Sentences with phrase «as human error»

Well, as human error fades from the transportation system, a lot of really great benefits will result.

Although there have been significant advances in the technology used on airplanes and helicopters, mechanical failure, as well as human error, continue to cause aviation accidents.

Since we support EDI (electronic invoicing), orders and receiving invoices can be communicated immediately between stores and warehouses to eliminate paper waste, as well as human error, assisting with retail and warehouse automations.

The government may be tempted to pass this off as human error.

«Before it was the count that humans kept, and I know — especially for me — there is such a thing as human error,» Miner said.

He believes that a wider presence of self - driving technologies will reduce the risks associated with driving, as human error is responsible for more than 90 percent of all car crashes.

Heidi Shey, a senior analyst at Forrester who studies the cyber insurance space, says insurers are in an excited «land - grab» state, gobbling up as many customers as they can because insurers believe most businesses will not file a claim, or there could be a cyber event that doesn't get covered due to an exemption, such as human error, credit card fraud, or email fraud.

Not exact matches

That is defensible only if one is certain that the baseline level of possible robotic error in civilian protection exceeds that baseline level of human error... I, for one, would not bet against the possibility that for some military applications, we will some day come to see mere human judgment as guaranteeing an unacceptable level of indiscriminate and disproportionate violence.

Efficiency will skyrocket as resources are more specifically tailored to an office's needs and human error plays a smaller role in business.

Accounting software can not only help you reduce human errors in your calculations, but it can help you gain insights into your business that you couldn't see in paper form — such as generating sales forecasts for the next quarter, determining which items are overstocked, and pinpointing your least profitable service.

Why build a car that commandeers the brakes and wheel if not to eliminate that pesky statistical variable known as «human error» — which is to say, the fallibility that makes us all kin?

Joined by the other three members of the court's liberal wing, Justice Stevens said the majority had committed a grave error in treating corporate speech the same as that of human beings.

I think it is difficult to know where the next crisis will come from, and, in general, it is better to have a system that is safe from errors in judgment and surprise than it is to try and avoid errors in judgment and surprises because as along as you are dealing with human beings, there will be errors and surprises.

You accept your own risk that the internet or other online communications media may not perform as intended as a result of human, mechanical or other error, despite the efforts of Leith Wheeler, you, or any third party.

In industries like accounting where human workers handle and manage tasks such as verifying records and confirming the truthfulness of transactions, it is possible that human error or individuals with ill incentives manipulate records or create fraudulent records that are not an accurate representation of transaction history.

The bad news is that human society is a never - ending comedy of errors in which our hopes and dreams play out as farce.

@Chuckles I was not being hostile, but am just trying to point out that you are basically willing to conflate any similar cognitive errors such as we have as humans as being significant in any way in religious terms, should it happen that we encounter some alien species that also has idiots who think imaginary stuff is real.

And it shouldn't come as any suprise, I mean, we're all human and prone to error.

When speaking this way about Scripture, most theologians are about to say that as a result of the Bible being a human book, it should not surprise us to discover that the Bible has errors.

The second error in viewing nature as inexhaustible resource is that nature is not simply a resource for human beings.

It seems that ultimately, what this does is set humans up as judge over Scripture to determine what is «true» and what is «error.»

This is why all the terrible things I have experienced in the name of love, God and the church are not simply written off as little slips or slights in human error, but significant manifestations of a deeper malevolence that need brutally honest detection and committed treatment.

It meant that «the light of the Holy Spirit, which is given in a particular way to the pastors of the church,» as Humanae vitae describes it, does not guarantee lack of error or replace human analysis.

Faustus Socinus and his followers were the first to break, not only with trinitarianism and the worship of Jesus as literally divine but above all with the one - sided view of God as immutable and merely infinite, also with the tragic error of omnipotence in a sense contradictory of freedom in human beings.

And in doing so it leads to a serious error in logic: after abstracting so completely from the experiential quality that pervades all of nature it sets forth the desiccated end - product of its abstracting as though it were reality - itself and everything else a mere coloring by human sensory projection.

The incongruities themselves illustrate the manner in which through trial and error men came to apprehend the truth; and the defects and limitations of which we are aware serve as background to the growing light which, as if evoked by them, shone upon the human scene.

Facts, or evidence, seem incontrovertible only in the light, or dark as the case may be, of human judgment, which is the only source of error on this planet.

John Cobb, Jr. in his book, A Christian Natural Theology, 1 makes this same error in his discussion of life after death as a part of a chapter on the human soul.

By «perspective» I mean the realization that things will never be perfect In this world, that the ultimate good is unobtainable, that there is no such thing as a human cause or human institution without error and sinfulness, that only God deserves our ultimate loyalty.

