Sentences with phrase «as a court order requiring»

The lawsuit asks for financial restitution to the company as well as a court order requiring Facebook to improve its corporate governance and internal procedures.

Not exact matches

The Internet companies described their policies as straightforward: they ban certain types of content in accordance with their own terms of service, and require court orders to remove or block anything beyond that.

The Securities and Exchange Commission said it's seeking a court order requiring Shawn Carter — better known as Jay - Z — to comply with a subpoena for testimony.

As a consequence of the company's failure to comply with its obligations to pay the required volume in BTC, the court ordered that the company either pay up or be declared insolvent.

January 2011 — After a federal law was passed to transfer a WWI Memorial, in the Mojave Desert, to private ownership, the U. S. Supreme Court ruled that the cross in the memorial could continue to stand, but the Obama administration refused to allow the land to be transferred, as required by law, and refused to allow the cross to be re-erected as ordered by the Court.

We may need to disclose personal information to meet legal or regulatory requirements, such as under a court order or to a government institution if required or authorized by law.

Justice Anka also ruled that leave was not required for the matter to be heard during vacation as Order 4 Rule 5 of the Fundamental Rights Enforcement Procedure Rules of 2009, enjoins the court to pursue speed and justice on issues of fundamental human rights.

«Once the accuracy of the designation of a controlee as a terrorist suspect has been verified by the court, as a general rule judges should recognise that officials and the police have far more understanding of the restrictions required to effect a control order,» he said.

On June 25, the Michigan Libertarian Party filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Detroit, seeking an order requiring the Michigan Secretary of State, Ruth Johnson, to list Gary Johnson on the ballot as the Libertarian presidential nominee.

Nassau has until Feb. 7 to comply with a court order requiring the county to pay $ 36 million in damages, as well as legal fees and interest, to John Restivo and Dennis Halstead, seen on Dec. 29, 2005.

Defense teams are starting to ask questions and require the government to produce documentation such as court orders, and that's creating the confrontation you're now seeing.

As required by executive orders and a 2008 court ruling, federal agencies use the SCC to inform regulators about the economic consequences of rules they adopt.

In response to a subpoena or similar investigative demand, a court order, or a request for cooperation from law enforcement or other government agency; to establish or exercise our legal rights; to defend against legal claims; or as otherwise required by law.

Such personal data is stored by FilmOn in accordance with and for the duration established in the provisions of data protection provisions established within the EU and it may be deleted by FilmOn in accordance with such provisions, subject to compulsory legal provisions or orders from national authorities such as courts requiring FilmOn to store and maintain such personal data at the disposal of the authorities.

In 1993, following a state supreme court order to equalize public school spending, the state's school finance system adopted a provision known as the «Robin Hood» law that requires property - rich districts to subsidize poorer districts within the state.

Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge James C. Chalfant had ordered L.A. Unified to show that it was using test scores in evaluations by Tuesday after ruling earlier this year that state law required such data as evidence of whether teachers have helped their students progress academically.

Leadership for Educational Equity may share your Personally Identifiable Information with various government authorities in response to subpoenas, court orders, or other legal process; to establish or exercise our legal rights or to protect our property; to defend against legal claims; or as otherwise required by law.

The Education Practices Commission may suspend the educator certificate of any person as defined in s. 1012.01 (2) or (3) for up to 5 years, thereby denying that person the right to teach or otherwise be employed by a district school board or public school in any capacity requiring direct contact with students for that period of time, after which the holder may return to teaching as provided in subsection (4); may revoke the educator certificate of any person, thereby denying that person the right to teach or otherwise be employed by a district school board or public school in any capacity requiring direct contact with students for up to 10 years, with reinstatement subject to the provisions of subsection (4); may revoke permanently the educator certificate of any person thereby denying that person the right to teach or otherwise be employed by a district school board or public school in any capacity requiring direct contact with students; may suspend the educator certificate, upon an order of the court or notice by the Department of Revenue relating to the payment of child support; or may impose any other penalty provided by law, if the person:

Except as required for use by the president in the discharge of his or her official responsibilities, the custodian of limited - access records may release information from such records only upon authorization in writing from the employee or upon order of a court of competent jurisdiction.

On December 7, 2010, the court found that LAUSD's failure to provide facilities offers violates Proposition 39 and ordered LAUSD to make offers as required by law.

