Sentences with phrase «arctic ice shows»

Not exact matches

With many sanctuaries still showing the effects from months of arctic temperatures, ice, and record - breaking snowfalls, participants can be expected to match, if not surpass, the totals from the 2014 cleanup.

Observed decreases in arctic sea ice extent have been shown to be inconsistent with simulated internal variability, and consistent with the simulated response to human influence, but SH sea ice extent has not declined.

Yes, there's a lot going on in Marfa this weekend, including also the farmer's market, the Marfa Lights Festival Parade, the art show, the dialogues — and a performance by New York - based artist Cynthia Hopkins of This Clement World, «a musical that sails through the burning ice and myths of the high arctic.»

The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice.

And each of the next 4 to 5 years will show succesively more arctic sea ice.

Paul claims the arctic ice sheet has become thicker in the last decade, but the graph he posts shows the direct opposite.

GISP2 ice core temperatures show that the arctic was 2 degrees C warmer 6000 years ago, 2000 years ago and approximately the same temperature 1000 years ago (with the Vikings).

So you also contend that climate models show skill and can be relied upon, in addition to highlighting that increased radiative forcing from greenhouses gases is melting the arctic ice.

as you can see both show no death spiral, nor is the arctic going to be ice free this summer as opined back in 2007 by some of their ilk

Conversely, the arctic ice winter max increases slightly during that period, and temperature data for that region show a cooling.

The latest movie movie (5) shows the rapid retreat of arctic sea ice in summer 2007 and 2008.

These NASA provided images show the minimum arctic sea ice concentration in 1979, at left, and in 2003.

The second movie (2) illustrates the shrinking of arctic summer (September) sea ice, while the third movie (3) shows the variability of winter (March) sea ice.

The graph shows IPCC model runs projecting arctic sea ice loss into the future.

The catastrophic loss of sea - ice in the arctic (as shown in the graph at the right) is one of the most conspicuous signs that climate change is very real and is happening, not in a hundred or two hundred years, but NOW.

And remember, the satellite data are one small part of a vast amount of data that overwhelmingly show our planet is warming up: retreating glaciers, huge amounts of ice melting at both poles, the «death spiral» of arctic ice every year at the summer minimum over time, earlier annual starts of warm weather and later starts of cold weather, warming oceans, rising sea levels, ocean acidification, more extreme weather, changing weather patterns overall, earlier snow melts, and lower snow cover in the spring...

However, it seems to me that when you add the energy involved in the atmosphere and the energy involved in melting arctic sea ice, the surface warming trend no longer shows a pause.

A classic case in point was the discovery that field observations of the loss of arctic sea ice showed that by 2007 it had advanced to a level predicted by the mean of models of that loss as occurring in the 2100s, while that mean was used as the consensus projection in AR4.

The July Outlook for arctic sea ice extent in September 2010 shows some notable adjustments from the June Outlook, with both downward and upward revisions from last month.

The June Outlook for arctic sea ice in September 2010 shows reasonable arguments for either a modest increase or decrease in September 2010 sea ice extent compared to the last two years (5.4 million square kilometers in 2009 and 4.7 million square kilometers in 2008).

Overall, the curve shown in Figure 4 is commensurate with the notion that a thinner arctic ice cover that is more mobile can lead to greater seasonal and interannual variability, with a potential loss in predictability.

The graph above shows daily arctic sea ice extent.

Had he wished to be objective, he would have pointed out that, while satellite observations do indeed confirm that the extent of arctic sea ice has been declining over the past 30 years, the same satellite observations show that, overall, Antarctic sea ice has been expanding over the same period.

At least four key findings from these projects relating to arctic heterotrophic food web, pelagic - benthic coupling and biodiversity have emerged: (1) Contrary to a long - standing paradigm of dormant ecosystems during the long arctic winter, major food web components showed relatively high level of winter activity, well before the spring release of ice algae and subsequent phytoplankton bloom.

Show me someone who has successfully determined arctic ice extent from weather data alone.

With time we will know whether the new study validates but I do find it a bit suspicious when a study seems to show that the only areas significantly losing ice are Antarctica, Greenland and Alaska... What about the canadian high arctic, svalbard, himilayas, switzerland, patagonia....»

Below are examples of photos show the strongest and most obvious result of global warming; retreating glaciers, melting ice and shrinking snow cover occurring in the arctic region of the world.

That a simple warming trend throughout the 20th century does not characterise arctic conditions is also confirmed by records of ice cover in the four seas that lie north of Siberia (Kara, Laptev, East Siberian and Chukchi); these show clearly that ice variability in these seas is dominated by a low frequency oscillation of frequency 60 ‐ 80 years that «places a strong limitation on our ability to resolve long term trends».

Satellite data since 1978 show that annual average arctic sea ice extent has shrunk by 2.7 [2.1 to 3.3] % per decade, with larger decreases in summer of 7.4 [5.0 to 9.8] % per decade.

It is currently shown to be in very low ice concentration in a large embayment formed in the central arctic ice pack.

There is the Cryosphere data from the University of Illinois which show arctic and Antarctic ice concentration and extent (this is not Mr. Watts data, it is satellite data.

From 1978 to 1996, the average ice cover around Antarctica showed almost no trend (a slight increase 1.3 % per decade), however ice decreased by 2.9 % per decade on average over the arctic seas (1).

The BBC are showing a PIOMAS graph indicating a possible ice free arctic by 2015.

After reading Julienne Stroves blog it sems unlikely that such a huge block of ice, 30 miles by 12 miles and 85 feet thick, could be wandering round the arctic as they certainly hadnt seen any, and have commented that the satellites appears to be showing more ice than actually exists.

Much like your arguement above about trends in arctic ice since 2003, how much traction would I get suggesting that surface temperature trends in some region the size of the arctic showed a negative trend?