Sentences with phrase «as modern men»

Online dating is very popular today, as modern men and women are ready to discover the world to meet new In chemistry, a soap is a salt of a fatty acid.

Online dating is very popular today, as modern men and women are ready to discover the world to meet new

In consequence, we preach as ourselves — we preach, that is, as modern men and women who yet believe the gospel and who have been commissioned by the Church to preach it.

However, as modern men and women we can not long permit ourselves such pangs of unease — and for many reasons.

For the fact is, as modern men, we stand between two scientific visions of man and his world.

We must, of course, take seriously the rules of probability that we inherit as modern men and women.

We can not escape the kind of question that we as modern men and women put to material like this; and «did it happen?»

As modern men and women — to the degree that we are modern — we believe in nothing.

As a modern man / I am a little flawed.

Just as modern man is not tainted by the supposed «sins» of Adam and Eve.

As a modern man and woman need diapers for their baby, so did Adam and Eve.

As a modern man, Bill is worried of his survival and safety.

As a modern man, armed with said Move controller, I was no less perplexed and fascinated by the possibilities — the great discovery of the potential to create coupled with the terrible burden of making some sense of the opportunity, emerging from the cave with fresh experience for the trouble.

This global warming stuff I'm convinced will go down in history as modern man's greatest blunder.

«It shows that these forgotten people of the»90s had many of the same concerns as modern man, such as b - days, and slow periods at work,» Caspari said.

Not exact matches

As intriguing as it is to watch Don Draper roam the hallways of his beautifully appointed 1960's advertising agency in Mad Men, we'd probably agree that we're glad the modern workspace has evolved into something that better fits our humanity both in and out of the officAs intriguing as it is to watch Don Draper roam the hallways of his beautifully appointed 1960's advertising agency in Mad Men, we'd probably agree that we're glad the modern workspace has evolved into something that better fits our humanity both in and out of the officas it is to watch Don Draper roam the hallways of his beautifully appointed 1960's advertising agency in Mad Men, we'd probably agree that we're glad the modern workspace has evolved into something that better fits our humanity both in and out of the office.

Billing itself as the subscription service for the «modern man,» each subscription box goes for $ 25.

Lewis and Klein — no friends of global capitalism — portray the workers as revolutionaries, sticking it to the Man by doing an end - run around the evils of modern business.

«We all have modern human resource management systems, but as a CEO are you willing to step up and say I pay men and women the same?»

For example, why women were portrayed (in modern TV anyways) as being as interested in sex as men.

If they would get rid of the term «10 Commandments» and call them say «Good Advice for God fearing Men and and women» or «a philosophy for modern living», they wouldn't be stigmatized as they are.

Show me the modern textbooks that present «Nebraska Man» as a hominid fossil, show me or admit once and for all that you creationists often simply lie to try to support your point of view.

Imagining Tocquevillean man transferred to modern California is nearly as challenging.

In his later interview on the occasion of the Jefferson Lecture, he speaks of modern man as deranged, the literal sense of that term most appropriate to the Cartesian dislocation of intellect that has effected our displacement from the proper range of our being in the world.

Nietzsche's scorn for «modern ideas» made a profound impression on his admirers: «This book [Beyond Good and Evil],» he said, «is a criticism of modernity, embracing the modern sciences, arts, even politics, together with certain indications as to a type that would be the reverse of modern man, for as little like him as possible: a noble, yea - saying man.»

Certainly not because we can always appropriate their work for modern theological purposes, but for this reason: «We remember it, as a man remembers the profound intuitions he had as an adolescent.

One understanding of human nature common to the modern era sees man as standing both above and outside nature (after Descartes, as a sort disembodied rational being), and nature itself as raw material — sometimes more pliable, sometimes less — for furthering human ambition (an instrumentalist post — Francis Bacon view of nature as a reality not simply to be understood but to be «conquered» and used to satisfy human desires).

A plethora of books and seminars have been built around treating the Household Codes as God - inspired marriage advice for modern couples, often working off the statement that «God tells wives to respect their husbands because men need respect, and God tells husbands to love their wives because women need love.»

While employing the Hegelian categories of the «universal» and the «objective» as a means of understanding the new reality created by modern man, Kierkegaard came to understand the modern consciousness as the product of a Faustian choice.

But, theologically, the world which modern man knows as «chaos» or «nothingness» is homologous with the world that eschatological faith knows as «old aeon» or «old creation» — both worlds are stripped of every fragment of positive meaning and value.