LAUSD is now required by court order to identify the arrangements for charter schools» use of ancillary space on offered campuses, such as libraries, cafeterias, science labs and play fields.

(2) signed by an individual, or his parent, to the effect that he has been denied admission to or not permitted to continue in attendance at a public college by reason of race, color, religion, or national origin, and the Attorney General believes the complaint is meritorious and certifies that the signer or signers of such complaint are unable, in his judgment, to initiate and maintain appropriate legal proceedings for relief and that the institution of an action will materially further the orderly achievement of desegregation in public education, the Attorney General is authorized, after giving notice of such complaint to the appropriate school board or college authority and after certifying that he is satisfied that such board or authority has had a reasonable time to adjust the conditions alleged in such complaint, to institute for or in the name of the United States a civil action in any appropriate district court of the United States against such parties and for such relief as may be appropriate, and such court shall have and shall exercise jurisdiction of proceedings instituted pursuant to this section, provided that nothing herein shall empower any official or court of the United States to issue any order seeking to achieve a racial balance in any school by requiring the transportation of pupils or students from one school to another or one school district to another in order to achieve such racial balance, or otherwise enlarge the existing power of the court to insure compliance with constitutional standards.

No order of the court shall require the admission or reinstatement of an individual as a member of a union or the hiring, reinstatement, or promotion of an individual as an employee, or the payment to him of any back pay, if such individual was refused admission, suspended, or expelled or was refused employment or advancement or was suspended or discharged for any reason other than discrimination on account of race, color, religion, sex or national origin or in violation of section 704 (a).

At the very least, Amazon is sure to demand the same power to discount as its rival Apple is required to retain — even though Apple will likely not use its court - ordered discounting power.»

But the knowledge of exemptions is still important to chapter 13 debtors, since the Bankruptcy Code requires that chapter 13 plans, in order to be confirmed by the court, must provide as much payment to the debtor's unsecured creditors as these creditors would receive in a theoretical chapter 7 liquidation.

At a Chapter 13 confirmation hearing, required as the basis for the order approving the plan and ordering the creditors to accept it (the hearing is called a section 341 hearing, or simply, â $ the three forty - oneâ $), the court either approves or disapproves the debtorâ $ ™ s repayment plan, depending on whether it meets the Bankruptcy Codeâ $ ™ s requirements for confirmation.

In the event the court of competent jurisdiction orders that the dog be returned to the owner, the owner shall be required to pay the kennel fee as set forth by animal control during the period that the animal was held.

That, if a person fails to pay the civil penalty, fails to appear in court to contest the citation, or fails to appear in court as required by subsection (6), the court may issue an order to show cause upon the request of the governing body of the county or municipality.

The procedure for the person to follow in order to pay the civil penalty, to contest the citation, or to appear in court as required under subsection (6).

In 1975, the defendants were found liable for negligence and conflict of interest, were removed as executors of the Rothko estate by court order, and, along with Marlborough Gallery, were required to pay a $ 9.2 million damages judgment to the estate.

Earlier this week UVA — as required by a court order — delivered records relating to Climategate «Hockey Stick» chart creator Michael Mann that ATI asked for in January under a Freedom of -LSB-...]

We may also share your personally identifiable information to respond to law enforcement requests, court orders, or other legal processes; or if we believe that such disclosure is necessary to investigate, prevent, or respond to illegal activities, fraud, physical threats to you or others; or as otherwise required by any applicable law or regulation.

In these circumstances the Court decided to refer the following questions for a preliminary ruling to the CJEU: 1) whether for the purposes of Art. 2 (2)(c), Member States can require the direct descendant who is older than 21 years to have tried, without success, to obtain employment in the country of origin in order to be regarded as «dependant» and fall within the scope of the provision; and 2) whether in interpreting the term «dependant» any significance should be attached to the fact that the family member is, due to the personal circumstances such as age, education and health, deemed to obtain employment in the host Member State, which would mean that the conditions of dependence will no longer be met.

At least the court revised the insurer's proposed terms to circumscribe the obligation in these terms: «The defence insurer shall be entitled to require the claimant to undergo medical examination at its request upon reasonable notice being given to the claimant at any time during the claimant's lifetime, such medical examinations to be limited to obtaining a medical opinion as to the claimant's general health in order to obtain a quotation for the purchase cost of an annuity to fund the periodical payments and / or (not more frequently than once every seven years) for the express purposes of reviewing its reserve.

