Sentences with phrase «as the temps rise»

There were about 10 really scary minutes, as the temp rose till it maxed out the guage.

U.S. Seeing Red as Temps Rise Derelict Oil Wells May Be Major Methane Emitters

Even as the temps rise, my go to summer outfit is a pair of shorts and a sweater.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 As the temps rise above 60 degrees, I can't help but daydream about the beach days that are right around the corner!

The crochet look is definitely on trend for summer and will keep you cool as the temps rise.

As the temps rise, I like to pair a chunky necklace and leave off the sweater.

«Glaciers in higher colder mountainous regions will be slower to melt even as temps rise, the lower tundra areas will respond more quickly to such changes and this is shown by the quicker responses in tree line to the lesser warming periods like the MWP at ground level further north from him, and not just fossil remains but old farming settlements uncovered, and so on.»

Not exact matches

David, I've been one of those silent readers for some time now, even as I watched, solely through your own telling, the tempest that was rising in your former call.

Also, I did the final rise for about 4 hrs in fridge, then 1.5 outside as it came to room temp and a little extra.

Note: If your pot is too big the sugar syrup will be more likely to burn as the temp will rise too quickly and the thermometer will have trouble reading correctly.

As the warm weather sets in, we have our favorites for mom AND baby to stay cool despite the rising temps.

Dan Kellog, an engineer (not climate scientist) on another blog, has raised the issue of once a glacier has melted away, the local temps could rise dramatically (and perhaps, averaged altogether around the world as glaciers melt away, increase the rate of global warming).

Well like you said, it's all uphill from here as far as length of days and rising temps.

I've had this outfit on constant rotation for the last few weeks as the temps and humidity rise here in the South.

As pointed out in an article by Anna - Louise Jackson, Steve Mathews, and Anthony Feld in Bloomberg Finance, «Temporary Work Demand Rises as Companies Avoid Commitments: Jobs,» the number of workers needed at firms like Kelly Services (NASDAQ: KELYA) and other temp agencies has increased due to market demand, now almost $ 30 billion, for on - demand labor, both blue collar and executivAs pointed out in an article by Anna - Louise Jackson, Steve Mathews, and Anthony Feld in Bloomberg Finance, «Temporary Work Demand Rises as Companies Avoid Commitments: Jobs,» the number of workers needed at firms like Kelly Services (NASDAQ: KELYA) and other temp agencies has increased due to market demand, now almost $ 30 billion, for on - demand labor, both blue collar and executivas Companies Avoid Commitments: Jobs,» the number of workers needed at firms like Kelly Services (NASDAQ: KELYA) and other temp agencies has increased due to market demand, now almost $ 30 billion, for on - demand labor, both blue collar and executive.

What if the artist took over the desolate Bell Labs Holmdel Complex and hired temps to pick tens of thousands rose petals to be captured as digital data?

Dan Kellog, an engineer (not climate scientist) on another blog, has raised the issue of once a glacier has melted away, the local temps could rise dramatically (and perhaps, averaged altogether around the world as glaciers melt away, increase the rate of global warming).

It might sound convincing to argue that steadily declining stratospheric temps coordinated with steadily rising tropospheric temps are a sure sign of significant CO2 involvement, but unfortunately for you the temperature of the troposphere has not steadily risen as expected — in fact, the negative correlation you want to see occurred only during a relatively brief 20 year period, from ca. 1979 - ca.

due to co2 we are already living in a greenhouse.Whatever one does in that greenhouse will remain in the greenhouse.INDUSTRIOUS HEAT will remain in the greenhouse instead of escaping into outer space; this is a far greater contributor to global warming than other factors and far more difficult to reduce without reducing economic activity.Like warm moist air from your mouth on cold mornings so melting antarctic ice will turn into cloud as it meets warm moist air from tropics the seas will not rise as antarctica is a huge cloud generator.A thick band of cloud around the earth will produce even temps accross the whole earth causing the wind to moderate even stop.WE should be preparing for this possible scenario»

It looks to me as though if the drop in temps in 1945 is.3 C then the subsequent rise to today must be around.4 -.5 C -LRB-?)

How do we know that it was the anthropogenics (commonly referred to as CO2 & the subject of the political Kyoto decision) that resulted in the closer estimation and not some competing / compensating errors in the natural model that do not show up until the 1970 - 2000 etc temp rises?

Refute the risk assessment that: given temps are rising, given they will continue to rise for 1k + years even if we had zero emissions starting today, given the risks of rapid climate change and long - term temp rises are real and threaten our ability to function as a society, etc., we should act to mitigate these threats, particularly since the actions to be taken will lead to a healthier existence for humanity even if AGW / ACC turns out to be wrong.

(showing the temp rise has changed this or that wind pattern and / or water flow around Australia, etc, etc) As I mentioned in post # 20, I'm trying to sort through the hype and come to RC to help me do that.

The rise of CO2 from 270ppm to now over 400ppm, the extent of equatorial and sub tropical deforestation, the soot deposits on the polar ice caps, the increase in atmospheric water vapour due to a corresponding increase in ocean temps and changes in ocean currents, the extreme ice albedo currently happening in the arctic etc, etc are all conspiring in tandem to alter the climate as we know it.

Of course HadCru, with less Arctic data, has somewhat less for a temp rise, as do the satellites.

Re glacial cycle CO2 and temp correlation, it is useful to remember that the timescale of that record is 100's of thousands of years, where as the CO2 rise today has occurred over ~ 100.

Now if you look at daily temp changes, when the sun raises the temp, the sun causes winds to change, hotter air to rise faster, and at night the winds die down as the earth cools off.

