Sentences with phrase «as another reviewer pointed»

As another reviewer pointed out, eating healthy also means avoiding foods that your child is sensitive to.

While our previous manuscript (Gilja et al., 2015) showed improved continuous control performance over earlier approaches, as the reviewer points out, the current study adds a parallel decoding method to enable discrete selection (the HMM), which is a critical step in developing point - and - click interfaces that would be suitable to control a general purpose computing device.

As our reviewer points out, even though success has brought Sedaris out of his previously tragic life, he still has no problem turning his experiences into humorous material:

Although largely focused on abstract forms, Nitegeka, as our reviewer points out, also makes a return to some figurative work in order to explicate his theme.

Not exact matches

In the book, I make a brief but impassioned case for reading the text with the prejudice of love, a hermeneutic I believe was employed by Jesus, and, as many reviewers have pointed out, a hermeneutic that Augustine also favored.

As I read the review, and compared it with what I read in Wright, it appears to me that the reviewer has not fully grasped Wright's point.

This reviewer should point out that Berger acknowledges that the book was written over a period of two years «in moments snatched from other busy activities as a social scientist.»

The chief is that it has literary difficulties, as Marty, true to form, was the first reviewer to point out.

The trouble is that, as several reviewers pointed out, his Catholicism differs here in no way from the High Church wing of Anglicanism.

Even as the reviewer urges the writer of the teleplay to stick to The Script, however, the point is again being made: John and Jesus are purely literary presences.

It's a good jumping - off point, as other reviewers have said, but without the garlic and the ginger it's mostly just salty.

Reviewers point out that this model really is best on furniture, and doesn't handle hard wood floors nearly as well.

India's lasting contribution to the computing industry has mainly been the development of the outsourcing service delivery model, however, as reviewer Somaditya Banerjee points out, India may ultimately leave a mark in other arenas as well.

This last point doesn't only mean that you have to prove your general competence as a scientist; it also means you have to have a strong research plan that the reviewers are persuaded you can execute.

The day - to - day functions of the scientific directors are to act as contact points for potential applicants, read around 700 applications to check for eligibility and to assign them to members of the review committee, provide support to applicants and reviewers throughout the process, and maintain close contact with the awardees.

He points, too, to the increased linkage of research funding to jobs and subsistence as factors that promote conservatism — not just among reviewers, but in the community as a whole.

According to Olshansky, «I may have mentioned some technical points that I won't get into, as a reviewer.»

The cookies didn't come out very chewy — more fluffy, like a few other reviewers pointed out — and they didn't have much flavour to them, as they are only spiced with a touch of nutmeg.

Each color is lovely and, as other reviewers pointed out, the poncho runs large.

I purchased the chili color, which is a bit more pink than red as one reviewer pointed out, but it's still tasteful.

The Retro Studios platformer is rated by Polygon's reviewer as «a high point for the series» that...

As a point of departure for my first editorial for Research in Learning Technology, this seemed appropriate; a reflection on how — along with my fellow editors, our contributing authors and pool of reviewers — we have worked together to surface these six stories of research in this field.

I've written previously about its role in creating proof points capable of scaling for the field that help propel the education system more toward a fully competency - based, student - centric one, and now NGLC is at it again (full disclosure: I serve as a reviewer for their grants).

As Dropout Nation has pointed out ad nauseam in the two years since U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan announced the initiative, the administration has approved waivers in spite of questions raised by its own reviewers about whether states would even fulfill the promises made in their plans.

Though all of the reviews of the literature indicated that the effects of computer technologies upon student achievement are generally positive, it is important to point out that none of the reviewers advocated computer technology as the solution to educational problems in the United States.

As reviewer Marnie Colton points out in her blog post at BookBrowse, biographies in poetry form allow for freedom of expression that a more constraining non-fiction prose form might not.

There are indicators to prove this point — for example, if a celebrity or reviewer have strong bases in a particular country, say the US, and sales are good in the US, but not, say, UK and Australia, then the conclusion can strongly be given that the opportunity was successful for the reasons outlined above, but nothing much else, such as intrinsic quality.

Many reviewers have noted that Avatar's weak link is the clunky / predictable dialogue («we'll fight terror with terror,» «you have a good heart,» etc.), and as the New York Times ArtsBeat blog points out, of the nine Academy Awards nominations Avatar has received, none is for best original screenplay.

Reviewer Jesse Scheeden says this issue is a good pick for longtime fans as well as newcomers, who will find it an easy jumping - on point.

