Sentences with phrase «arguments against the model»

Not exact matches

It is certainly not the saying of the prophet, and Christians must not take it as a model, but it is the kind of argument the ordinary man can address to the ordinary man, and we must be on guard against scorning it (even if we are not to overrate it either).

But it is important to add that when the framers of the Constitution envisioned the rough - and - tumble world of public argument, they almost certainly imagined heated disagreements against a background of broadly shared values; certainly that was the model offered by John Locke.

Legislators considering changing their divorce laws should consider the full range of legal options available to them, such as those compiled by Americans for Divorce Reform and posted on their Internet «Divorce Reform Page «69 This site presents arguments for and against the initiatives as well as model legislation.

The report briefly sets out the arguments for and against a written constitution for the UK, and outlines three fully worked up options for future codification of the UK constitution, including a model Written Constitution.

Wrestling with Goldilocks The strangeness of quantum reality is far from the only argument against the old model of reality.

The model also counters another argument against oceans: that the proposed shorelines are very irregular, varying in height by as much as a kilometer, when they should be level, like shorelines on Earth.

Of the many inane arguments that are made against taking action on climate change, perhaps the most fatuous is that the projections climate models offer about the future are too uncertain to justify taking steps that might inconvenience us in the present.

There are many arguments for and against such a funding model, and I've seen it from both sides: from the view of a small lab competing for ever - shrinking NIH funds, and as part of a major collaboration funded by «big science» awards.

Probably the strongest argument against using growth models as the centerpiece of accountability systems is that they don't expect «enough» growth, especially for poor kids and kids of color.

Perhaps the better argument against the Audis, in particular the RS3, is given here, «Both Audi models benefit from good traction thanks to the all - wheel drive system, but also suffer from slightly top - heavy handling reflected in a tendency towards understeer.

Your argument against the agency model runs precisely both ways.

The argument I hear against trying it this way is that it is unproven and conservative executives don't seem to want to be the first to risk their company on unproven business models.

The two most common arguments against warming theories seem to be (1) local temperature variations (or mutually - inconclusive data) disprove global warming itself; and (2) models aren't real science, anyway, so we don't need to worry about them.

1) In the last few years the argument against Antarctic cooling squawkers has been that the situation fit the models.

• Lack of formal model verification & validation, which is the norm for engineering and regulatory science • Circularity in arguments validating climate models against observations, owing to tuning & prescribed boundary conditions • Concerns about fundamental lack of predictability in a complex nonlinear system characterized by spatio - temporal chaos with changing boundary conditions • Concerns about the epistemology of models of open, complex systems

The coalition did, however, as the article reported, remove from an internal report by the scientific advisory committee a section that said that «contrarian» theories of why global temperatures appeared to be rising «do not offer convincing arguments against the conventional model of greenhouse gas emission - induced climate change.»

Their failure do so is a good argument against them — e.g. «what model of AGW climate change are you using when you say that recent trends do not support AGW?»

Edwin Berry's only real argument against AGW is that models aren't 100 % accurate and therefore don't work.

Of the many inane arguments that are made against taking action on climate change, perhaps the most fatuous is that the projections climate models offer about the future are too uncertain to justify taking steps that might inconvenience us in the present.

I might as well label you an idiot for using it, when you've never met me, have no idea of my competence or the strength of my arguments for or against any aspect of climate dynamics (because on this list I argue both points of view as the science demands and am just as vigorous in smacking down bullshit physics used to challenge some aspect of CAGW as I am to question the physics or statistical analysis or modelling used to «prove» it).

«Feedbacks» argument: Here Bart argues against low climate sensitivity estimates cited by NIPCC by simply stating that they are much lower than the estimates, which are» accepted» by IPCC or that can «satisfactorily» be modeled by the IPCC models.

There argument of course doesn't mean that ACRIM is wrong, I still think the most damning evidence against PMOD was Doug Hoyt's letter in your supplementary material, and they only criticize your application of their proxy model.

This is not an argument against exploring alternative models or improving the existing one.

Given that he is arguing against bare assumptions, not even modelled, that is not an unreasonable argument.

New Scientist, also known as Nude Socia.list [spam block avoider there] magazine, never misses the opportunity to use the derogatory phrase «climate - change deniers» in order to smear sound scientific argument against an unverifiable computer modelled catastrophe driven by harmless aerial plant food gas.

I think the free market is very efficient at supplying capital in the most efficient and productive way possible, and that's why I think the arguments against a revenue - neutral model don't hold up.

The argument against Ripple: Critics here argue that there's a case that XRP could be considered a security because of the way that it was released in many ways a variation on the initial coin offering (ICO) model.

Arguments in favor of the author - pays, open - access model and against the reader - pays model included the following: