Sentences with phrase «ask a question about something»

If he doesn't reciprocate and you still can't get him off your mind as a last resort you can send a casual message stating your name and asking him a question about something in his profile.

Ask a question about something in his profile and keep it short.

Find something in his profile that piqued your curiosity, ask him a question about something he wrote and then invite him to visit your profile.

You may want to try to ask her a question about something she wrote in her profile.

More often than not you have to ditch your plan, maybe because they didn't understand, or the internet was too slow or they were unresponsive or they asked questions about something else and led you in another direction.»

When I ask a question about something related to a work - in - progress, the answer is often, «I don't have time to deal with that flaw.

If your chosen subject is a friend, ask them a question about something you know about them, something they are interested in, or something they have a history with.

«This is the first Flame Challenge that asks a question about something that happens inside our brains and our bodies,» said Elizabeth Bass, director of the Alda Center.

Ask questions about something specific related to your practice.

Never be afraid to ask questions about something you're unsure of.

Secondly, being asked a question about something on your resume in an interview and not being sure of what they are referring to is not the way to win a job.

Instead, do some research on the company that you are interviewing with and ask a question about something that you read.

When an interviewer asks you a question about something on your resume that could potentially be viewed as negative, it's important to answer in a very concise manner.

Not exact matches

There's something convenient about being able to ask a question and get the answer out of thin air.

But no matter how long it has been since I was at the helm, if I see something that I don't like, I'm not at all shy about making my thoughts known and asking some very pointed questions.

Two questions are positively worded, meaning they ask the candidate to speak about something he or she did well.

But regardless of your race or that of the person you're speaking with, don't be afraid or too proud to look foolish to ask questions about things you don't know — especially when someone says something that needs further discussion.

I've been asking that question a lot lately, especially as the world shifts from «extremely positive about Facebook» to something that is not quite so positive.

«If the person has given you something in their profile to reference, either that message bait picture, or something interesting written, just ask a question about it,» she said.

«We walk into a store and people know our name, ask us personal questions, and tell us how great we look in a particular pair of shoes...» This got them to consider how we can transfer this experience to the digital landscape, something we know they've been thinking about.

And what I hate is that women are always asked the question about diversity, and if you're one of the few women in the room, you feel obligated to raise it as an issue, when you would rather far often talk about the economics of something.

«If you're not sure about something, ask a good question.»

He agreed, however, that it's an open question: «We are actively asking ourselves about whether or not good governance might mean something different to family firms, and that's the next place we hope to take our research.»

This is something you can actually approach with a system called how to talk to anybody about anything that top interviewers like Barbara Walter use where you can ask someone questions in five different categories:

Leaders may not know everything about how something works, but they know enough about everything to ask questions.

And while there is no legal requirement that underwriters like Mr. Thiel reveal their involvement to the opposing side or the jury, it is considered fair game for lawyers to ask questions about financial backing — something that Gawker Media did on Wednesday in court as part of its efforts to overturn the Hogan judgment.

Writing about some recent sales of Heinz (HNZ) stock by Nelson Peltz of the Trian Companies, Salzman asks the question of whether or not something may be wrong with Heinz.

Because if we really wish to do something about making this place a more respectable spectacle, we would not worry about parsing Mr. Toet, we would wonder why Mr. Toet was up asking this particular question in the first place.

Not all Jews believe this, BTW, but in Judaism I have yet to run across someone who believe that G - d would punish anyone for their «beliefs» and not their «deeds» (take a good look at the Tanach... the contract with the Jews (known as the «teachings of G - d», not «the law») is all about behaviour; and while many Christians have been raised to view «the teachings of G - d» (the law) as something to be «freed» from... one has to ask the simple question..

Scot's response was absolutely fantastic, and something I desperately wish I had encountered five years ago, when I first started asking serious questions about Christianity.

It's the morning after the election and we want to try something new and ask some questions right here in the comments area, because we're interested putting something together about what people think.

which is something EVERYONE should do; research, ask questions, learn about what you believe in.

Whenever he wants to say something challenging or controversial, he does not state it as fact, but asks questions about it.

His presence with us will speak deep within them too and they will know we have something different about us and then may want to ask questions and seek for themselves.

Not only is Fr Tolhurst encouraging the faithful to use the Catechism as a living document, something that is integral to maturation of faith, but he is also attempting to equip us to answer questions about our faith that others may ask of us:

This alone merits attention — as there is much talk about the relative dearth of Catholic authors today — but Trower's life and work offer something more, as they speak to questions that are being asked within the Church today.

Mirosal... you are not doing great with any answers... as a matter of fact you arent answering any questions... you are asking them... and why is it so important to claim that you are atheist... this is false pride... something that is evident in any unatural and foolish human group... its almost as if people hide behind this false pride to make them feel better for things they know in their own heart are foolish... and what need is there for order if there is no GOD... because if no one cared about their soul... then this might become the dog eat dog world that you people are hoping for

I asked you a question about when a scientist should give up looking for any possibility among a near infinity of possibilities left to explore, and state something that isn't scientific or helpful in any way (the «goddidit») reply..

These were when I was: a) A new Christian eager to learn about the bible, when I asked an honest question of a pastor about something I didn't understand.

To say that God is the Lord when Sennacherib is about to enslave you and put out your eyes is to say something of real significance; Similarly today, we have to ask whether technics, happiness, the state, money, or communism (our modern Sennacheribs) must be called the Lord or (there can be no question of an «and») whether Jesus Christ is Lord.

This «True Believer» mindset is, in my opinion, something to consider, observe, and basically ignore during your deconstruction (which is a time of asking questions about what you believe and searching for answers).

It gives us all a chance to explore so many of those key questions about life that we all want to ask, but people tend then to find something much more personal and intimate in the process.

Well kids guess what these is no god, what kind of god would allow this to happen to anyone, if you think there is a loving god you been brainwashed into thinking it smart up its not so bad to believe in reality then you want ask yourself idiotic questions you will just know that some a @ # hole did it and you can do something about it instead of praying

Hmmm... I could have sworn there was something about Christ asking whose image was on the money and telling those who questioned him to render unto Caesar that which was Caesars» and unto God that which was God's for their rewards would be in heaven... then again, maybe I just imagined that part.

If our models are to lead us to ask, and seek answers for, new questions about the world, we must regard them as something more than «logical superfluities», «illicit attempts at explanation», «convenient fictions», or the like.

Questions have been asked about the 29 - year - old's struggles and whether he really fits into this side, and Mourinho made something of an admission about his signing in his press conference on Friday.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Something is seriously wrong here and it is about time someone started asking questions.

When something isn't right it's normal for them to ask questions and complain about things over team radio.

When a follow - up question was asked by Thompson about McElwain's thoughts on how something like that even becomes a story in today's age, McElwain remained firm.