Not exact matches
The Phoenix lander has given
scientists a close look at the
ice in one spot high in the martian
arctic, but researchers have also been surveying fresh craters across the planet for signs of frozen water.
Tags:
arctic climate climate change environment global warming
ice methane ocean ocean acidification science
scientists
Now the question is, can the real climate
scientists come forward and present the truth about global warming, or are we in for more ridiculous predictions about an
ice free
arctic by 2013 and the extinction of polar bears?
9:30 am — TCM — The Thing From Another World An team of
scientists in the
arctic discover an
ice - bound spacecraft, but when they bring the dead pilot back to their station, they discover he's carrying a bloodthirsty alien parasite.
Joe Romm has piece on
arctic sea
ice loss and the headline says
scientists are freaking out.
One factor that gets short review — aside from a recent small article in New
Scientist Magazine — is the increasing prevelance of soot in the
arctic and its effects on
ice melt.
Just recently a «
scientist» at the German hyper alarmist PIK «found out» that the (temporary) loss of sea
ice in the
arctic leads to increased ocean heat loss to the atmosphere resulting in more snow elsewhere.
Bob Tisdale says: January 10, 2011 at 3:05 pm Manfred says: «Just recently a «
scientist» at the German hyper alarmist PIK «found out» that the (temporary) loss of sea
ice in the
arctic leads to increased ocean heat loss to the atmosphere resulting in more snow elsewhere.
In Washington there was an awesome Earth Day warning from a government
scientist, Dr. Jay Murray Mitchell said, «Pollution and over-pollution unless checked could so warm the earth in 200 years as to create a greenhouse effect melting the
arctic ice cap and flooding vast areas of the world.»
Too many people (climate
scientists (non sea
ice experts), a few sea
ice experts, and alarmed AGW advocates and many in the media hype the
arctic sea
ice spiral of death (google turns up 409K mentions).
So, yes,
scientists are very much able to make a meaningful case for such data, and they do so quite lucidly in the IPCC assessments and in the NSICD's annual
arctic ice extent reports.
Bosse (Citizen
Scientist / Public), 4.1 (± 0.43), Statistical (Same as June) Just as in the two years before I calculate the value for the September - minimum of the
arctic sea
ice extent of the year n (NSIDC monthly mean for September) from the Ocean Heat Content (0... 700m depth) northward 65 ° N during JJAS of the year n - 1.
While NASA says sea
ice probably won't set any records this year, we have this horrible news: Sea
ice decline spurs the greening of the
Arctic Sea
ice decline and warming trends are changing the vegetation in nearby
arctic coastal areas, according to two University of Alaska Fairbanks
scientists.
Most
scientists make measured statements about
arctic ice.