First, its premisses concerning society and modern man are pseudoscientific: for example, the affirmation that man has become adult, that he no longer needs a Father, that the Father - God was invented when the human race was in its infancy, etc.; the affirmation that man has become rational and thinks scientifically, and that therefore he must get rid of the religious and mythological notions that were appropriate when his thought processes were primitive; the affirmation that the modern world has been secularized, laicized, and can no longer countenance religious people, but if they still want to preach the kerygma they must do it in laicized terms; the affirmation that the Bible is of value only as a cultural document, not as the channel of Revelation, etc. (I say «affirmation» because these are indeed simply affirmations, unrelated either to fact or to any scientific knowledge about modern man or present - day society.)

As they see it, their attitude represents an innovation in Christianity, an acknowledgment of the duty, imposed by faith, to be in the midst of men, and a response to the opening given Christianity for witness in the modern world.

Modern man can know faith only as a «scandal»; faith is wholly other than the reality which we most deeply are.

Even though the title «Son of God» is used in the account of the Baptism, presumably the origin of Jesus» Messianic consciousness — as many modern scholars interpret the passage — nevertheless the whole idea of his acceptance of death is formulated in terms of the heavenly Man who has power and authority upon earth, (Mark 2:10, 28) who fulfills what is written of him, who dies and rises again, and is to come in glory as the supreme advocate or judge.

According to Lewis, modern man lives in a tiny windowless universe, his boundaries narrowed to too small a focus.75 Through such play experiences as the reading of stories - when one could experience life «in a sense «for fun,» and with [his] feet on the fender» - Lewis believed that modern man could perhaps recapture a sense of his distant horizons, much as he once had.76 For Lewis, a story was the embodiment of, or mediation of, the «more.»

And the finality of Jesus Christ, in whom true God is active for the wholeness of men, consists in his endless fertility; as a modern saint has put it, «He is adequate,» and his adequacy is not for us alone but for all men everywhere and at every time.

Paul Tillich's theology of culture, Rudolf Bultmann's demythologization, today's death - of - God theology are all adaptations of Christianity to what is conceived of as the nature of man and modern society.

The real content of many so - called modern difficulties are as old as the eternal hills, as old as human pride, as hoary as the «non serviam» which was uttered by the first man and has been re-echoed since down the centuries.

For this reason alone, I regard John Henry Newman's The Development of Christian Doctrine as the most important of all modern Catholic theological works, or at least, the most significant until Teilhard de Chardin's The Phenomenon of Man.

When you look at the New Testament model, Jeremy, as you have done in this series... one cultural difference that I think most people fail to really account for is that those men, Paul and others who worked, generally worked in a modern day trade equivalent.

Jesus expresses no conception of a human ideal, no thought of a development of human capacities, no idea of something valuable in man as such, no conception of the spirit in the modern sense.

If modern Christianity has patterned itself after Jesus, then the Jesus we present to the world is not the Jesus who rejected the offers of self - reliance, control over others, and glory before men, but is the «Jesus» who has accepted such values and now holds them up as virtues.

Heidegger's presentation of the possibilities of human existence suggests that they are applicable to man as such, and not, say, only to modern European man.

If a new meaning of nature has pervaded modern history, an autonomous world existing in - itself, then so likewise man himself no longer appears as the image of a transcendent Creator.

We easily regard as the defeat and regression of the Church in modern times what is actually only the social manifestation of a state which has always existed, even in the so - called good old days, because even then people, on the average, had but little faith, hope and love of God and men.

Modern man can only define himself as a being in history (zoon historikon), a being with a past, a present, and a future..

The text of the modern day Bible has surely gone through a similar ordeal through the passage of time, as many many many men have had their hands on shaping the text that we read today.

The Catholic understands this concept of the solitary conscience very well, provided it is not contaminated by modern individualism which diminishes man's stature and is, indeed, no longer regarded as his permanent inheritance.

«Modern man is the first to live so fundamentally out of the future,» says Gerhard Kruger, «that for him the new as such has a magical attraction.»

That said, if it brings someone to Christ then that's good — one trait of a believer is a sincere desire for the word, and it is very likely that the Christian will eventually gravitate toward a more accurate translation, just as many of us have done who were initially enamored of Good News for Modern Man (TEV) and other such paraphrases from the past.