The earlier attempts (The global cooing scare of the 70s failed) to damage western industrial states failed as temps began rising as the ocean current phases went positive..

The three decadal surface temp trends behave as I imagine for periods when OHC rises quickly or is flattish.

His position: • No evidence of increasing lake clarity as a result of secchi measurements since 1946 • The interplay of stratification and plankton productivity are not «straightforward» • Challenges O'Reilly's assumption on the correlation of wind and productivity - the highest production is on the end of the lake with the lowest winds • A strong caution using diatoms as the productivity proxy (it is one of two different lake modes) • No ability to link climate change to productivity changes • More productivity from river than allowed for in Nature Geopscience article • Externally derived nutrients control productivity for a quarter of the year • Strong indications of overfishing • No evidence of a climate and fishery production link • The current productivity of the lake is within the expected range • Doesn't challenge recent temp increase but cites temperature records do not show a temperature rise in the last century • Phytoplankton chlorophylla seems to have not materially changed from the 1970s to 1990s • Disputes O'Reilly's and Verbug's claims of increased warming and decreased productivity • Rejects Verburgs contention that changes in phytoplankton biomass (biovolume), in dissolved silica and in transparency support the idea of declining productivity.

If there was a one off event such as an undersea eruption that warmed the ocean enough to leave a.5 c rise on the temp record, should your warming due to CO2 graph, restart at a point.5 c higher and then continue its climb?

If we can avoid knit picking on that one, the filtered hadCrut3 is actually rising more that unfiltered temps as would be expected with the intended filter.

And when the temps rise, turkeys don't grow as big and could even die from heat exhaustion or heat stroke.

Land temp rises more because it tends to be dry, especially in winter in higher latitudes, and thus lapse rate feedback (which is negative) doesn't play as large a role in reducing CO2 sensitivity.

The world wide surface station measured average daily rising temp and falling temp is 17.465460 F / 17.465673 F for the period of 1950 to 2010, not only is the falling temperatures slightly larger than rising temperatures, 17.4 F is only 50 % -70 % of a typical clear sky temperature swing of 25F to 30F, which can be as large as +40 F depending on location and humidity.

If not either the CO2 / temp relationship is wrong [I do not think so] or the effect of the CO2 rise is being variably effected by negative feedbacks such as increased cloud formation and albedo thus offsetting the CO2 related temperature rise.

If you look at things about 11,000 years ago, you see that temperatures were rising, then appeared to «ring» a little with temps dropping then rising, then temps drop again but not as far and recover to a higher level and then the «ringing» damps out and we have a nice smooth curve until about 4000 years ago and it begins to «ring» again.

Over the next year or so I began to see fewer references from AGW supporters to the Industrial Revolution as a start point and more emphasis on the spread of industry in the early 20th century, until I came across anti arguments pointing out that after the rise of temps to the third and fourth decades the world began to cool again, considerably.

As you say, convection uses up a lot of energy too and also counters the idea of radiative heat transfer as a big ticket item because «hot» CO2 molecules only remain so for a brief fraction of a second before they collide with N2 or O2 to warm that localised parcel of air; which then rises to attain equilibrium T somewhere higher and at a COLDER temp so no rad Transf!As you say, convection uses up a lot of energy too and also counters the idea of radiative heat transfer as a big ticket item because «hot» CO2 molecules only remain so for a brief fraction of a second before they collide with N2 or O2 to warm that localised parcel of air; which then rises to attain equilibrium T somewhere higher and at a COLDER temp so no rad Transf!as a big ticket item because «hot» CO2 molecules only remain so for a brief fraction of a second before they collide with N2 or O2 to warm that localised parcel of air; which then rises to attain equilibrium T somewhere higher and at a COLDER temp so no rad Transf!!!

Northern hemisphere temps will rise significantly in the next few months as the calendar moves inevitably to April, May, June and July?

The study does not show a rise in ocean temp so much as it attempts to model the variation of ocean temperature in order to pick out the forcings.

16 * Melting Glaciers and Rising Sea Levels Over the last century glaciers have been melting worldwide Antarctica ice sheet temp has risen 6 degrees As ice sheets and glaciers melt, sea level rises * Regional Temp Changes Changes in regional climate * Drought and Desertification Rising temps causes regions to warm and become very temp has risen 6 degrees As ice sheets and glaciers melt, sea level rises * Regional Temp Changes Changes in regional climate * Drought and Desertification Rising temps causes regions to warm and become very Temp Changes Changes in regional climate * Drought and Desertification Rising temps causes regions to warm and become very dry.

MWP 950 to 1250 Co2 lag over temp ~ 800 years Co2 began to rise ~ 1750 (950 plus 800 = 1750) 1250 plus 800 = 2050 therefore i predict co2 levels will continue to rise until 2050 where they will drop as per the LIA temps dropped.

Can it be coincidence that the 800 year half life is approximately the same as the 800 year lag of CO2 after temp rise?

as the correlation with dendros here doesn't look too bad and the current temps show NO RISE.

Still, at least for now, it doesn't appear that temps are rising as fast as projected.

Another point is that during these warmer periods the temps rose fairly rapidly along the same curve as today.

As for «melting in the arctic, droughts, shifting climate zones, increased ocean temps and sea level rise», these things have always happened and always will happen, as will their oppositeAs for «melting in the arctic, droughts, shifting climate zones, increased ocean temps and sea level rise», these things have always happened and always will happen, as will their oppositeas will their opposites.

If greenhouse was the cause LW outgoing would have to decrease more than shortwave outgoing increased and the outgoing LW should decrease even more as atmospheric temps don't rise.

Something else is responsible for the rise in temps, whether you characterise them as a jump or a trend.