The first is that a human institution subject to all the sins and errors of mortality is here absolutized as the infallible spokesman for God.

I propose to examine this error and to show that in Niebuhr and Brunner's thought there is an inverted romanticism in which all the natural conditions of human existence are erroneously regarded as barriers to the Kingdom of God.

But, he said, «the latter history of this culture is not so much a debate between these two schools of thought as a rebellion of romanticism, materialism and psychoanalytic psychology against the errors of rationalism, whether idealistic or naturalistic, in its interpretation of human nature.

A strong case has been made by F. J. E. Woodbridge that Plato not only does not seriously regard his «perfect state» as realizable, but that he means to make us see the error of imposing perfection too rigorously on human fallibility.3 Edward Bellamy's Looking Backward illustrates the utopia which becomes a persuasive call to radical social reforms.4 It also illustrates one of the functions of utopian thought as a medium of realistic criticism of the present.

If in his instruction as a human being, without specific revelation, he ever was in error, he was immediately brought back to the truth through a revelation (Surah IV, 106 - 13; VIII, 67; IX, 43, 113).

By inerrant I mean, as the word suggests, without error; such that if God were interested in directing an inerrant account of the life of Andrea Yates it simply could not say «the woman heard God say that she should drown her children in the bathtub» but would have to qualify it with «the woman believed that she heard...» Without that qualifier, it would not be inerrant, it would not be «untrue but historically accurate» if God did not actually say it then saying that he intervened in human history at that point would be incorrect.

Even Mr. Neuhaus seems to accept that as a human being, a Pope can make errors, pursue mistaken policies, or fail in his duty.

In this respect Enns, an evangelical, is close to Catholic theology, expressed by Pius XII in Divino Afflante Spiritu: «Just as the substantial Word of God became like men in every respect except sin, so too the words of God, expressed in human languages, became like human language in every respect except error.»

It is a grave error to make no distinction between them and our flesh - and - blood neighbor whom they hide behind and use as a human shield.

A first flash of illumination, intuitively accepted despite the risk of error; and as the intuition was increasingly confirmed by observation and experiment, it came to be embodied in the inherited core of human consciousness.

Finally, the credibility of science itself has been shown — once again, and as if we needed a reminder — to be subject to such ordinary human failings as ego defense, the willingness to bend the truth rather than admit error, and the temptation to disparage and insult one's opponents.

This may be a shortsighted error on our part, but, with the exception of a few saintly souls, human beings generally have not thought of themselves as having any obligations to nonhuman nature.

As such it is always subject to errors that can be controlled but not governed entirely by practical and / or socially established evaluative or critical methods.18 The indispensable factor of interpretation in the dynamic processes of semiosis even leads to the idea that there is a generic form of imagination in physical becoming, in addition to a primary or radical form in human perception, a consideration that would indeed justify calling creativity the category of the ultimate, just as Whitehead maintainAs such it is always subject to errors that can be controlled but not governed entirely by practical and / or socially established evaluative or critical methods.18 The indispensable factor of interpretation in the dynamic processes of semiosis even leads to the idea that there is a generic form of imagination in physical becoming, in addition to a primary or radical form in human perception, a consideration that would indeed justify calling creativity the category of the ultimate, just as Whitehead maintainas Whitehead maintains.

I'm just suggesting you accept that human nature and error have played at least some part not just in other religions, but in Christian theology and scripture as well.

For now, my only point is that there does not seem to be any passage in the Bible which defends the doctrine of Inspiration as it was taught to me: that the Holy Spirit guided human authors to compose and record through their personalities God's selected message without error in the words of the original documents.

Nevertheless, if Christ's humanity did not diminish his divine nature as being the Son of God and without sin, it follows that human authorship of the Bible need not diminish its divine nature as being the Word of God and without error.

This error remains intuitively plausible and has a decent cultural pedigree, so therefore those who make it should not be dismissed as utterly irrational or evil, even though they may seem so from the viewpoint of one who bears in mind the facts of human development.

@AE — I have had my human spirit as a guide, my morals based on the golden rule, and the wisdom (and errors) made by the many that have preceded me.

I found deep wisdom (and errors) in all of the Great Religious Traditions; but nowhere did I find as great an affirmation of the human person as the Judeo - Christian Tradition and especially in Christian mystery of the Incarnation.

A Catholic principle becomes ever clearer at this time, and Pius XII expressed it in these words: «Just as the substantial Word of God became like men in every respect except sin, so too the words of God, expressed in human languages, became like human language in every respect except error.»

Plus, the act allows for some permissible variations in nutrient content: «Such disclosures shall be treated as having a reasonable basis even if such disclosures vary from actual nutrient content, including but not limited to variations in serving size, inadvertent human error in formulation or preparation of menu items, variations in ingredients or other reasonable variations.»