Not exact matches
But in her work, and that of other
abstract painters I've mentioned, the issue of whether
there is anything already in such paintings,
as opposed to what we might «read» into them, is often raised.
It should be noted that while the overall effect of Murray's work is one of abstraction, and the artist described herself
as an
abstract painter in an interview included in the 1987 catalogue,
there are many representational elements and references in her paintings, in a stylized style emerging from cartoons, comics, and graffiti
as well
as from pop artists like Claes Oldenburg: works are shaped like shoes or cups and contains stylized
abstracted but identifiable figuration and still - life imagery.
There has never been a better year to look at the work of Kazimir Malevich, a pioneer of
abstract art often seen
as the greatest Russian
painter of the twentieth century.
David Reed is a grandmaster — no
painter has contributed
as much in terms of expanding the vocabulary of
abstract painting and maintaining its relevance during this era of marginalization, although
there are many in New York who currently enjoy greater status.
The Modernist
painter and educator Hans Hofmann once said, «
There is no such thing as representational painting and abstract painting: there is only intelligent painting and stupid painting.&r
There is no such thing
as representational painting and
abstract painting:
there is only intelligent painting and stupid painting.&r
there is only intelligent painting and stupid painting.»
In your
abstract works I see references to, or inflections of, numerous
abstract painters such
as Robert Motherwell, Frank Stella, even a bit of Jules Olitski and Mary Heilmann here and
there.
Condo started making «drawing - paintings», where you can't distinguish e.g. paint from pastel, or a line made with a paintbrush or a line drawn in from and thus making the two mediums equal: «
There's no real difference between figurative painting or
abstract painting, «cause it's all painting to begin with... You don't» have to follow any rules
as a
painter.
McNeil speaks of why he became interested in art; his early influences; becoming interested in modern art after attending lectures by Vaclav Vytlacil; meeting Arshile Gorky; the leading figures in modern art during the 1930s; his interest in Cézanne; studying with Jan Matulka and Hans Hofmann; his experiences with the WPA; the modern artists within the WPA; the American
Abstract Artists (A.A.A.); a group of
painters oriented to Paris called The Ten; how
there was an anti-surrealism attitude, and a surrealist would not have been permitted in A.A.A; what the A.A.A. constituted
as abstract art; a grouping within the A.A.A. called the Concretionists; his memories of Léger; how he assesses the period of the 1930s; the importance of Cubism; what he thinks caused the decline of A.A.A.; how he assesses the period of the 1940s; his stance on form and the plastic values in art; his thoughts on various artists; the importance of The Club; the antipathy to the School of Paris after the war; how Impressionism was considered in the 40s and 50s; slides of his paintings from 1937 to 1962, and shows how he developed
as an artist; the problems of
abstract expressionism; organic and geometric form; the schisms in different art groups due to politics; his teaching techniques; why he feels modern painting declined after 1912; the quality of A.A.A. works; stretching his canvases, and the sizes he uses; his recent works, and his approaches to painting.
There is, in van Velde's work, a quality of indecision and incompleteness, of being improvised rather than planned, of being left in a transitional stage, in other words, of Provisionalism —
as defined by Raphaël Rubinstein in his now famed article from 2009 — which makes it relevant to today's state of affairs in
abstract painting
as well
as to the young
painters loosely grouped under the name of New Casualists.
Regarding my artistic environment
there, I was quite isolated and
as an
abstract painter I was absolutely exotic.
There won't be any more legacy of
abstract expressionism, the great avant garde of mid-20th century America, when
painters such
as Poons are gone.
Looking at this,
as at the absent Women, it seems perverse if not actually impossible to think of De Kooning how he was once seen,
as an
abstract painter: he was
as embedded in the experience of landscape and mutable light
as the American «luminist» Martin Johnson Heade had been out
there among the dunes a century before.
And I think
there was a point where people said, Oh, Chris Martin's an
abstract painter, but I'd always been making these odd, figurative things
as well.
However the questions raised make me feel
there is also considerable insecurity
as an
abstract painter.
I'm sure
there is a sense of intrigue
as to what will come next, but for now we can enjoy the wonderful spaces that this former scene - painting studio houses and get a meaty glimpse of the work of a significant British
abstract painter to boot.
David Reed is a grand master — no
painter has contributed
as much in terms of expanding the vocabulary of
abstract painting and maintaining its relevance during this era of marginalization — although
there are many in New York who currently enjoy greater status.