As complex societies emerged, brains shrank because those previously unable to survive by wits alone could now scrape by with the help of others.
The observation led the researchers to a radical conclusion:
As complex societies emerged, the brain became smaller because people did not have to be as smart to stay alive.
The enduring objects that have given rise to our thinking of substances can be understood
as complex societies of such events that maintain a constant pattern over a long period of time.
I utterly reject the view of higher education as for purely personal benefit:
as a complex society we need those skilled in abstract problem - solving and with specialist knowledge.
Not exact matches
Knowledge of economic history is critical for good policy making because,
as valuable
as it is to understand models and theories, in real life policies have to be made in
societies that are
complex and have political and sociological considerations to take into account.
In the Enlightenment view of the world, ethical issues regularly get reduced to issues of civil liberties, which is increasingly being shown to be a far too simplistic category to guide
society in dealing with such
complex moral problems
as incest, abortion, divorce, and substance abuse.
The Qur» an, which was revealed almost fourteen centuries ago, and the Traditions concerning the Prophet who lived that long ago exclusively in a desert
society can not serve
as explicit guides for every situation which might arise centuries later, and especially in the
complex societies of the present day.
As seen from the perspective of science, evolution is simply a process involving the gradual emergence of more and more
complex entities and
societies.
A human person is an example of such a personal order, and one could extend this image to include larger and more
complex corpuscular
societies, such
as ethnic groups, geographical communities, or subcultures.
I shall return to how he suggests we understand value arising from what is being called, in his peculiar way a «
society,» but the point from Adventures of Ideas is clear enough: however we learn to appreciate the status of a
complex whole comprised of constituents, it must be construed in a manner which permits that
complex whole to serve in turn
as constituent within a larger and more
complex level of organic whole.
The Institute's proximity to the ruins of the Anasazi civilization provides an appropriate setting for the program's serious and admiring reflection on the successes of past
societies to function
as complex adaptive systems within their environments.
One way of viewing the religious crisis of our time is to see it not in the first instance
as a challenge to the intellectual cogency of Christianity, Buddhism, Islam, or other traditions, but
as the gradual erosion, in an ever more
complex and technological
society, of the feeling of reciprocity with nature, organic interrelatedness with the human community, and sensitive attention to the processes of lived experience where the realities designated by religious symbols and assertions are actually to be found, if they are found at all.
This is such
complex questions
as organized
society uses the same basic inner workings
as religion.
The membership of the
complex structured
society which is the electron is not, properly speaking, any of the subordinate
societies or nexus of the electron, such
as the personally ordered
society, the enduring object, which constitutes the «life» of the electron, but, rather, the individual actual occasions of which these subordinate entities are composed.
This conception must not only be able to deal with the individual in isolation and in terms of individual
complexes and aspects of his personality but also
as a whole person in relation to other persons and to
society.
It also says that electrons and protons are
societies, but it gives no indication
as to whether they are spatially thick, structured
societies (my view) or enduring objects (Cobb's view) except where Whitehead speculates about the dimly discerned «yet more ultimate actual entities — this could be taken to imply that electrons and protons are
complex, made up of distinct types of subordinate entities, and this would support my claim that electrons and protons are structured
societies.
So the point of Whitehead's example in the above passage would be that in talking about the membership of the
complex structured
society which is a total man, in the ordinary sense of the term, one is referring not to a subordinate
society, such
as the enduring object which is the life, or soul, of the man, but to all the individual actual occasions in all the subordinate
societies and subordinate nexus which make up the man.
He is, rather, a very
complex structured
society which sustains, among many other
societies, a regnant, personally ordered, subordinate
society (an enduring object) which Whitehead refers to
as «the soul of which Plato spoke» (Adventures of Ideas 267 — see also pp. 263 - 264 for a clear statement of the distinction between «the ordinary meaning of the term «man,» which includes the total bodily man, and the narrow sense of «man,» where «man» is considered a person in Whitehead's technical sense, i.e.,
as the regnant, personally ordered
society which he identifies
as his equivalent of Descartes» thinking substance and Plato's soul).
In a
complex society such
as ours, it would be impossible to detail all of the images and symbols that go into creating its commonality.
However, if he remains true to his Divine Will
as reflected in the Law, it will not be sufficient for him to raise up religious truth in a sporadic fashion without any line of direction or fulfilment: «if God is the Environer of the soul of man, then from the very beginning of man there must be, within his personality and within the
complex of human
society a God - evoked and God directed line of spiritual truth, and good, and spiritual authority».
Lumen gentium teaches that «Christ... has founded... his Holy Church»; «has made her visible framework... the dispenser of grace and truth»; «she is a
society equipped with hierarchical organs and the Mystical Body of Christ, a visible assembly and a spiritual fellowship»; «we must not think of the Church
as two substances, but a single,
complex reality, the compound of a human and a divine element» (n. 8).
The building block electronic and protonic actual occasions are, in the case of human beings, swept into vastly more
complex, Chinese box - like sets of containing
societies within which there are social levels that can be identified with cells, others which answer to Aristotle's levels of tissues and organs, and which finally are presided over by what Whitehead refers to
as the regnant nexus, a social thread of
complex temporal inheritance which, Whitehead suggests, wanders from part to part of the brain, is the seat of conscious direction of the organism
as a whole, and answers to what in Plato and Aristotle is called the soul.
(With «earth» again understood
as comprehensive of nature and
society together
as a single,
complex community that is full of life but «under house arrest,» to recall the graphic description of Boutros Boutros - Ghali at the Earth Summit of 1992).