For example, pointed out the court, although the UK has opted in to the Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of 18 December 2008 on enforcement of maintenance orders, it has opted out of the provisions of the Hague Protocol 2007 as to applicable law (ie other states, required to apply the law to an English order, will be required to apply English law).

Urgent is defined as cases in which an order of the court is required to regulate the position between the moment the order is made and the next available sitting of the court in normal court hours.

If you choose not to follow the Protocol, you issue proceedings and either your debtor is familiar with the Protocol or instructs solicitors who are, then the following sanctions can be imposed by the court: - • An order staying the proceedings which also requires compliance with the Protocol; • An order that if you have not complied you pay the costs of the proceedings or part of the costs of the other side even if you obtain judgment in your favour; • An order that those costs are paid on a more stringent basis known as an indemnity basis; • An order depriving the party who is at fault of any entitlement to interest or alternatively awarding interest at a reduced rate; • Depending on who is at fault the court can also order payment of a higher interest rate of up to 10 % above base rate.

Given the modest value of the estate, the Honourable Justice Corthorn ordered Sheila and Kevin to provide an accounting to the Court, and the Court would then determine whether a full passing of accounts would be required and whether the proposed substitution of Sheila and Kevin as estate trustees was appropriate.

Section 112 of Singapore's Women's Charter empowers the courts to order such division of matrimonial assets as they deem «just and equitable» and requires the courts to consider a host of specified factors in making that decision.

Finally, it is often required by many courts that, in order to be labeled a seaman, a maritime employee must spend at least 30 % of his or her time aboard the vessel; however, this amount of time is simply a ballpark figure and is not used as a cut - off line.

The policy at issue in this case, was crafted in such a way that in order to engage the insurer's duty to defend, it required the communication, during the policy period, by a third party, of an intention to hold the Jesuits responsible for damages.36 In this case, it was accepted by the parties, that if the claims were made within the temporal limits of the Policy, the duty to defend would have been engaged as the claims allege injuries that would fall within the policy.37 In fact the Court found one of the claims was made within the policy period and therefore did trigger the insurer's duty to defend.38 The rest of the claims however were found not to have been communicated during the policy period and, as a result, the insurer did not have a duty to defend the actions.39 The determination of whether a policy will be «claims - made» or «occurrence based» will depend on many factors.

The Court was satisfied that the disclosure of the two agreements was required in order to police the freezing order, but ordered that Zamin could make separate submissions as to why the disclosure of the agreements could be commercially damaging, before having to disclose the agreements themselves to ENRC.

In short: there was no material change as required by section 17 of the Divorce Act, so there was no legal basis on which a court could vary the order.

Second, the court held that in order for the RCD to apply, separate and formal legislative action is not required if a regulator already has the regulatory authority to take actions that might otherwise violate the Competition Act (in this case, the LCBO's authority to enter into contracts such as the Beer Framework Agreement).

In addition to a fine or even as a stand - alone order, the court can order a publicity order requiring the defendant company to advertise its conviction for corporate manslaughter, to include details of the offence, the level of fine and the terms of any remedial order made.

At the same time, the court deferred ruling on the bar's claim that LegalZoom is engaged in unauthorized practice, concluding that a more extensive factual record is required in order to explain questions such as how LegalZoom's process prepares complex documents for its customers.

So the author is asking the Court of Justice of the EU to require the Italian courts to set aside M.A.S and M.B's human right to a fair trial, as guaranteed by the Italian Constitution, in order to pursue the policy goal of efficient tax collection, because, in the author's interpretation of global law, such efficient tax collection is also in the service of fundamental rights which Prof. Capaldo interprets as also present in the global legal order.

On 3 December 1984, Latey J, sitting with a senior Divorce Registry registrar as adviser, granted the petitioner an order of mandamus requiring Judge Heald to hear the appeal (see R v Nottingham County Court, ex parte Byers (1984) The Times, 5 December).

You hereby grant Box and its contractors the right to transmit, use and disclose Content posted on the Service solely to the extent necessary to provide the Service, as otherwise permitted by these Terms, or to comply with any request of a governmental or regulatory body (including subpoenas or court orders), as otherwise required by law, or to respond to an emergency which Box believes in good faith requires Box to disclose information to assist in preventing the death or serious bodily injury of any person.

The Courts in Ontario may in the required circumstances recognize and enforce Georgia equitable orders such as injunctions (not just money judgments).