make it more politically appealing and to further Eric Schneiderman's partisan agenda,» Mr. Ortt said.

On the question of when Silver's motion to be given bail pending appeal will be heard, disgraced former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell has once again found his name being tossed around in corruption case involving a former high - profile New York elected official.

The Supreme Court is also likely to consider one of several cases involving conceal carry rights in the future because of conflicting rulings from intermediate courts of appeal, Donohue said.

Recent examples include the appeal for dozens of forensic science students to assist in the case involving the missing women in British Columbia, as well as the Chandra Levy case in the United States.

Biotech companies got a break today when a U.S. appeals court handed down a long - awaited ruling on gene patents in a case prompted by a suit involving Myriad Genetics of Salt Lake City.

In fact, Mandy's undeniable appeal has even been known to elicit reckless acts of hormonal abandon among her peers; case in point: last year's tragic events, involving her loyal but slightly odd bestie, Emmet (Michael Welch), and the school's resident jock, Dylan (Adam PowellIn fact, Mandy's undeniable appeal has even been known to elicit reckless acts of hormonal abandon among her peers; case in point: last year's tragic events, involving her loyal but slightly odd bestie, Emmet (Michael Welch), and the school's resident jock, Dylan (Adam Powellin point: last year's tragic events, involving her loyal but slightly odd bestie, Emmet (Michael Welch), and the school's resident jock, Dylan (Adam Powell).

And in another case that has gained widespread attention, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit last week refused to delay implementation of a voluntary student - desegregation plan involving public schools in St. Louis and its suburbs.

In its decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit parted ways with the rulings of two other federal appeals courts in similar cases, involving teachers in Boston and Kalamazoo, Mich. (See Education Week, May 18, 1983In its decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit parted ways with the rulings of two other federal appeals courts in similar cases, involving teachers in Boston and Kalamazoo, Mich. (See Education Week, May 18,Appeals for the Second Circuit parted ways with the rulings of two other federal appeals courts in similar cases, involving teachers in Boston and Kalamazoo, Mich. (See Education Week, May 18,appeals courts in similar cases, involving teachers in Boston and Kalamazoo, Mich. (See Education Week, May 18, 1983in similar cases, involving teachers in Boston and Kalamazoo, Mich. (See Education Week, May 18, 1983in Boston and Kalamazoo, Mich. (See Education Week, May 18, 1983.)

In ruling on the due - process question, the appeals court overturned a district court's decision to dismiss the case, which involved a San Antonio science teacher's claim that he was «constructively discharged «3from his position without a hearing prior to his dismissal.

In the Supreme Court brief, which addresses two consolidated cases, Tustin Unified School District v. K.M. and Poway Unified School District v. D.H., NSBA and the California School Boards Association encourage the U.S. Supreme Court to hear these cases, contending that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit misapplied the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), rather than correctly applying IDEA, to a case involving a California student with a hearing impairment.

The decision is one of several in recent months by federal appeals courts grappling with cases involving students who create Web pages ridiculing school administrators or fellow students.

Mansour v. King deals with due process in dangerous dog cases and is very clear about the standards and rules for the case, appeals and keeping of records involved.

One of the most notable legal challenges was in 2004 wherein the court denied the Idaho Power Co. appeal of a $ 17 million judgment in a stray - voltage case again involving dairy cows.

Earlier this month the Court of Appeals of Indiana ruled (via Deliberations) in an interesting case that involved a jury deciding that a plaintiff should be awarded $ 336,300 in damages, but failing to adequately communicate that to the court because of confusion about how the verdict form worked.

In Re: L - W (children)(contact order: committal)[2010] EWCA Civ 1253, [2010] All ER (D) 62 (Nov), the Court of Appeal reviewed the line of authorities on cases involving committal applications and set out a summary of the approach the court should take:

The Supreme Court of Canada will hear five appeals this week, including three criminal cases involving driving «over 80» and production of evidence; an unjust enrichment claim; and an appeal in a sexual assault case in which the Court of Appeal of Alberta had found that a trial judge had erred by relying on a stereotype about the behaviour of sexual assault viappeal in a sexual assault case in which the Court of Appeal of Alberta had found that a trial judge had erred by relying on a stereotype about the behaviour of sexual assault viAppeal of Alberta had found that a trial judge had erred by relying on a stereotype about the behaviour of sexual assault victims.

The court is also hearing a case involving solicitor - client privilege in Quebec, as well as a curious tax case where the authority increased its own assessment after a taxpayer appeal.

On appeal the Cains argued that the trial court erred by giving Instruction 10 which included language that noted «punitive damages are generally not favored and should be awarded only in cases involving egregious conduct.»

