Sentences with phrase «as the phrase implies»

Trading 15/16 for a «ready to contribute player» would be insane, as that phrasing implies the floor is below Kemba.
As the phrase implies, there is some risk involved, which could include criticism about one's statements and credentials.

Not exact matches

That phrase implies that Buffett knows his own risk tolerance, and that he is scaling into stocks gradually as their prices decline and their expected long - term returns increase.
A reader might take the phrase «the primal phenomenon» to mean or imply some fundamental consciousness of the self, as though the first and most apparent thing of all is «our own existence as experiencing subjects or selves.»
The Report also says that «assent to formularies and the use of liturgical language in public worship should be understood as signifying general acceptance without implying detailed assent to every phrase or proposition thus employed».3
It isn't meant as a criticism of atheists, but of religious elitism and exclusion, as the phrase «being coerced into passively approving» implies.
On your list, the way you phrased those tenants to me implied a certain meaning of them, as your can see in my response to Ann B. Apparently, I misunderstood.
All this is no more than is implied in the phrase of the kerygma which describes Him as «going about doing good, because God was with Him,» and it affords a necessary and valuable supplement to the Marcan picture of the strong Son of God, and the Matthaean picture of the royal Lawgiver.
Well, that would be an incorrect way for me to phrase the question, as it implies a duality that I do not believe exists in God (God vs. man).
Even the way you are phrasing this implies that Christians who refuse to consider all the options of all the other gods available to them and all the other heaven / hell pictures available to them paints this refusal as a moral failure, which it very well might be in a limited sense, if we are to regard intellectual laziness as a moral failure.
On the other hand, if «historical» implies that we possess material that gives us an entirely accurate and completely reliable account of the life and work of Jesus, such as we might have about Julius Caesar or Napoleon, it is an inexact and misleading phrase.
«Fine tune» is a deceptive phrase, as it implies a being doing the «tuning», which is what confuses Chad.
Now to Craighead's first claim, Hartshorne has responded directly that it is contradictory to affirm the being of nonbeing or the possibility of no possibility; likewise, it is contradictory to imply with phrases such as «There is nothing» or «There might have been nothing» the spatiality or temporality of that with no location in space or time (CSPM 58, 245, 283; LP 149; WP 80; NTT 83f; DR 73; PS I: 25, 26; IDE 88 - 93).
Occasional remarks are found such as «before there reigned any king over the children of Israel» (Genesis 36:31), which seem to imply that from the standpoint of the writer the monarchy had already been established; and «the Canaanite was then in the land» (Genesis 12:6, 13:7), which implied that it was being written after Hebrew occupation; and finally repeated instances of the use of the phrase «on the other side of the Jordan,» in reference to events occurring in the lifetime of Moses, which led scholars to doubt if Moses could have been the author at least of the whole of the Pentateuch.
I also meant to say that when I read this post, I immediately thought of another phrase: «No offense, but...» Just as prefacing a statement with, «Don't judge me» puts the listener on the defensive (since it appears that the speaker is expecting judgment), so does saying, «No offense» to somebody... it implies that you are going to say something rude to them.
These phrases, while not abrasive, are still implying that a child is having thoughts that are «wrong» or «bad,» when actually, anyone can have whatever thoughts they desire — what we as parents really want is for children to be able to discern which behavior would be more aligned with the values we hope to be passing down to them.
The phrasing of the question implies the answer is «yes», hoping to instill this as a fact in the casual reader's mind, but the actual answer is invariably «no» (this is known as Betteridge's Law of Headlines).
The phrase «we will need your consent for operation» was sometimes mangled into «we need your consent for operating (such as machinery),» which implies that, as you wait for an OR to open up, the management would appreciate it if you could put in a shift at the loading dock.
These three words are sometimes used together as a phrase, implying regret: A writer should have hired an editor, would have used some beta readers, or could have spent more time on self - editing in order to dodge the poor reviews he's received.
Advertising that included such phrases as «see what lenders see,» it's argued, implied that banks, card issuers, and more will see and directly use the credit scores Equifax, TransUnion, and Experian generate.
It is worth noting that the settlement agreement criticizes the use of phrases such as «save money» to imply that consolidating loans decreases the cost of the loans.
Note that «Treasury Shares, Ending Balance» could not be a standard label but rather is a period end label, so as this example implies, the rule of consistent phrasing applies across different roles.
This phrase implies the self - consciously provisional nature of the narrative: the absence here of many of the permanent collection's most iconic works from this era makes clear that this is intended as an array of interesting things that happened during that decade — in other words, not an authoritative history of»60s art.
Employing the common phrase, «thinking the same,» Ruscha takes the assumed commonality of thought implied, and lays the text across two fields of disparate color, pink and green, clashing against both each other as well as the phrase that joins them.
The document — which administration officials have neither acknowledged or rejected as authentic — has elements guaranteed to inflame folks ranging from Rush Limbaugh (the mention of efforts to «produce a global regime to combat climate change») to environmental groups pushing for concrete commitments on restricting greenhouse gases (a phrase implying that increasing perception of United States engagement is the goal).
The key unknowns here being «if,» the amount of the «heat,» and the missing but implied phrase «as far as we know and assuming that we have accurately modelled all relevant elements of the system.»
The phrase «or disappears entirely» may be construed as an implied research bias and frustrated intent seeking confirmation of an expected analytical result indicative of «Global Warming.»
[note] The latter part of this paragraph has been amended from the original published version, following an email conversation between the reviewer and the author, acknowledging a concern that the original phrasing, and use of the word «smearing», was potentially misleading insofar as it implied any intentionality.
This point is not drawn out much in the judgment in Sandwell, which focuses more on resolving apparent ambiguity in the phrase «actions founded on simple contract» by reference to extraneous sources, such as the Law Revision Committee report of 1936 preceding LA 1939, which noted that a «simple contract» would include a «quasi-contract» (this in accordance with the then prevailing «implied contract» theory of restitution).
However, you should phrase the question carefully, as you don't want to imply that you don't really want to work in audit.
The phrases need not be complete sentences as the applicant is the implied subject, and short, direct phrasing are desirable.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z