Sentences with phrase «arteta flam»

Ox's drive could have been used better in this position when Arteta Flam and the gang were there.
That engine room was crying out for muscle pace grit all that stuff, so am glad he's not replacing Rosicky Arteta Flam with like for likes (well another Rosicky wouldn't be a bad thing).
I know Arteta Flam and Rosicky are on the way out but you would have to promise a certain amount of football to a player of Isco's ilk, the thing is Aaron and Cazorla also want that insurance.

Not exact matches

seeing ozil on LW, seeing arteta & flam at DM.
we're at the flam / arteta level.
If he'd be ok with that then fine I suppose, he's easily the best / most likely to ever play of the 4 (flam, arteta, jack and diaby) but still well off compared to Coq, Cazorla, Ramsey and Rosicky, and Kongdogbia, were we to sign him.
Arteta is worth keeping for his experience but Flam and Diaby should be moved on.
Arteta and flam MAY NOT get the same recognition as TR7... love u!!!!
I think a big reason is we're not looking at a squad with Flim - Flam, Rosicky and Arteta in it wondering how many games they're likely to knock up between them for 240k in wages.
; i think diaby can be better than flam / arteta easily.
If we get to a comfortable position within game well then that might be best time for Alexis rest, Cazorla too with Arteta or Flam coming on.
what kind of person would offer arteta & flam an extension?
he is guilty of abdicating his responsibility by not doing everything he could to buy a WC striker and a backup for coq (instead he offered flam and arteta another year — my god!).
For half of last season we had Flim - Flam, Arteta and Coquelin... Second half we had Elneny and Flim - flam......... Need I say mFlam, Arteta and Coquelin... Second half we had Elneny and Flim - flam......... Need I say mflam......... Need I say more?
coq was out for 2 months and teams blew through our middle (root cause: wenger did nt buy cdm backup in summer, using flam / arteta).
It is possible that Coquelin does not have the season he had last year which would leave us with Coq, Arteta and Flam as we stand, (not good at all).
This is painful still cant believe how thin our defense is and that we rely on Flam and Arteta as DM cover
The proof will be in the pudding I am almost 99.9 % certain he will carry Chelsea to the title, if ppl on her r telling me we couldmt have got rid of any if the following arteta, diaby, flam, id even throw wilshere (rubbish) in there and get a proven world class player in team then more fool you.
i'd risk calum at DM because i do nt rate arteta (too slow) or flam (too clumsy) v city.
however because he's cheap & indecisive, we're still short at the crucial DM position (flam / arteta: best days behind): we need a world - class DM and a good backup.
the MAIN thing is going to be coq's absence: thats the one that will really hurt us as we see flam and arteta back in «action».
for pacy wingers u do nt put flam & arteta.
just no flam or arteta.
still cant believe flam / arteta got a contract for 2015 - 16.
but we don't have the personnel in CDM right now (arteta & flam: what a joke?).
Countless times this year he has recklessly bombed forward and made the wrong decision, exposing Arteta, Flam and Le Coq to quick numbered counter attacks from the opposition.
Still, it's refreshing looking down the pecking order and not seeing Flim - flam, Rosicky and Arteta and having to rely on aged legs, if of course, they're available at all!!
Message to Wenger: If you leave arsenal next season, please bring along merts, flam, arteta... cuz those are virus inside arsenal DNA...
arteta / flam should be 3rd and 4th for CDM.
I think the exits of Flim - Flam, Arteta and Rosicky should be more than enough midfield exits for one window... A couple of hundred k off the wage bill should be more than enough to bring in one or two fresher, younger midfielders.
The DM debate marches on, whether you think we need someone better than Coquelin or not I think most would agree to feeling more secure playing United / Chelsea away with Schneiderlin vs Arteta / Flam in the evetn Coquelin was out.
why would you go into a season w flam, arteta and roziscky??? why would you sub on flam at barcelona?
Think Arteta is past it for me and i can't stand Flam in the team, has no vision of thr game and jus slows it down for us!
2) The Coq / Arteta / Flam trio is a symptom of our financial prudence.
i do nt want to see arteta / flam.
chambers at DM would def better arteta, flam.
i do nt believe the best DM we couldve got would not have been better than flam / arteta.
#halfajob get a DM (actually we need 2 because one will get injured and flam / arteta should be respectfully retired).
He did mention the game with Man U and said Kos Flam and Arteta are all out.
AW must delude himself that flam / arteta (or paulista or chambers) could help out there.
wenger's faith in his players causes him to overlook their faults — which leads to even less buying and to the a squad that has flam and arteta in it.
Striker n d m now the latter for 7 + years has been a problem and some might debate Coquelin is good enough and I might agree but boy arteta n flam are certainly not, Pedro Benteke would be more then good enough for arsenal.
If you ever saw the games where Cazorla played alongside Flam or Arteta you would have noticed the EXACT SAME weaknesses you currently see with the Flam / Rambo partnership.
maybe he's so deluded he thinks arteta / flam can fill in for coq?
then its game over and we can give players like ox, arteta, flam etc a bit of a run.
i'd also put arteta and flam both in CDM and give coq a rest or at least 45 min.
With Flim - flam, arteta and rosicky all gone.
Flam Arteta and Rosicky stayed on for too long, Ill be glad we have those positions to be filled.
Doesn't utilise our best players, the only way this really works is to drop Ozil and play Ox or Campbell LW and play Wilshere in the mid 3 with Rambo and Flam / Arteta.
flam / arteta are good enough to fill in for coq (who wont get injured anyway) 4.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z