«Court Urges Review of New York Judge's Immigration Cases That Are on Appeal»: The New York Times today contains an article that begins, «In a move that immigration lawyers say is highly unusual, a federal appeals court has recommended that a Justice Department appeals board review all immigration cases still on appeal involving a judge who has been criticized as being hostile to people seeking asCases That Are on Appeal»: The New York Times today contains an article that begins, «In a move that immigration lawyers say is highly unusual, a federal appeals court has recommended that a Justice Department appeals board review all immigration cases still on appeal involving a judge who has been criticized as being hostile to people seeking aAppeal»: The New York Times today contains an article that begins, «In a move that immigration lawyers say is highly unusual, a federal appeals court has recommended that a Justice Department appeals board review all immigration cases still on appeal involving a judge who has been criticized as being hostile to people seeking ascases still on appeal involving a judge who has been criticized as being hostile to people seeking aappeal involving a judge who has been criticized as being hostile to people seeking asylum.

Recently, a reporter for WBAP Radio in Fort Worth spoke to her about the challenges involved in appealing a divorce case.

Civil cases in the criminal division include civil suspensions of driver's licenses, cases involving contested fish and wildlife fines, and appeals of decisions involving traffic and municipal ordinance violations.

Citing Walsh v. Mobil, 2008 ABCA 268 (CanLII) at 43, the Court of Appeal noted its role involved determining whether the reviewing judge's decision (in this case the decision of Topolniski J.C.Q.B.A. with respect to the Chief Commissioner's decision) chose and applied the correct standard of review.

Boucher v. Wal - Mart Canada Corp., 2014 ONCA 419 (CanLII) was a 2014 decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal which also dealt with punitive damages in an employment case involving harassment and intimidation of an employee.

There is the case of John Fries, an early tax rebellion case in 1800, who was pardoned by the president thus rendering the need for legal appeal moot, but this involved armed insurrection and is thus not analogous.

In the 1986 case of Viskides v. Derr, the Virginia Court of Appeals put to rest the «tender years presumption,» which held that a mother should be given preference in custody cases involving young childreIn the 1986 case of Viskides v. Derr, the Virginia Court of Appeals put to rest the «tender years presumption,» which held that a mother should be given preference in custody cases involving young childrein custody cases involving young children.

It's no surprise, then, that there's been so much discussion around the Ontario Court of Appeal's decision in Re: Indalex Ltd., a case Hatnay was involved in and spoke about during a session on disputes over underfunded pension plans.

Richard A. Posner, the outspoken justice on the Seventh Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals and University of Chicago law professor, has written a short piece for The New Republic, entitled «In Defence of Looseness,» in which he takes the U.S. Supreme Court to task for its decision in District of Columbia v. Heller [PDF], the case involving the second amendment to the U.S. Constitution dealing with arms and militiaIn Defence of Looseness,» in which he takes the U.S. Supreme Court to task for its decision in District of Columbia v. Heller [PDF], the case involving the second amendment to the U.S. Constitution dealing with arms and militiain which he takes the U.S. Supreme Court to task for its decision in District of Columbia v. Heller [PDF], the case involving the second amendment to the U.S. Constitution dealing with arms and militiain District of Columbia v. Heller [PDF], the case involving the second amendment to the U.S. Constitution dealing with arms and militias.

A simple search of published court decisions shows that Wikipedia is frequently cited by judges around the country, involving serious issues and the bizarre — such as a 2005 tax case before the Tennessee Court of Appeals concerning the definition of «beverage» that involved hundreds of thousands of dollars, and, just this week, a case in Federal District Court in Florida that involved the term «booty music» as played during a wet T - shirt contest.

If a law firm is retained in a case involving multiple actions, it is not obligated to represent the client in all of the actions in order to get paid for the work it performed, says the British Columbia Court of Appeal.

There appear to be about a dozen wiretapping cases that made it to the court of appeals in Maryland, and none of them involve implied consent (e.g. where it is announced prior to recording that the call may or will be recorded — prior is mandatory).

A recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision is a good one for employers when it comes to drafting employment agreement language, says a lawyer involved in the case.

Today's two appeals were companion cases involving perjury charges against two RCMP officers in the tasering death of a Polish visitor, and the SCC has now dismissed both appeals.

The decision involved the appeal of three decisions in Ontario where the rate of compensation set by the courts exceeded the Legal Aid rate in each case because the amici refused the lower Legal Aid rates.

He has prepared many briefs to the United States Courts of Appeals, including to the Sixth Circuit in a contracts / agricultural law case, to the Federal Circuit in a gray market case, and many matters to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, involving claims for allowance / rejection of registration of trademarks.

Appeared in Uzinterimpex v Standard Bank [2008] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 456, a major Court of Appeal case involving allegations of a fraudulent call by a London bank on an advance payment guarantee, constructive trust and conversion.

The case had been before the Court of Appeal three times in 1999 and 2000 and involved points on illegality, whether contributory negligence is a defence to a claim in fraud, the liability of a company director for fraud and the assessment of damages in deceit.