Sentences with phrase «as commented above»

As I commented above, Rothko veered towards the dark, tumultous colors when his mindset became darker.

As I commented above, I am VERY uncomfortable getting a device without a keyboard because I don't think Windows 8 has a good software keyboard.

As I commented above, I fully understand that some rescues get dogs for free or for nominal sums of money as a result of relationships with those who produce and auction dogs.

As commented above, difficult to believe this is just bad luck or overall longevity trends for octagenarians.

As commented above a high payout ratio is not unexpected for a utility.

Yes this film definitely recalls the overlooked Melinda and Melinda, Matchpoint and (as commented above) the masterful Crimes and Misdemeanors.

It's just as I commented above, Theo scores a hat trick in a non-event game and we waltz passed a pi $ $ poor Villa and we're into the transfer window thinking we have no weaknesses.

As I commented above, these results are partly due to my belief in not trying to time the market.

As commented above a high payout ratio is not unexpected for a utility.

Your argument is neither «winning», nor even valid, as the comments above clearly show.

It's a not an implausible claim, as my comments above suggest.

the issues with oats you raise seem to be around absorbtion and some sensitivity issues some people have to it (as the comments above validate!).

As the comments above discuss, what is referred to is using non-teachers «to fulfil roles such as finance managers and multi-academy trust chief executives».

As my comments above, good to hear.

As the comment above says, remove the seat and look in the tracks for a coin.

I was trying to make one as an x-mas present with measurements from Amazon for a new kindle that hasn't yet arrived, and of course I was doing it at the same time as the comment above about the top being too wide.

Hi — the government issue bundle dlc is not showing as free and I have a season pass, same as the comment above.

As I comment above: There is no way around the fact that judgment is always involved in interpreting empirical results.

Not exact matches

In fact, the comments section of the above mentioned article has many stories of people who did sell in past years because they thought house prices were too high, only to subsequently watch from the sidelines as prices continued to march upward.

Then comment as you would above.

As I tried to illustrate in the comments above, the government has to obtain the funds it spends from some source - the nonbank public through taxes or borrowing or from the Fed and depository institutions.

Daniels provided comment to reporters as well, saying Cohen as «for years» acted «like he is above the law» and has «openly referred to himself as Mr. Trump's fixer.»

As fully discussed above in Section B, the Department received many comments supporting and opposing the applicability date delay.

The President directed that if the Department makes an affirmative determination as to any of the above three considerations, or the Department concludes for any other reason, after appropriate review, that the Fiduciary Rule, PTEs, or both are inconsistent with the priority of the Administration «to empower Americans to make their own financial decisions, to facilitate their ability to save for retirement and build the individual wealth necessary to afford typical lifetime expenses, such as buying a home and paying for college, and to withstand unexpected financial emergencies,» then the Department shall publish for notice and comment a proposed rule rescinding or revising the Fiduciary Rule, as appropriate and as consistent with law.

I think it's appropriate to reference in this article as additional insight per comment above.

Meanwhile, the Selling Pressure Index, which had hovered around 275 since mid-2015 declined almost continually as 2017 progressed to reach its current 160 level, prompting the above upbeat comments from Lowry's Research analysts.

I believe (as per earlier comments above about the «slow implosion» of the eurozone) that there's a real power struggle going on here.

Thus far in 2005, the dollar has risen back to around 1.30 against the euro, in part reflecting the fact that the US federal funds rate has now risen above the monetary policy rate in the euro area, as well as comments from European officials expressing concerns about the extent of the appreciation of the euro.

As you mentioned in a comment above Keynes started out as a kind of momentum investor but by the end of his career he'd essentially invented value investinAs you mentioned in a comment above Keynes started out as a kind of momentum investor but by the end of his career he'd essentially invented value investinas a kind of momentum investor but by the end of his career he'd essentially invented value investing.

As far as bonds go, Rico (comment above) exaggerates when he says that «bonds are not an investment.&raquAs far as bonds go, Rico (comment above) exaggerates when he says that «bonds are not an investment.&raquas bonds go, Rico (comment above) exaggerates when he says that «bonds are not an investment.»

I also dislike her closed comments policy, I'm sure if I posted the above blurb, she'd censor it, even though I'm just as Bible - thumping as the next indy fundy girl.

Just as this article said, and my comment above, to solve the divide, we can: (1) Argue about the definition of Race / God (2) Argue about identification in a religion / race (3) Or realize the fundamental problem of prejudice that sneaks into human - made abstractions like «race» and «God».

When Jesus said in Mark 14:7 «The poor you will always have with you,» He probably was referring to the fact that 2000 years later we'd still be arguing over how, what, when, where, etc. to do with the poor, just as all of the above comments bear out.

TheLies» comment above about your post as usual conveniently ignores the critical point that crimes done by Stalin et al were not done under any guidance of atheism, whereas the guidance to do the many atrocities that Christians have done can be found in the many horrific instructions «from god» presented in the Christian book of nasty AKA the bible.

Just as a point of clarification to Bill's post above, while I welcome what I thinkis a imporant point we should al keep in mind I would in no way ever see myself as an important part of the conversation more a present somewhat comenting bystander although my ego was very flattered when I read Bill's comment

Of the total comments, as defined by the above parameters, 243 were made by women.

And when I ask for any justification of their view, I get such comments as Brigitte's above — «Christine said she can't see what people see in the Bible, so I am not quite sure why it matters.»

I might have misunderstood Ryan's comment above, and maybe I am misunderstanding yours as well (It's late!).

I think Jay may be writing in response to Mark Richmond's comment above where he basically says that what Christians say about homosexuals and women is not as bad as what Muslims say?

Future comments such as the above two comments that amount to name - calling and personal attacks will be deleted.

Having read most, if not all of the posts Jeremy has written that directly or as an aside discuss Calvinism, I am certain that most or all of what you are stating in the above comment is not what Jeremy is saying.

As for me regarding the human condition, I'd refer to my comments above about the christocentric view of human nature).

I guess I'm going to have to change my user name since I am not the same Beth as above and don't want our comments to be confused with each other...

Hey I saw the comment you made about the prophetic above and saw it as very negative.

Unfortunately, this blog comment format isn't adequate for maieutics, which would be the easiest way to show you where exactly you are wrong, as both Davids above.

What Heidegger seems to suggest, comments Macquarrie, is that the discovery of truth is not just the result of human striving, does not involve ridding the psyche of all distorting influences so as to hear the truth plainly, but is an event «above and beyond our willing and doing» in which Being gives itself to be known.

As I indicated in the comment above, it's like the «promise of faithfulness, love, loyalty, and service» that we made on our wedding day to our spouse.

Fifth: Because we can't actually measure or determine any of the above, your comment comes off as pure judgemental arrogance.

It points, in Luke 16:19 - 26 to the future life as a reversal of the values of this (see comment on Luke 13:30, above, and also 16:15).

As I pointed out in my comment above, I don't think it is possible to take the whole Bible seriously, owing to its self - contradictory nature.