As school finance litigation evolved, those seeking equity began to widen their challenge to include educational facilities.
Not exact matches
In the equity - based
litigation of the 1970s and 1980s, researchers investigated and courts intervened in deep - seated education -
finance issues of public policy significance, such
as school funding schemes that exacerbated existing socioeconomic disparities.
These efforts invariably provided occasion for
litigation and sometimes,
as in the case of
school finance reform, worked primarily through it.
As John Dinan shows in «
School Finance Litigation: The Third Wave Recedes» in From Schoolhouse to Courthouse, state courts have grown increasingly weary, and wary, of being drawn into these political quagmires.
Grounded in those state constitutional provisions, many state supreme courts have, typically
as part of a decision having to do with
school finance litigation, recognized an individual right to education.
Domenick has served on the Board of Directors of the ARC Association and a mid-cap technology company,
as Chairman Emeritus of the Claims and
Litigation Management Alliance, Board Member of the Claims and
Litigation Management Alliance, Adjunct Professor of Insurance Law and Regulation at Temple Law
School, Member of the Board of the Business
School of NJIT, where he also serves
as an Adjunct Professor of Corporate
Finance, Member of the Association of Corporate Growth and Member of the American Bar Association Mergers and Acquisitions Committee.
Certainly the NAACP,
as I understand its position before this Court, denied that it had managed or controlled the
litigation which it had urged its members or others to bring, disclaimed any desire to do so, and denied any adverse effects upon its operations if lawyers representing clients in
school desegregation or other
litigation financed by the NAACP represented only those clients and were under no obligation to follow the dictates of the NAACP in the conduct of that
litigation.
Some of our notable entertainment and media attorneys are: John Quinn, General Counsel of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, who has also represented entertainment and media clients in a number of high profile cases; Kathleen Sullivan, the former Dean of Stanford Law
School, First Amendment scholar, and nationally renowned appellate advocate, who heads the firm's appellate practice group; Bob Raskopf, an expert in the sports, entertainment and media bars in New York, who is perhaps best known for his work on behalf of professional sports leagues and teams, newspapers and publishers; Claude Stern, who has represented a broad array of leading software developers, videogame manufacturers, online publishers and other media clients in all forms of intellectual property
litigation, including copyright, patent, trade secret, trademark, and licensing disputes; Bruce Van Dalsem, who has tried and resolved disputes for studios, producers and performing artists in the film, television, music and
finance businesses, securing a top five verdict in California based on the misappropriation of a film library; Gary Gans, an expert litigator in motion picture
financing, production and distribution disputes,
as well
as copyright and idea theft cases, who has been named in 2012 by The Hollywood Reporter
as one of America's «Top Entertainment Attorneys;» Jeff McFarland, who has litigated entertainment related cases for more than 20 years, including cases involving motion picture and television series profits, video game licenses, idea theft and the «seven year rule;» and Michael Williams, who represents a satellite exhibitor and other media clients in trademark, copyright, patent, antitrust and other commercial
litigation.