For 8 months of the year, reduced
arctic sea ice increases heat loss from the Arctic Ocean due to increased convection, conduction, and evaporation and radiation losses.
Not exact matches
In this new regime, with a complete absence of
sea ice and snow in the Northern Hemisphere, with rapid warming of the
arctic region due to
increased solar absorption, a jump in regional temps will occur.
Since IPCC (2001) the cryosphere has undergone significant changes, such as the substantial retreat of
arctic sea ice, especially in summer; the continued shrinking of mountain glaciers; the decrease in the extent of snow cover and seasonally frozen ground, particularly in spring; the earlier breakup of river and lake ice; and widespread thinning of antarctic ice shelves along the Amundsen Sea coast, indicating increased basal melting due to increased ocean heat fluxes in the cavities below the ice shelv
sea ice, especially in summer; the continued shrinking of mountain glaciers; the decrease in the extent of snow cover and seasonally frozen ground, particularly in spring; the earlier breakup of river and lake
ice; and widespread thinning of antarctic
ice shelves along the Amundsen
Sea coast, indicating increased basal melting due to increased ocean heat fluxes in the cavities below the ice shelv
Sea coast, indicating
increased basal melting due to
increased ocean heat fluxes in the cavities below the
ice shelves.
We see that the
arctic sea ice extent has
increased since then, currently up around the 2004 levels, so we're told that it's not actually the area, it's the thickness and what birthday it's celebrated.
It is claimed that AGW «science» predicted that Southern Hemsiphere
sea ice extent would
increase as
arctic sea ice would decrease.
according to NASA as of a few days ago, the above circular motion has now apparently started to reverse, indicating a probable cyclical future of several decades of
increasing arctic sea ice.
This would certainly explain why
arctic sea ice cover has been absolutely crashing in recent years while the HARDCRU / GISS global average temps had been
increasing more modestly.
If, as seems likely, the
arctic sea ice loss worsens in coming summers, we will get rain in
increasing amounts on increasingly large areas of Greenland.
quote loss of
sea ice in the
arctic leads to
increased ocean heat loss to the atmosphere resulting in more snow elsewhere.
Just recently a «scientist» at the German hyper alarmist PIK «found out» that the (temporary) loss of
sea ice in the
arctic leads to
increased ocean heat loss to the atmosphere resulting in more snow elsewhere.
Bob Tisdale says: January 10, 2011 at 3:05 pm Manfred says: «Just recently a «scientist» at the German hyper alarmist PIK «found out» that the (temporary) loss of
sea ice in the
arctic leads to
increased ocean heat loss to the atmosphere resulting in more snow elsewhere.
at some point the ocean temperature will not be warm enough to keep the
arctic sea ice melted and the
sea ice will
increase and halt the cooling.
We interpret the split of 2013 Outlooks above and below the 4.1 level to different interpretations of the guiding physics: those who considered that observed
sea ice extent in 2012 being well below the 4.1 level indicates a shift in
arctic conditions, especially with regard to reduced
sea ice thickness and
increased sea ice mobility; and those who have estimates above 4.1 who support a return to the longer - term downward trend line (1979 - 2007).
We interpret the split of 2013 Outlooks above and below the 4.1 median to different interpretations of the guiding physics: those who considered that observed
sea ice extent in 2012 being well below the 4.1 level indicates a shift in
arctic conditions, especially with regard to reduced
sea ice thickness and
increased sea ice mobility; and those with estimates above 4.1 who support a return to the longer - term downward trend line (1979 - 2007).
I try to give every visitor the assumption of sincere interest and a chance to defend their point of view (an effort that has been slipping over the years, I think I am tired) but the majority are immune to logic and scientific reason even on the trivial points like «weather is not climate» and «
arctic sea ice is
increasing ``.
Sea ice is lost due to
increasing ocean heat transport into the
arctic and the resulting loss of
ice causes the atmosphere to warm.
considering solar activity HAs indeed flatlined, it seems odd there is no associated
increase in
arctic sea ice levels.
A good point as
arctic regions that are hit with warmer water streams will prevent
sea ice extent while those with colder ones can massivly
increase in volume when the air is cold enough though no growth would be visible from the top down view.
The June Outlook for
arctic sea ice in September 2010 shows reasonable arguments for either a modest
increase or decrease in September 2010
sea ice extent compared to the last two years (5.4 million square kilometers in 2009 and 4.7 million square kilometers in 2008).
Meanwhile, global
sea ice has remained virtually unchanged for the last 30 years of satellite data, and has
increased in the
arctic over the last three years, making one wonder where the «enormous» heating is taking place.
THERE HAS BEEN A WARMING TREND FROM THE 70s THRU THE LATE 90s,... accompanied by other changes tied to a warming trend (record low
arctic sea ice extent & thickness, retreating glaciers, retreating snow lines, warming ocean surface temps,
increases in
sea height, de-alkalinizing oceans).
These are radical changes that require
increased communication within the
arctic science community to advance timely understanding of the
arctic sea ice system.
I predict that we we will soon see denialist arguments of the form «yeah sure global temperatures are again rising sharply, but that is due to decreased albedo due to decreased
arctic sea ice, not because
increased CO2 causes global warming».
The most significant threats to
arctic marine mammals comprise loss of
sea ice habitat and its associated highly productive food web along with the
increase in anthropogenic activities at high latitudes (Ragen et al. 2008).
From 1978 to 1996, the average
ice cover around Antarctica showed almost no trend (a slight
increase 1.3 % per decade), however
ice decreased by 2.9 % per decade on average over the
arctic seas (1).
The summer
arctic sea ice extent, in contrast, has been significantly under predicted by the models, while the summer Antarctic
sea ice extent
increase has been missed by the models.
How do you bridge a divide with attendees like Steven Goddard (who believes that it snows dry
ice in antarctica therefore proving all textbooks on physical chemistry wrong, and that
arctic sea ice volume is drastically
increasing), or Tallbloke (who rejects the last 90 - ish years of physics, starting with Einstein, and insists that the ether is real), etc etc?
Record droughts in many areas of the world, the loss of
arctic sea ice — what you see is an
increasing trend that is superimposed on annual variablity (no bets on what happens next year, but the five - to - ten year average in global temperatures,
sea surface temperatures, ocean heat content — those will
increase — and
ice sheet volumes, tropical glacier volumes,
sea ice extent will decrease.
Lett., 2011, doi: 10.1029 / 2011GL048008) evaluated the NCAR CCSM4 model
arctic sea ice trends and found that on time - scales less than 10 years, it's equally possible for the September
sea ice to
increase or decrease even into the 21st century.