Not exact matches
In the Matter of the
Application of Dennis J. Malone, Petitioner (s), # 1799/2013 -
against - The Rockland County Board of Elections and Louis C. Babcock and Kristen Zebrowski Stavisky, as Commissioners and Wayne T. Ballard and «John Doe»
Respondent (s), there was extensive testimony about the roles played by Highway Department employees in collecting absentee ballots for the Highway Superintendent race.
«In the absence of a case to answer [a
respondent] is entitled to have the
application against him dismissed without more» (Richards LJ in Karoonian v CMEC).
Kleanthous v Paphitis [2011] EWHC 2287 Appeared on behalf of three
respondents at the hearing of an
application brought by a minority shareholder in the Ryman Group to continue derivative proceedings
against Theo Paphitis and others.
In a civil
application, the applicant requests the Court determine a point of law
against the
respondent.
Norwich Pharmacal and Bankers Trust disclosure
applications (including
against unusual
respondents such as email service providers and solicitors)
This case relates to whether a solicitor acting for an applicant can be found personally liable to pay the costs of the
respondent following the court's refusal to grant an
application to issue a witness summons
against the
respondent.
[1] This is an
application brought by a municipal voter, Paul Magder, under s. 9 of the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. M. 50 [MCIA]
against the
respondent, Robert Ford, the current Mayor of Toronto.
Successfully acting for liquidators in obtaining summary judgment in very substantial misfeasance proceedings, as well as orders on a committal
application,
against multiple
respondents arising out of the collapse of a large retail company
-- Instructed by Clifford Chance (as junior to Joe Smouha QC) to act for the
respondent to an
application under section 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996 challenging an LCIA award concerning a # 480 million claim for breach of contract — Instructed by Slaughter and May (as junior to David Streatfeild James QC) in an ICC arbitration involving a claim
against a German conglomerate in the industrial sector.
-- Yukos CIS Investment Limited v Yukos Hydrocarbons Investments Limited & Ors (Eastern Caribbean Court of Appeal and Commercial Court of the British Virgin Islands) Acted (led by Steven Berry QC) for the
respondents in successfully resisting
applications by Yukos CIS including to appoint a receiver over the
respondent companies and for freezing injunctions
against them.
In terms of process, EPOs can be granted by provincial court judges and justices of the peace on an
application by the victim in person or by someone on her behalf (e.g. peace officers) by telecommunication, without notice to the
respondent (PAFVA sections 2 (1), 6; Protection
Against Family Violence Regulation, Alta Reg 80/1999, sections 3, 4 (2)-RRB-.
Attorney General for Saskatchewan v. Lemare Lake Logging Ltd., 2014 SKCA 35 (35923) The
Respondent, Lemare Lake Logging Ltd. («Lemare Lake»), a secured creditor, brought an
application for the court appointment of a receiver and manager of assets, excluding livestock,
against a debtor, pursuant to s. 243 (1) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act.
Individuals who believe they have experienced adverse treatment in one of the five social areas, as a result of a Code listed ground, can file an
application with the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario if the potential
Respondent (the individual
against who the
application will be filed) is under provincial jurisdiction.
In addition, going through the Tribunal
application process no doubt educated the
respondent about service dogs and the fact that it is
against the law to discriminate
against someone for reason of a disability.
The appellants brought an action
against their next door neighbour seeking injunctive relief and damages for: (i) invasion of privacy arising from video and audio cameras which they say were trained on their property; (ii) nuisance arising from outside speakers, floodlights and the occasional errant hockey puck; (iii) trespass arising primarily from the construction of two fences; and (iv) abuse of process arising from an
application for a peace bond made by the
respondents before a justice of the peace.
Question also arises is that whether present petition filed under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is an
application for enforcement of the::: Downloaded on - 13/05/2014 23:52:29::: Kvm 81/107 ARBP259.13 jurisdictional award, interim award or is simplicitor for interim measures
against the
respondents independently.
The
respondents sought their costs of the
application on a substantial indemnity basis
against Ms. Masgras personally.
(1) A court having jurisdiction under this Part must not, at any time, make, revive or vary a child maintenance order in relation to a child on the
application of a person (the applicant)
against, or in favour of, a person (the
respondent) if an
application could properly be made, at that time, by the applicant under the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 for the
respondent to be assessed in respect of the costs of the child, or vice versa.
357 DOS 02 Matter of DOS v. Elias - failure to appear at hearing; failure to pay judgment; proper business practices; deposits; DOS fails its burden of proof; restitution; ex parte hearing may proceed upon proof of proper service;
respondent failed to fully satisfy a judgment obtained
against him without showing that he was unable to do so; a rental broker is entitled to compensation only after procuring a rental agreement between tenant and landlord; retaining part or all of the deposit without obtaining a rental agreement demonstrates untrustworthiness and incompetency; restitution may be ordered as a condition to retention of the broker's license where he has received money to which he is not entitled; unlawful for broker to operate real estate brokerage business at an address other than that which was stated on his
application; broker operated his real estate business out of an address prior to obtaining a license for that address; DOS failed to prove that
respondent commingled and converted deposits; real estate brokers license suspended for four months and an additional period of time until
respondent proves he has paid the balance of the judgment