I fear however that that day, given reviewers unwillingness to distance themselves from traditional big publishers as you so rightly pointed out, is rather far off into the future!

Our reviewer writes, «These stories underscore Moore's point that the meaning of life is clearer when we are willing to serve others, whether as an inner - city principal or a social entrepreneur.

Some reviewers have pointed out redeeming aspects of the story such as the ability of the human spirit to survive, to create new lives after war.

Try your best to consider the reviewer's points as dispassionately as you can.

As other writers have pointed out already, «outing» reviewers on the site is not only an appalling way to handle the problem, it is downright dangerous.

Yes, some of the reviewers pointed out the editing flaws as I feared and some were dubious about ADD, but overall the reviews were positive and helpful, and more importantly, worth the risk!

Reviewers praised the device for being a solid outing at an affordable price point, but as with most first - gen tablets, cited a lack of incentive to go with Acer instead of their better - priced competitors.

One reviewer pointed out that Blair's writing is genuine as opposed to the usual political pompousness that seems to be the norm in many political memoirs or autobiographies.

Not only will you learn about Hawaii's history, landscape and other stories along the way, but your tour guide might point out certain species of trees, animals and more — as one online reviewer pointed out.

However, as other reviewers have pointed out, the a / c feels like it hasn't had a service since the 1980s, the empty fridge had dead insects inside its yellow stained interior.

A few setbacks that will be fixed is a bad thing, not saying it isn't or that it's not worth demerits / penalties - but it's obvious that server problems at launch - as bad as they are to the consumers, to get such a hefty pounding over it where a reviewer is all like «I take my review back, I'm lowering my score until the servers get better - Oh hey, 6 months later the servers are better, here, have a 7.5 again» That does not sound professional no matter how you want to put it (Not like anyone goes to Polygon for anything professional anyways): / Short - comings or downfalls that are temporary should be given Shame I'd say, a definite negative feedback in some variety which comes all but naturally with the players whether a reviewer points it out or not, customer reviewers do that and I think should be used for these kind of problems.

As many other critics and reviewers are pointing out, Ubisoft are currently developing the same game over and over again with tweaks depending on the setting.

The only real complaint reviewers had with the game was that the dialogue didn't quite pop, which made me jubilant as I was applying for a writer position and dialogue is my strong point.

I see what you're saying, but the point is that this is still a serious gaming news & review website, and their journalists just made a completely dumb comparison which is not only unjust towards a game, it portrays a level of unprofessionalism (is that even a word) in the article itself, as these reviewers are supposed to at least know what they're talking about.

As one example of this, climate scientist and accredited IPCC reviewer Nic Lewis noted that if 2001, 2002, or 2003 were used as a starting point, data suggests that the planet has actually been cooling by a relatively insignificant 0.02 C to 0.05 C per decadAs one example of this, climate scientist and accredited IPCC reviewer Nic Lewis noted that if 2001, 2002, or 2003 were used as a starting point, data suggests that the planet has actually been cooling by a relatively insignificant 0.02 C to 0.05 C per decadas a starting point, data suggests that the planet has actually been cooling by a relatively insignificant 0.02 C to 0.05 C per decade.

It seems to me that you can not tell the difference between «measurement precision» and «floating point precision», and maybe that is the problem the reviewers have as well.

I agree with your 3 points, but I would recommend more general statements, for example, author disclosure of potential conflicts of interest (financial or NON-financial — such as membership in related organizations / lobbies) and transparency in the peer - review process (e.g. reviewers to be identified).

Just as you don't offer one on the point I drew out from Steve: that O'Donnell et al should have been told by JoC that Reviewer A was Steig.

Worse, as a reviewer, I asked Wahl and Ammann to disclose verification r2 and CE statistics — a point that was in controversy — and where I knew that they had got precisely the same results as us, because their code matched ours — something that they failed to disclose.

There are times when I am asked to sign a Nondisclosure Form or something similar and I wanted to know if there was a way to supersede that with my own form or statement within my work profile to state something to the point of «should I find fault or other hazards or ethical issues with the product, my integrity and rights as a reviewer / blogger / etc hereby revoke any previously signed documents in order to maintain personal integrity and liability» Or is the document signed between me and said company / persons legally binding regardless of my Independent Contractor clauses?

Improve the experience of your contract reviewers while allowing managers to get a better handle on team pain points and ensure contracts are being reviewed as intended.