Following Whitehead, we see the appearance of mass in the world
as a fundamental element in the way that a
complex, resilient
society might approach reality and survive.
And this is occurring on a grand scale,
as a large number of former closed
societies find themselves part of one vast,
complex and (
as yet) embryonic open
society.
Naturally, he does not object to the use of such terminology
as «body» and «soul,» provided it is remembered that the human body is essentially a vastly
complex society of actual occasions and the human soul is the unifying, purposive agency of the body.
As a totality existing in its own right, of course, the
society in question may be part of a still greater
society or more
complex field of activity.
Here the question arises
as to the grounds for distinguishing between simple occasions and
complex groups of occasions (nexuses,
societies, events, etc.), particularly insofar
as these form the data for a novel occasion.
Instead of disintegrating the human person into a swarm of entities that are then reunited into the — dubious — unity of a bare «
society,» the simpler and more realistic solution ought to lie in conceiving the person, steadfastly and from the beginning,
as one entity, even though a
complex one,
as befits Whitehead's starting point.
As God is the Environer of the soul of man, then from the beginning of man there must be, within his personality and within the
complex of human
society, a God - evoked and God - directed line of spiritual truth, goodness and spiritual authority, with the fullness of development within it.
In a
complex society such
as ours, it would be impossible to detail all of the images and symbols that go into creating its myths.
Assuming that Hartshorne does not identify the person entirely with his bodily
society, then the person's own linear unity, however «fed» by his bodily
society, can hardly be understood
as a constant by - product of the
complex bodily
society.
But it strains credulity to believe that all sectors of a
society as complex as our own» education, politics, the media, advertising, music, scholarship, psychology, medicine, movies, fashion, toy makers, and (unkindest cut of all) many women themselves» are conspiring and colluding against all women everywhere, which means, in many instances, against themselves.
Whitehead seems to mean by a systematic geometry that it is a geometry representing a structure of uniform curvature yet not a geometry identified
as one of the particular uniform metric geometries.6 Further, this systematic geometry, exemplified within the presented duration, is taken to be a defining characteristic of the «geometrical»
society, a basic member of a hierarchy of
societies comprising the present cosmic epoch (PR 148 - 59K Thus Whitehead explains that the perceptive mode of presentational immediacy is of importance, for it exhibits a»...
complex of systematic mathematical relations which participate in all the nexuses of our cosmic epoch, in the widest meaning of that term.»
The
complex and pressing demands made upon Protestantism by the rising industrial and urban
society have brought with them a renewed awareness of the role of the church
as a ministering body in which both lay and ordained ministers are called
as servants of the gospel, not only in the church but also in the world.
It has created an increasingly
complex -
society in which the individual has found himself
as part of a multiplicity rather than a unity, associated with many different groups and institutions of which the church is merely one.
Cells in their turn are organized into
complex societies of cells, such
as vegetables and animal bodies.
Finally, there are those in varying degrees like Rowan Williams who inhabit mainstream orthodoxy, though without appealing to one dominant theological voice; they engage in intensive conversation and critical discourse and appreciate the «celebratory» mode; their main concern is not so much cognitive coherence or invulnerability
as fulfillment of a range of
complex responsibilities within academy, church and
society.
Ordinary objects of our experience, such
as rocks and tables, are composed of many strands of enduring objects; and the story of planetary evolution focuses on the careers of incredibly
complex organisms which may be analyzed into
societies with sub-
societies of many kinds.
«If we choose to have a federal government that tries to solve every problem, then
as long
as society keeps growing more
complex, government must keep on growing right along with it.
The human body is intricately
complex, and therefore we find in it specialized forms of order such
as societies and structured
societies.
Since no
society can exist without some measure of coercion
as well
as some measure of persuasion, Christian teaching on the proper relation of these two forms of power has been
complex and diverse.
This
complex society may be said to begin with conception, or with a late stage of embryonic development, or with early childhood, depending upon the purpose which determines what one takes
as its defining characteristic.
The building of the Church
as a community with
complex organizational structure, with manifold functions and leaders, with various responsibilities to the
society around it, can easily degenerate into the building of religious clubs, of sororities and fraternities and of national associations for the promotion of good causes, if the understanding of the Church's purpose, of its responsibility to God, of the nature and action of God, of man and his history, of the meaning of the Church's work in all the
complex of human activity and of the interrelation of the various aspects of its work are lost to view.
Just
as the relationships between sport and
society are more
complex than one might think possible, so the place of sport in student minds over the past 30 years is at least equally
complex.
«Explaining
complex brain science in a clear - cut manner, Steinberg offers parents and educators practical advice,
as well
as innovative ideas about how
society can better support its youth and adapt to the times... This is a convincing and eloquent call for change.»
Embedding his economic theory into a wider account of a modern
society, undergirded by the moral philosophy and psychology developed in the Theory, Smith was keenly aware that there is no such thing
as a «market» in the abstract, and that political and economic processes are interdependent in many and
complex ways.
The classical «negative liberty» notion, where individual freedoms were a prerequisite for economic prosperity, met a sorry end
as Britain's increasingly
complex society required new action from the state.
Interactive virtual reality (VR) brings medical images to life on screen, showing interventional radiologists a patient's unique internal anatomy to help physicians effectively prepare and tailor their approach to
complex treatments, such
as splenic artery aneurysm repair, according to new research being presented today at the
Society of Interventional Radiology's 2018 Annual Scientific Meeting.
It is a rule that lies at the core of studying animal and plant behavior, and human
society should be looked at no differently,
as even technologically
complex societies are still governed by EROI.